Test draft Match 6 - Boycott vs Raees

Who will win the test series?


  • Total voters
    15
  • Poll closed .

Varun

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
46,831
Location
Mumbai
Welcome to the sixth match of the test draft!

  • Judge the players on their peaks excluding any 6-12 month purple patch.
  • Vote for the team you think will win a 3 match test series between these 2 sides based on the given nature of pitches.
  1. 1st test: Good batting pitch.
  2. 2nd test: Slow wicket which gets worse as the game goes on and will assist spinners heavily.
  3. 3rd test: Green top. Assists pace, seam and swing bowling.
Team Raees:

Navjot Sidhu
Arivinda De Silva
Brian Lara
Inzamam Ul-Haq
Steve Waugh
Alan Knott
Kapil Dev
Abdul Qadir
Saeed Ajmal/Amaranth plays the 3rd test
Bob Willis
Garth McKenzie

Team Boycott:

Lawry
Fleming
Dravid
Pieterson
Azharuddin
Brian Macmillan
Haddin
Broad/David Allen(2nd test only)
Marshall
Colin Croft
Macgill
 
Last edited:
Write up Team Boycott:

Team Boycott


EN9B2ZD.png


FQ5YuXE.png


*David Allen will take Stuart Broad's place for the second test (Slow wicket which gets worse as the game goes on and will assist spinners heavily.)
Bill Lawry placed great value on his wicket but he was by no means limited in his repertoire of shots. One of the finest players of fast bowling of his era, he actually begun his career as a bit of a dasher. Young Lawry had the courage and technical execution to take on bowlers with fierce hooks, pulls and drives, which even led to a comparison to the great Donald Bradman. It was in his maiden test series where Lawry learnt the importance of applying steady and secure foundations in conditions which suited swing and seam. He put in a series of patient and crucial innings to cement his spot as the opener, displacing captain Bob Simpson in the process and finishing as leading run scorer with 420 at 52.50. This was just the start of what was to be a successful decade as the fulcrum of the Australian batting line up.

Stephen Fleming with his elegant stroke-play provides good foil at the top of the innings. While his conversion rate isn't great, he makes good contributions, important contributions to build a solid foundation. He has three double centuries to his name and having mainly being a part of a comparatively weak test side talent wise his success as batsman and captain is very impressive. An excellent slip catcher and leader to add.

Rahul Dravid will be the anchor as he always has been. The Wall needs no introduction. Technically proficient, mentally strong, leads by example, digs in and scores big. All qualities which makes him one of the most prolific run scorers of all time. Another excellent slip catcher as well.

Kevin Pietersen polarizes public opinion with his brash personality but no one can discount his special talent. He has not only scored runs all over the world, he has dismantled attacks in the process. Three innings immediately come to mind. 158 at the Oval in the final test of the 2005 Ashes where he toyed with the Aussies and announced himself as an innovative, belting force. 149 against the South Africans at a difficult time for England in 2012, famously taking apart Dale Steyn at one point in what was the series to decide whose number one. And also the 186 in Mumbai later that year which levelled the series and gave England the momentum to go on to win it. His 360 array of shots leave bowlers praying at his imperious best. But he can also dig deep as shown in his 151 in Sri Lanka which was a test of concentration in extremely humid and trying conditions. He has the lot.

Mohammad Azhuruddin exited the game with his name tattered but his talent and performances stand tall. Fluent footwork, timing and strong wrists saw him assert himself without breaking sweat. You dare not bowl a tad off line as the ball will be whipped away to the onside. Anything slightly wide of off will be caressed through the covers. And with this grace, the carefree perception from the outside, his productivity shows there was inner steel to get the job done. And more often than not he did.

Brian McMillan was a favorite of 90s cricket fans. Capable of bowling medium-fast he did his job well as an additional bowler, keeping things tight with consistent line and length while the front-liners got a rest. His accuracy was vital as well in attritional conditions to bowl long spells for not many as his economy rate shows. As a batsman he had a solid technique and excellent temperament which allowed him to contribute in the lower order with tail enders at the other end, which at times saw him miss out on converting 50s into 100s. In my team he has higher quality around him to be able to bat to his full potential.

