The White Pele
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2006
- Messages
- 5,032
Introduction to the Par PL table
Some of the older posters among us will remember the "Storey table" introduced by former Arsenal-supporting poster PeterStorey and this is essentially the same. In essence this view of the table seeks to give a fairer reflection on the title race, taking into account the relative difficulty of the fixtures. For example, if your team is 2 points off the top of the league after 10 games but you have played a handful of the top teams away from home already, then logic dictates that you may actually be in a better position than the league leaders. This scoring system attempts to quantify that.
I will strive to update this thread each week with the latest scores and table.
Scoring
The scoring is simple. Each fixture is assigned a "par" value or expected outcome based on the perceived level of the opponent. The actual points achieved is then compared to the par score and your score vs par is accumulated, as it is in golf.
So here's the formula to win the league:
Win all home games against the bottom 12 sides (12 x par 3) = 36 points
Win all away games against the bottom 12 sides (12 x par 3) = 36 points
Average 2 points per game at home against the top 8 sides (7 x par 2) = 14 points
Average 1 point per game away against the top 8 sides (7 x par 2) = 7 points
TOTAL 93 points
So a score of -3 or better probably wins the league and a score of -23 or better is probably required to finish in the top 4. Below shows the point distribution in the league for the last 3 seasons:
*23/34 shows underlying points totals excluding points deductions
The "Top 8" sides are as per last season's final league positions: City, Arsenal, Liverpool, Aston Villa, Tottenham, Chelsea, Newcastle, United
Why a top 8?
Are the "par" scores reflective of the points achieved by the Champions in recent season?
Some of the older posters among us will remember the "Storey table" introduced by former Arsenal-supporting poster PeterStorey and this is essentially the same. In essence this view of the table seeks to give a fairer reflection on the title race, taking into account the relative difficulty of the fixtures. For example, if your team is 2 points off the top of the league after 10 games but you have played a handful of the top teams away from home already, then logic dictates that you may actually be in a better position than the league leaders. This scoring system attempts to quantify that.
I will strive to update this thread each week with the latest scores and table.
Scoring
The scoring is simple. Each fixture is assigned a "par" value or expected outcome based on the perceived level of the opponent. The actual points achieved is then compared to the par score and your score vs par is accumulated, as it is in golf.
So here's the formula to win the league:
Win all home games against the bottom 12 sides (12 x par 3) = 36 points
Win all away games against the bottom 12 sides (12 x par 3) = 36 points
Average 2 points per game at home against the top 8 sides (7 x par 2) = 14 points
Average 1 point per game away against the top 8 sides (7 x par 2) = 7 points
TOTAL 93 points
So a score of -3 or better probably wins the league and a score of -23 or better is probably required to finish in the top 4. Below shows the point distribution in the league for the last 3 seasons:
Position | 21/22 | 22/23 | 23/24* | 3 yr average |
1 | 93 | 89 | 91 | 91 |
2 | 92 | 84 | 89 | 88 |
3 | 74 | 75 | 82 | 77 |
4 | 71 | 71 | 68 | 70 |
5 | 69 | 67 | 66 | 67 |
6 | 58 | 62 | 63 | 61 |
7 | 56 | 61 | 60 | 59 |
8 | 52 | 60 | 60 | 57 |
9 | 51 | 59 | 52 | 54 |
10 | 51 | 52 | 49 | 51 |
11 | 49 | 45 | 48 | 47 |
12 | 48 | 44 | 48 | 47 |
13 | 46 | 41 | 48 | 45 |
14 | 45 | 40 | 47 | 44 |
15 | 40 | 39 | 46 | 42 |
16 | 39 | 38 | 39 | 39 |
17 | 38 | 36 | 36 | 37 |
18 | 35 | 34 | 26 | 32 |
19 | 23 | 31 | 24 | 26 |
20 | 22 | 25 | 16 | 21 |
*23/34 shows underlying points totals excluding points deductions
The "Top 8" sides are as per last season's final league positions: City, Arsenal, Liverpool, Aston Villa, Tottenham, Chelsea, Newcastle, United
Why a top 8?
