Top guy this Gary Neville

jmanu

Guest
Neville shuns testimonial pay-out
By Alan Nixon

Gary Neville has snubbed a £1million pay-out by refusing the offer of a testimonial later this year.
The Manchester United and England right back, currently out injured with a broken bone in his foot, qualifies for the benefit after a decade of service at Old Trafford.

However, Neville has taken a remarkable stance and is sure to earn all-round praise after refusing to follow in the footsteps of his manager Sir Alex Ferguson, as well as team-mates like Ryan Giggs.

The self-confessed United fanatic, who signed a new six-year deal last year, would have been guaranteed a sell-out Old Trafford match - and other money-spinning events - which would have saw the cash roll in.

But Neville - a key figure in the United dressing-room backing the PFA during last season's fight for TV cash - is keen not to cash in on the club's supporters.

Neville, speaking to the Manchester United Magazine, said: 'Even though I know I am eligible, I will not be having one.' The 27-year-old defender's decision comes on the back of Niall Quinn's recent testimonial at Sunderland, where he donated his entire £1m windfall to help build two children's hospitals.

And Leeds' Gary Kelly made a similar gesture, with the £500,000 he made from his benefit match going to cancer charities. Players are often accused of greed by fans who believe that testimonials are an unnecessary extra payday for Premiership stars already earning not-so-small fortunes from their careers.

Neville's decision to go against the trend will also put some of his team-mates under scrutiny, with a host of United stars - including David Beckham and Roy Keane - owed a testimonial during the next 12 months.

Neville says he is optimistic of returning to action before the end of next month
 
Originally posted by jmanu:
<strong>


Neville's decision to go against the trend will also put some of his team-mates under scrutiny, with a host of United stars - including David Beckham and Roy Keane - owed a testimonial during the next 12 months.

</strong><hr></blockquote>

God that is going to create a problem.

Fair play to you Mr Neville.
 
Wouldnt it be better to have the testimonial and give the earnings away to charity than not have it at all ???? Like what Nial Quinn did ??
 
He'll make his Millions from Panto when he retires <img src="graemlins/nervous.gif" border="0" alt="[Nervous]" />
 
Fair play to him, it definatly puts pressure on the rest of the team who have one coming up.
 
I like this trend against testimonials..

He could have one for charity tho, like some of the others mentioned...

Hopefully the days of millionaires making further money for themselves for 10 years service are over
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>

Hopefully the days of millionaires making further money for themselves for 10 years service are over</strong><hr></blockquote>

Thats your socialist thinking coming out again
 
Originally posted by bazalini:
<strong>

Thats your socialist thinking coming out again</strong><hr></blockquote>

Its my ability to recognise that times have changed since the years where testimonials were more deserving...

cnut

;)
 
Surely the whole point of a testimonial should be to thank players for their years of service....at the end of their career. With that in mind I hope Gaz has one at OT before he finishes playing. Not when he's 27.
 
Fair play to Gary. I object to testimonials on a number of counts, such as they don't need them, why should the club use the fans to help subsidise their contracts (again),and finally if they do have them why not charge reduced rates and enable local kids to get in and watch their heroes (Ryan Giggs). The only ones who deserve them are the likes of Billy Garton (who wasn't given use of OT for his) whose careers are ended early due to injury/illness.
:p
 
I don't get it. Having a testimonial is not ripping off fans, they choose to go, don't they?

It sounds to me like he is trying to make a point about not being greedy but I would much rather see him having that testimonial, the fans going to thank him for 10 years of service if they want to (which they probably would) and the money going to charity, where it is most welcome.

I don't get it. <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
 
When testimonials began players did not make the money they now do. So it was one game to help them and their families.

Now players have a testimonial year -- full of high paying activities.

IMO the Nevilles, Beckhams of this world don't need the money. And if they want to donate to charity -- they can organise other events.

So fair play to Gary Neville.
 
Originally posted by United78:
<strong>When testimonials began players did not make the money they now do. So it was one game to help them and their families.