Brad Haddin is a fighting cricketer. He waited a long time to get his break and lasted longer than many expected. His test career coincided with a change of guard in Australian cricket which meant he was not able to be in a settled line-up until near the end when the Aussies climbed back to the top. At 7 where has spent the bulk of his batting he averages 38. Impressive in two ways: he can bat with the tail-enders for one but also he can bat when the pressure is on and he's in earlier than expected (see 13/14 Ashes).
 
Stuart Broad has developed into one of the leading bowlers of world cricket today. Tall with fast bounce he has ironed out his accuracy to reap full rewards. A rhythmic bowling action for a bowler truly capable of devastating spells. He has control over seam movements to nag at batsman with pitched up deliveries, producing the edge time and time again. In seaming conditions he is the real deal.

Malcolm Marshall goes down in history as arguably the greatest fast bowler ever. A relatively short man he was fearsome. It wasn't just raw pace. He was incredibly skilled. Intelligent. Bouncers, inswingers, outswingers, yorkers, cutters. The complete fast bowler who not only scared batsman, but toyed with them. He succeeded everywhere he played. Words won't do him justice.



Colin Croft had his test career curtailed by joining the rebel tour but in his limited time he made his mark as a blistering fast bowler. He bowled with aggression and did fantastic in Pakistan, his only venture into batting friendly conditions, so one wonders how successful he'd have done had he played a full career. His stats are brilliant as it is and just watch the video underneath to realise the force he had. Interestingly his 37 batting innings brought 22 not outs and having been used as nightwatchman before it suggests he can hold a bat so to speak.



Stuart MacGill can be happy with what he achieved but he knows there would have been a hell of a lot more had he not been in the era of Warne. MacGill himself could spin the team to victory and for a time displace Warne from the team under Steve Waugh's captaincy. A great spinner who perhaps in another era would be classed as one of the best.




David Allen combined wily skill and concentration to bowl long spells, keep the opposition dry of runs and lull them into mistakes. He was primarily a right arm off break bowler and with subtle variations of pace he made it difficult for batsman to judge the flight and turn. An economy of 2.01 is outstanding. In the second test he'll provide foil for MacGill and with Marshall and Croft this attack will be extremely miserly. Handy with the bat too.
 
Write up Team Raees:

TEST 1 - BAT FRIENDLY PITCH (i.e. Sri Lankan/Indian pitch)


Lineup:


Navjot Sidhu (ave: 71 v Sri Lanka/ 53 in India)

Arivinda De Silva (ave: 53 at home)

Brian Lara (ave: 55 in SL, 49 in India)

Inzamam Ul-Haq (ave: 58 in SL, 54 in India)

Steve Waugh (Ave: 47 in India)

Alan Knott (ave: 29 India)

Kapil Dev (ave: 37 with bat @ home, 26 with ball @ home)

Abdul Qadir (ave: 34 in SL with ball, struggled in India @69 with ball but got Gavaskar out twice on flat pitches)

Saeed Ajmal (ave: 32 in SL, ave: 26 in UAE, ave: 25 in Bang)

Bob Willis (ave: 22 in India - got Gavaskar out three times on flat pitches, ave: 26 in Pak)

Garth McKenzie (ave 19 in India, ave 16 in Pak)


Why i could lose this game:


Abdul Qadir is a weak link for me because his record on flat pitches is not great but I would still rather risk an extra bowler who does have it in him to get a GOAT batsmen out on a flat pitch than risk Amaranth who was not a great batsmen on flat surfaces against weak bowling attacks.


Marshall is arguably the best fast bowler who ever lived and dominated on any surface, so he will remain a threat even on a flat pitch. McMillan is a quality all rounder who can keep it tight on any pitch. Now Croft is unproven on Indian and Sri Lankan pitches, but he is still a quality line and length bowler who shouldn’t be a donkey by any means on a flat pitch.



Batsmen wise, Kevin Pietersen and Azhar are both stroke makers of the highest order so on a flat pitch you would assume they can do damage, Azhar particularly has a great record on Indian pitches.


