thierry or patrick?

emilehenry

Guest
who'd you rather have? henry or viera? if it came down to it...i know it's not realistic as arsenal are one of the biggest clubs in europe and all, but just suppose we put an offer on the table that they couldn't refuse, who would you take?
 
Henry.

Both to enhance us and deplete them.

Saying that, Wenger would probably dig up Henry II for about 5 million of the £30 odd million we'd paid for Henry the first!!

;)
 
Henry....because we still have Keane to operate in midfield, we don't really need Vieria. Anyway, don't think it's possible to sign both of them, as they're fully committed to Arsenal.
 
Henry, no question. And we probably could have had him as well. :(
 
Henry, he'd be just the pace man we'd need and he'd suit our style of play. If Keano would move to the back then I'd be happy to have Viera sitting in front of him which would make us much more solid. Aren't they both out of contract at the end of next season and if they dont sign wont Arsenal have to sell them??
 
No use crying over spilled milk. We could also have had Vieira, Zidane, Figo, Cantona...

Oh, we had the last one. So maybe someone else should be crying over their milk! :D
 
Viera, while Henry sets the EPL alight every week he has yet to prove himself to me at the top level, for France or in the CL for arsenal.
 
Viera - to eventually take over from Keane

Utd always break the british transfer record to sign a player for the central midfield position.

Utd will make the gooners an offer they cannot refuse, money is needed for their new stadium.

Henry would be nice too, but central midfield is priority.

all out of my arse, of course :D
 
vieira - the leader to eventually succeed from King Royston.
a true world class talent who dont go missing like henry.
:cool:
 
The only chance we have to get them is if wanker quits Arsenal.
 
henry all the way
vieria is shit and a poo player is nothing special and overrated.
keano is the only one with butt being valueable back-up