Now players have a testimonial year -- full of high paying activities.

IMO the Nevilles, Beckhams of this world don't need the money. And if they want to donate to charity -- they can organise other events.

So fair play to Gary Neville.</strong><hr></blockquote>


Any one think Gary Neville should play it and give it to charity???
 
Actually it is a bloody lifesaver that Gary has done this. It may have escaped peoples attention but Nicky Butt and David Beckham are both due testimonials this season too. All three made their debuts in 92/3 with a single sub appearance. With Keano due next season we'd have testimonial fixture congestion :)

What I'd like to see is a single testimonial for charity for the entire famous five at once. Best solution all round.
 
Originally posted by bazalini:
Any one think Gary Neville should play it and give it to charity???
<hr></blockquote>

Its a fair point -- my only hesitation is that as Forza Viola pointed out we have a number of possible testimonials coming up -- United are alredy heavily involved in charity work and very soon people will stop going.

Even (Saint) Niall Quinn was worried about ticket sales. And remember Tony Adams' failure a number of years ago?

Maybe one game a year with money divided up for various causes chosen by those who are entitled to a testimonial?
 
I think its a good call by Gaz. If he, Beckham, Scholes, Butt and Keane, who are all due testamonials, played then this season then it would be ridiculous. I agree that United should arrange one game for all of them, with their agreements, give the proceeds to charity.

I've had some great times watching testamonials down the years, most recently the Gaffer and Giggs', but the times of top players needing the financial reward is past.
 
I was just wondering. Maybe his point is going against the "cult of personality" that goes with testimonials? Maybe he thinks that is the least they need now? Maybe he doesn't feel good about seeing half the squad get a testimonial immediately after a trophyless season?

If that's what he's thinking, RESPECT.
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>Hang on

Didn't he actually say that he's postponing it till the end of his career?</strong><hr></blockquote>

I read that he was thinking about having a testimonal at the end of his career and that he'd use the proceeds to build a facility for the fans at OT as a thank you...
 
Originally posted by Red15:
<strong>

I read that he was thinking about having a testimonal at the end of his career and that he'd use the proceeds to build a facility for the fans at OT as a thank you...</strong><hr></blockquote>

If this runs true, Gary is a true red

:)
 
Originally posted by yaps:
<strong>

If this runs true, Gary is a true red

:) </strong><hr></blockquote>
Was there ever doubt? He hates scousers. <img src="graemlins/devil.gif" border="0" alt="[Devil]" /> <img src="graemlins/keano.gif" border="0" alt="[Keano]" /> <img src="graemlins/devil.gif" border="0" alt="[Devil]" />
 
Originally posted by bazalini:
<strong>He'll make his Millions from Panto when he retires <img src="graemlins/nervous.gif" border="0" alt="[Nervous]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

is that a refercence to Widow Twanky. I always thought with a bit of eye liner he'd be perfect. or dot cotton.
 
Respect.

Nice to see some headlinesabout money, for the *right* reasons...
 
Gary Neville is a Red - and a top bloke too. I don`t think he was implying any criticism of other Reds who have had or want testimonials but it is clear Gary understands he is privileged to earn more money in one week than many earn in a year.

It was interesting to read others`opinions on testimonials but I maintain their original purpose has been lost. Some time ago footballers did not earn a great deal of money and given that a footballer`s career can be uncertain and or end suddenly, testimonials were once a way of ensuring the footballer concerned obtained some financial benefits.

However, these days footballers such as Giggsy and managers such as Sir Alex do not need testimonials. It was their right to have one if they wanted, but of course two such independently wealthy men as these did not need the fans to dig into their pockets for them.

The original purpose of testimonials went out the window some time ago and to hear Gary Neville take such a stand shows just how honourable this man is.

<img src="graemlins/angel.gif" border="0" alt="[Angel]" /> <img src="graemlins/angel.gif" border="0" alt="[Angel]" /> <img src="graemlins/angel.gif" border="0" alt="[Angel]" /> <img src="graemlins/angel.gif" border="0" alt="[Angel]" />