Why I could win this game:


My batsmen including Kapil Dev are outstanding on Indian/Sri Lankan pitches, and I have a number of flamboyant stroke players who have history of producing big scores (Sidhu-Waugh = 201*, 267, 400*, 329, 200 - Dev himself has a 163* to his name). I think my batting attack if it sees off the threat of Marshall can pummel the remainder of his bowling attack and I would be looking to post 500+ with that batting lineup if all are at their peak.



My bowlers apart from Qadir, are absolutely lethal on flat surfaces especially Mckenzie who many claim to be the best flat track fast bowler of his generation and possibly all time. Willis was terrific on subcontinental surfaces an Ajmal has great figures and has taken 38 wickets in Sri Lanka alone. If Qadir can chip in with 1-2 wickets per innings, I am very confident the other three can take the other 8.. McKenzie has got guys out like Sobers, Boycott, Barrington (6 times each) and he prefers the flat pitches so he will be right in his element.



McKenzie was particularly noted for his muscular physique (hence his nickname) and ability to take wickets on good batting tracks

1964 saw McKenzie’s made his second Ashes tour of England. He led the attack as Australia retained the Ashes. His 29 wickets in five Tests equalled the highest obtained for Australia in England by Clarrie Grimmett in 1930. He took 21 wickets when Australia visited India and Pakistan on the return journey to Australia. Another seven wickets in a one off Test against Pakistan in Melbourne in December established a new record for the number of Test wickets in the space of one year; from 11 December 1963 to 8 December 1964 he took 73 wickets in fifteen Tests. This surpassed Maurice Tate's 65 wickets in 1924–25. In this period, he became the youngest bowler to reach 100 wickets, at the age of 23 and 162 days, 139 days younger than A.L. Valentine. He was named as one of the Wisden Cricketers of the Year in 1965, the first Western Australian born recipient


TEST 2 - TURNING PITCH (i.e. Sub-continental (indo/Pak/SL), (Adelaide/MCG/SCG),


Navjot Sidhu (probably the best opener v spin in the draft, ave 71 v SL, ave 53 in India, destroyed Murali & Warne)

Arivinda De Silva (ave 52 @ home, 40+ against Pak/Aus/India ((Kumble ave 58, Mushtaq ave 55, M. Ahmed ave 95)

Brian Lara (GOAT against spin - averages 124 v Murali, 74 v Warne , 110 v Macgill)

Inzamam Ul-Haq(Ave 54/58/53 in SL/India/Pak.. impressive on subcontinental surfaces)

Steve Waugh (Ave 87 v SL, never got out to Mursli, ave 40+ in Pak/India - scored a legendary 157 v Saqlain/Mushy)

Alan Knott (him and Underwood were deadly, great WK to spin bowlers, ave 62 v Pak and 30 v India)

Kapil Dev (ave: 37 with bat @ home, 26 with ball @ home)

Abdul Qadir (Border, Gavaskar and Richards as victims 3*+, a master in Pak conditions, great at MCG/Oval)

Saeed Ajmal (Destroyed Pietersen - dismissed him 5 times/Kallis/Jayawardene, thrives in any conditions)

Bob Willis ((ave: 22 in India - got Gavaskar out three times on flat pitches, ave: 26 in Pak)

Garth McKenzie (ave 19 in India, ave 16 in Pak)


Why I could lose this game:



As per above, Marshall can still destroy batsmen on any pitch and McMillan will still prove a handful. If David Allen plays, he was renowned as a big spinner and has claimed some notable scalps like Sobers and Graeme Pollock, so whilst not a household name, he has some solid test credentials. MacGill on a turning pitch could be a serious handful.



Fleming, excellent in Sri Lanka and solid in India, Dravid, Pietersen and Azhar.. that is more than enough strength there to handle a turning pitch. All have excellent footwork and composure, with ability to take on the best spinners.