If we're looking at the title race, in reality I think most objective pundits would be expecting Arsenal and City to fight for the trophy again but beyond those two it's difficult to draw a clear divide between those sides that could qualify for the Champions League and those that can't.
The "big six" is still a thing. In the last 10 seasons each of the "big six" teams have finished in the top six at least 8 times. Outside of the "big six" only Leicester have finished in the top six more than once in the last 10 seasons. However, Newcastle and Villa have both qualified for the Champions League in the last couple of years and are well placed to compete for those places again this season so they have been included.
Outside of these 8 teams, perhaps West Ham could challenge the European places this season given the ambition they have showed in the summer but it remains to be seen. Palace also have some momentum and Brighton have finished up there recently so ones to watch out for.
The "big six" is still a thing. In the last 10 seasons each of the "big six" teams have finished in the top six at least 8 times. Outside of the "big six" only Leicester have finished in the top six more than once in the last 10 seasons. However, Newcastle and Villa have both qualified for the Champions League in the last couple of years and are well placed to compete for those places again this season so they have been included.
Outside of these 8 teams, perhaps West Ham could challenge the European places this season given the ambition they have showed in the summer but it remains to be seen. Palace also have some momentum and Brighton have finished up there recently so ones to watch out for.
Are the "par" scores reflective of the points achieved by the Champions in recent season?
Broadly, yes.
If you look at the points per game (PPG) of City over the last 3 seasons and round to the nearest whole number, then the Par scores for each fixture ring true. In reality, although the champions rack up the vast majority of their points in the games home/away to the bottom 12 it is obviously unlikely to have a perfect record across these 24 games and therefore 3 points per game is unrealistic. Nevertheless, over the last 3 seasons City have averaged 2.7 points per game across these fixtures and any draw or defeat against these teams would definitely be viewed as "points dropped" and so 3 is a reasonable par.
To offset those points dropped against the bottom 12, City have scored more than 1 PPG away to the top 8 and more than 2 PPG at home to the top 8 in order to reach the 90 point benchmark
How can you have a Par of 2 for home games against the top sides when you can't actually achieve 2 points?
It's a fair challenge and as a result of this scoring you will always have a + or - from these games.
However that feels right in my opinion. Beating a rival at home never just feels like a par result it feels like a small gain. And expecting to win all 7 of those games feels unrealistic. Similarly, drawing at home to a rival may not feel like a terrible result but definitely feels like a small loss and drawing all 7 of those games would not be title form.
If you look at the points per game (PPG) of City over the last 3 seasons and round to the nearest whole number, then the Par scores for each fixture ring true. In reality, although the champions rack up the vast majority of their points in the games home/away to the bottom 12 it is obviously unlikely to have a perfect record across these 24 games and therefore 3 points per game is unrealistic. Nevertheless, over the last 3 seasons City have averaged 2.7 points per game across these fixtures and any draw or defeat against these teams would definitely be viewed as "points dropped" and so 3 is a reasonable par.
To offset those points dropped against the bottom 12, City have scored more than 1 PPG away to the top 8 and more than 2 PPG at home to the top 8 in order to reach the 90 point benchmark
Avg pts | Avg PPG | |
Top 8 home | 16.7 | 2.38 |
Top 8 away | 10.3 | 1.48 |
Bottom 12 home | 32.0 | 2.67 |
Bottom 12 away | 32.0 | 2.67 |
Total | 91.0 | 2.39 |
How can you have a Par of 2 for home games against the top sides when you can't actually achieve 2 points?
It's a fair challenge and as a result of this scoring you will always have a + or - from these games.
However that feels right in my opinion. Beating a rival at home never just feels like a par result it feels like a small gain. And expecting to win all 7 of those games feels unrealistic. Similarly, drawing at home to a rival may not feel like a terrible result but definitely feels like a small loss and drawing all 7 of those games would not be title form.