Monday 8 April
19:00 BST
Live on MUTV
19:00 BST
Live on MUTV
With Amass being an unused sub yesterday, hopefully he plays in this game.
How are united doing in the different age groups? I know the u18s are walking the league.
Not too great as the u21s are around midtable. The few games I got to watch(as the u21s games were rarely televised this season) we were a shambles defensively as Tom Myles set up a few goals for the opponents and Huddlestone with his non existent pace was playing CB.How are united doing in the different age groups? I know the u18s are walking the league.
I am not sure that we even have a plan with U21. A lot of players without a future in United are playing, some cause contract expires and we did not want to loan them (Shoretire, Hansen before), some cause loan is not working (Oyedelle, McNeill, Aljofree, Murray), some returning from injury (Ennis), some that are training with the first team (Forson, Kambwalla), kids from U18, some that I am not sure what we want from them like Collyer. So, it is not really a team. Probably it is a season for transition, and next year U18 will move to U21, and U21 clearout will be executed so we can continue to have steady development process.
He’s a defender, better wrap him up in cotton wool. Seriously though I’m interested in seeing how many from that U18s lineup from Saturday will be involved. Should be quite a few.
Yep, I almost dozed off. This is a terrible match. Brighton are not even trying to attack and while we are dominating the ball, we've done feck all with it.This is the most awful football match I have seen in many years......
Half-time summary....
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz - Scrappy owngoal zzzzzzzzz
Playing 3 at the back isn't a system of play but rather a formation. So whether you play 3 at the back or 2 at the back, the system doesn't have to change. Because the system is a set of principles and a formation is something which aids the development of a system of play by having players occupy different zones on the pitch hence a two CB formation could easily be switched to a 3 CB formation for the same purpose.I'm not sure how playing with 3 at the back with wingbacks really helps our players transition into the first team when we dont play that system
Is he that wonder kid, just turned 16?Ibragimov technique is ridiculous. Can just tell he’s going to be some player
Yeah, one of four brothers. Oldest brother is a promising MMA fighter while his younger ones are at United and City’s academy I believe. He’s just turned 16 but his movement, technique and football brain look exceptional for his age! Definitely one to look out for in the next couple of yearsIs he that wonder kid, just turned 16?
He look good?
Playing 3 at the back isn't a system of play but rather a formation. So whether you play 3 at the back or 2 at the back, the system doesn't have to change. Because the system is a set of principles and a formation is something which aids the development of a system of play by having players occupy different zones on the pitch hence a two CB formation could easily be switched to a 3 CB formation for the same purpose.
A formation isn't a system and has never been a system.It is a system. The wingbacks defend higher up the pitch and with a lot less responsibility with the 3 CBs having 90% of the responsibility of looking after wingers on the flanks, not what they will be doing in a back 4 at all. It is the 2 outside CBs who are learning to do fullback jobs.
You talk about a set of beliefs which is a philosophy.A formation isn't a system and has never been a system.
And having fullbacks convert to a wingback role doesn't alter the system but rather changes the role of the individual within that system.
You have no idea what you're talking about and it's hard for you to accept you're wrong.You talk about a set of beliefs which is a philosophy.
You dont know what a system is so I'll tell you. Its what the numbers dont tell you, 4, 2, 5, 2, 1, 3 all of these just represent how many players are in each segment of the pitch. But attached to these are a set of responsibilities that are given based on those numbers and formations. The system is how those numbers work together to succeed. Who has what responsibility to aid each other in each area of the pitch.
When you have 3 at the back the 2 outside CBs immediately confront the wingers. Its their job to take care of that side. Some additional support is expected from wingbacks but mostly for overlaps and additional players arriving in the area - the same thing a winger has with a back 4.
If a winger breaks down the side and gets a cross in to a scorer or scores themselves in a solo goal thats on the CB. Thats why you're playing 3 at the back, so that they can split away and take care of that side. So they cant be losing 1 vs 1. In a 4 defender system thats not the case. That same goal would be on the fullback, he is the man responsible for the winger
Playing wingback for the u21s with a 3 man defence does nothing for helping fullbacks transition to the first team. Not unless we are going to play that system and then it obviously helps a lot. They dont need tactical flexability for formations and systems we dont use. What they need is to gradually be given tougher tasks and more responsibility in their actual positions and roles that we hope they're going to then take up in the first team. It does help them a bit going forward as they're playing in a more adult age group than the 18s and they're playing further forward and are expected to do a bit more with the ball. So it helps that.
Yeah, one of four brothers. Oldest brother is a promising MMA fighter while his younger ones are at United and City’s academy I believe. He’s just turned 16 but his movement, technique and football brain look exceptional for his age! Definitely one to look out for in the next couple of years