Why I will win this game:



I am fairly confident that I have the perfect team for a turning pitch. Battingwise, Sidhu is the perfect opener (He cracked eight sixes in 124 against Sri Lanka - Muralitharan and all - in 1993-94, and hammered four fifties in five innings against the Australians in 1997-98, singling out Shane Warne for a personalised spanking), De Silva is reknowned for his ability to make runs against spinners (ESPN: For the next couple of years, de Silva added more match-turning knocks to a chest already full of cracking innings. In particular, he took a liking to Anil Kumble's bowling and as a result, India suffered. In 1997, over a period of five innings, he compiled four centuries against India), Lara is rated the best batsmen against spin of all time () and there is an example why, amazing footwork, (221 v Sri Lanka) able to hit it late or move forward to drive it for 6. Warne, Murali were his bunnies but he has a proven track record of smashing the living daylights out of MacGill. The rest of my lower order are accomplished players of spin.



Bowling wise, Qadir is rated as the best spinner to come from Pakistan. England were his favourite victims through his career, responsible for his international breakthrough in 1977-78 as well as his finest hours, at the Oval in 1987 and the home series later that year (he took 30 wickets in three Tests, including the best bowling in an innings by a Pakistani, 9 for 56 in Lahore). Imran was to be a key influence on his career, one of the few capable of getting the best out of Qadir the man and bowler. Pakistan were able to compete with the era's most frighteningly dominant team the West Indies without losing a series to them in the mid-80s was largely down to Qadir's successes against them (he got 42 wickets @30 ave. taking out V Richards 3 times). It is impossible to believe that wrist-spin has ever been bowled better than Qadir did in his home city of Lahore in 1987-88, when he took 9 for 56 against England. Graham Gooch, who faced him that day, said Qadir was even finer than Shane Warne, to whom he passed on the candle.



And his ruthlessness against spinners was legion. He cracked eight sixes in 124 against Sri Lanka - Muralitharan and all - in 1993-94, and hammered four fifties in five innings against the Australians in 1997-98, singling out Shane Warne for a personalised spanking. For the next couple of years, de Silva added more match-turning knocks to a chest already full of cracking innings. In particular, he took a liking to Anil Kumble's bowling and as a result, India suffered. In 1997, over a period of five innings, he compiled four centuries against India.
 
TEST 3 - SEAMERS PITCH (West Indies, England, Australia, South Africa, Pak/NZ)


Navjot Sidhu (scored 201, 116 and 107 against Ambrose, Walsh (Bishop and Marshall), known for his dour defence v pace.

Arivinda De Silva (ave 45 v WI, 47 v Aus, 39 v Eng, 36 v SA, famous for his pull shots and wrist cuts v pace)

Mohinder Amaranth (rated as one of the best ever v fast bowling, scored 101, 58,117, 91, 80, 54, 116 against Marshall & co)

Brian Lara (who can forget his 153* v Australia v McGrath at his peak, ave 51 v Aus, 49 v SA, 62 v Eng, 53 v Pak)

Inzamam Ul-Haq (Imran khan called him best pak v pace, Vaas @70, Walsh @55, McGrath @41… inconsistent but brilliant)

Steve Waugh (Master in hostile conditions, Ave 115 v Donald, 85 v Younis, ave 58 v Eng, 50 v SA, 35 v Pak - Dominant)

Alan Knott (ave 42 v Pak whilst Khan/Nawaz at their peak, scored 116 v peak Roberts/Holding, ave 46 in the 1976 series)

Kapil Dev (ave: 41 v Eng, 31 v WI, 27 v Aus, 40 v SA (Scored 3 centuries against WI v Marshall, Holding & co) Bowling wise.. Gooch, Gower, Richards, Greening - all of them 6-11 times he got them out. Aus = 79W @24, in West Indies 89W @ 25.

Abdul Qadir (Great spinner in English/Aus/West Indian conditions.. 45W v Aus @35, 82W v Eng @25, 53W v WI @30)

Bob Willis (325 W @ 25, Greg C (out 9 times), Gavaskar (5 times), Crowe (4 times, bowled him twice), Viv (3 times))

Garth McKenzie (Ave 25, 42, 24, 26, 17 v Eng in seaming conditions with the ball - 53W) Dangerous in english conditions.


Why I could lose…


Marshall and Croft in seaming conditions are an absolute menace and 2 of the original fab 4 of West Indian bowlers. Broad in english conditions is dangerous and can definitely have it in him to take a big scalp or two if he is pumped up. Lawry is a wiley old opener, Dravid ‘the wall’ is perfect for a match like this which will be super competitive and can anchor the innings against my bowlers who I wouldn’t put in the all time great category of bowlers (tier 2 bowlers) and Pietersen is proven in english conditions and any fast conditions in all honesty. Azhar has a decent record in England but a poor one in SA/Aus, so is potentially a threat. With his three pronged pace attack in addition to McMillan, he can bowl any side out in favourable conditions. His batting can handle my bowling attack on this pitch, that is not an inconceivable notion.



Why I could win…


I think at the worst, I should be able to get a draw because of the strength of my batting line up, even Qadir is proven against the west Indies when it comes to my batting. Sidhu is capable of anchoring innings in hostile conditions, De Silva can fight fire with fire against the best fast bowlers in the nineties, Amaranth (I will write more about him in detail is a legend against hostile bowling), Lara has been called the best by McGrath, Donald, Akram to name but a few. Inzamam is renowned by Pakistani’s as the best batsmen v pace, one anecdote even suggests that Shoaib Akhtar would refuse to bowl to Inzi during net sessions because he would fear getting thrashed around pre match and Waugh is infamous for his ability to take on the likes of Ambrose and Allan Donald during their most aggressive periods of bowling.



In terms of bowling, A trio of Dev, Willis and McKenzie is more than capable of getting 20 wickets in seaming conditions, if needed Waugh can also chip in and Amaranth both of whom have taken wickets of players such as Richards, Miandad, Gooch and Dravid to name but a few. Dev is a master at swinging the ball, moving it off the seam and getting all time great batsmen out with ease.. and Willis is an absolute speed merchant, arguably the fastest bowler England have produced and this is despite him playing injured for most of his career and Garth McKenzie was at his peak, Australia’s fastest and nastiest bowler during the 60’s and very successful in England.
 
Sorry guys for not formatting my post slightly better. Am going out now to play a real game of cricket but will be back in evening, best of luck @Boycott
 
First of all best of luck @Raees. You've got a good side which was one of my favorites from all the teams.

My strategy and how I believe I will win this match-up is as follows (three posts incoming)

Pitch One: On a good batting track I believe in my batsmen to cash in. There will be some help early in the innings for both our attacks but in Lawry and Fleming I have two batsman who can navigate this. Lawry averages 43 in India and is technically correct to bat long and big. Fleming is more free-flowing and can get the score ticking over to build a strong foundation for when my middle order get in the game who will lick their lips on these conditions. I believe we will get a big score to give our bowlers freedom to attack. Marshall has 36 wickets in 9 matches in India at 24.61 and 35 in 10 matches in Pakistan at 21.46 . He'll be our main man in all tests and in particular this one as his mean pace and array of deliveries will get something even out of a lifeless pitch. He has dismissed Kapil Dev nine times in total. Colin Croft only played one series in Asia (Pakistan) where he took 17 wickets at 17.76. Stuart Broad found it difficult admittingly in Sri Lanka and India but on the flip side has 20 wickets in 6 games in the UAE at 22.85. That part of the world is the flattest conditions currently, in an era of batting friendly pitches. Brian McMillan in 3 tests in India had 6 wickets at 33. Small sample but he is not expected to take wickets. As states he bowls long spells for very little which will be crucial. MacGill has 15 wickets in 3 matches in Pakistan, not so good in two games in Sri Lanka and brilliant in two games in Bangladesh but discount that record for the lack of quality Bangladesh had if you want.

Generally speaking I don't see how I will lose the first test. Bowling wise my attack is very capable of getting wickets in these conditions. My batsmen have a good balance of grit and flair and I bat deep. We'll see how the voters feel.
 
Solid teams, with some absolute top class players.

I think Raees is favoured on the slow wicket, with the Qadir-Ajmal partnership. I like MacGill, but I don't think David Allen is at the same level. Kapil Dev is also well accustomed to bowling in these conditions.

However, I think Boycott has a better chance in the other two matches and thus to win the series overall. I'm not convinced Dev-Willis is a good enough opening seamer duo, and don't see the other three bowlers providing enough support to take 20 wickets. Marshall-Croft-Broad is superior here I think.

On the batting side, Aravinda has played only one Test as an opener and is basically a free wicket for Marshall as I see it. With Raees also having a long tail, Lara, Inzamam and Waugh are the main wickets. Take those and there isn't a whole lot left. Of course that's a very strong middle order, but it will be exposed to the pace of Marshall and Croft early. Boycott also has a strong top five himself.

Initial verdict is Boycott 2-1. Will revisit as the discussion develops.
 
Pitch Two: On a spinning track the three of Dravid, Azhuruddin and Pietersen will be my key batsmen to win this match. Three dominant players of spin in different ways. Dravid smothers with sharp footwork and timing, and patiently anchors the innings. Pietersen takes the charge and lowers the confidence and puts doubts into the bowlers mind. And Azharuddin finds the gaps toying with the bowler. Three excellent players of spin bowling who can lay on the runs. Lets not forget the openers too who can dig deep. The opposition has a fine spinner in Qadir. Ajmal I'm a little dubious about for obvious reasons but we can gloss over that for the purpose of the draft. Those three batsmen have enjoyed success against Warne and Murali. Ditto Stephen Fleming. I'm confident we'll negate trouble and put on a high score.

My opponent has classy batsmen of spin too. I agree that Lara is the best at playing spin. I remember Aravinda as a punisher of spin and so was Inzamam. This is where my bowling strategy comes into play:

  • MacGill could bamboozle the best batsman. He had an unorthodox bowling action which allowed for the art of unpredictability to be a part of his repertoire. He could extract a lot of turn, bounce, skilled at flighting the ball and a decent arm ball. This armoury means batsmen will find it difficult to settle at first. Of course if they do get in there is the opportunity to cash in until days 4/5 when spin dominates. I don't plan to allow this to happen. David Allen's economy of 2.01 is outstanding. He could generate turn and had a wily brain to keep the batsmen under control with nagging accuracy. Bowling spells in tandem, batsmen will be restricted in runs. Remember I have excellent fielders so we have the ability to conjure up wickets with great skill and/or force errors.
  • It doesn't get easier when Marshall and Croft take the ball. Marshall as mentioned has excellent records everywhere and Croft was successful in his one tour to a spin friendly country in Pakistan. Combined with their skills they have too excellent economies, quite obvious as they bowled bloody fast! This accuracy will be crucial and my bowlers will be miserly.
 
Solid teams, with some absolute top class players.

I think Raees is favoured on the slow wicket, with the Qadir-Ajmal partnership. I like MacGill, but I don't think David Allen is at the same level. Kapil Dev is also well accustomed to bowling in these conditions.

However, I think Boycott has a better chance in the other two matches and thus to win the series overall. I'm not convinced Dev-Willis is a good enough opening seamer duo, and don't see the other three bowlers providing enough support to take 20 wickets. Marshall-Croft-Broad is superior here I think.

On the batting side, Aravinda has played only one Test as an opener and is basically a free wicket for Marshall as I see it. With Raees also having a long tail, Lara, Inzamam and Waugh are the main wickets. Take those and there isn't a whole lot left. Of course that's a very strong middle order, but it will be exposed to the pace of Marshall and Croft early. Boycott also has a strong top five himself.


Initial verdict is Boycott 2-1. Will revisit as the discussion develops.

This is how I feel about the third test especially. Dev and Willis are fine bowlers but I think my openers are better tasked to facing them than Aravinda and Navjot are to mine. Croft and Marshall with their venom and mean speed will cause those two problems simply because these conditions aren't what they are used to. Aravinda's average in England is greatly inflated by one innings.

ff458d17745a3b2f7b234cc12c1aaa2c.png


Navjot has a small sample size of 3 matches where he averaged 11.20. I am confident my team will have them both out for cheap. On the contrary my batsmen are better suited for seaming conditions. Lawry averages 45.77 in 14 Ashes tests in England. Fleming averages 37.88 over 10 tests which while not great it is not inflated either. So I back Lawry to dig in and when Fleming goes we'll have Dravid (68.80 over 13 matches) and KP in home conditions. That surely puts advantage to me since my middle order will have a foundation to work on whereas Lara and Inzamam with albeit good records in these conditions will have to come in early to rebuild, which is no easy feat when the opposition bowlers have fired early. Steve Waugh is a legend and one of my favourite cricketers so I won't say anything against him. He's absolute class.

While my opponent has Bob Willis who is in familiar conditions, I have Stuart Broad who can be lethal. As a third seamer there isn't much pressure so he can come in and bowl freely.
 
McKen`ie is being completely overlooked here? he is my opening pair bowler with Willis and Dev is first change. McKenzie is the best bowler here on flat wickets and a new ball bowler, how can you overlook that when I have written about him extensively?
 
McKen`ie is being completely overlooked here? he is my opening pair bowler with Willis and Dev is first change. McKenzie is the best bowler here on flat wickets and a new ball bowler, how can you overlook that when I have written about him extensively?

My mistake. Apologies. McKenzie is indeed a fine bowler by the sounds of it. That said I still believe my team will hold its own on the flat pitch, at least get a draw because my top order is solid and I bat deep. On the spinning track you have the best spinner but both our batting units are strong players of spin. My strategy is playing the patient game as stated. And the third test I believe I'm in control due to the top order batting as stated. Amarnath at 3 averages 30 in England, has been dismissed by Marshall six times. The three following them are formidable but I believe they'll be coming in earlier than hoped for because of their comparative struggles in seaming conditions.
 
Boycott has the better team IMO.

His batting line up isn't as good (but it's close), but his bowling attack is excellent.

Marshall is the GOAT. Croft, Broad and MacGill are also very, very good bowlers.
 
I definitely fancy myself on the spinners wicket and the flat wicket. The seamers pitch, I am confident I can bag a draw as it would be a close game and if I needed to bat it out, I am confident I can do that. Here is a piece on Amaranth for anyone that is interested:

One almost lost count of the number of times he got hit, frequently on the head and with near fatal consequences. Yet, down the line he was hailed as the best player of fast bowling. He fearlessly hooked the fastest West Indian bowlers in their backyard, scoring nearly 600 runs in five Caribbean Tests at 66.44. During that phase, Sunil Gavaskar even proclaimed him as the best batsman of the world. And within a year he came back to India to score one solitary run against the same set of bowlers in six innings, averaging 0.16. He rose like again like a phoenix, as he had done throughout his career, almost recapturing his full glory. And yet again, in his final series in 1987-88, against the same old West Indian foes, he was little more than an abject embarrassment to himself and his fans.

Amarnath is almost synonymous in Indian cricket with guts and grit, spirit and spunk. He is also the face that appears with Kapil Dev, holding aloft the Prudential Cup — the tournament that changed Indian cricket forever. And he played a pivotal part in that triumph, with Man of the Match awards in both the semi-final and the final.

In those days, when television had just started to beam live pictures of Test matches in Pakistan and the World Cup in England, Amarnath captured the imagination of the country when he frequently ended up as the last man standing. The nation watched spellbound as he held firm in Pakistan against a rampaging Imran Khan. They revelled and rejoiced as he carried India to the epochal victory in the World Cup final. In between filtered in the news of his heroic exploits on the fiery wickets of West Indies against four fearsome bowlers. It was rumoured that he got hit, washed blood from his shirt and resumed his innings. Some said he hit the first ball that he faced after resumption for six. The legend grew.

However, the Amarnath Indians saw at home after that was often infuriatingly unsuccessful — often mystifyingly so. He never quite carried the glamour of his 1982-83 period to the later days — and by then the focus of the nation had once again shifted to the saga of Sunil Gavaskar and Kapil Dev.

Ups and downs and comebacks

Even now, if one is asked to recall Amarnath’s career, those two series in Pakistan and West Indies stand out — along with the tour de force in the World Cup. The memories of a 19-year career often bafflingly get restricted to one golden season and a half. And of course, he is also remembered as the Frank Sinatra of cricket — the master of comebacks. Every time he was ousted from the team, he came back to prove himself at the top level over and over again. That added to his aura, his lore.

In popular Indian methods of analysis, bravado followed by frequent axing in turn followed by triumphant returns hint at serial victimisation. This perception is enhanced by the family heirloom of controversy, where the sins against his father, the great Lala Amarnath, are well remembered. Did the son also suffer due to the conflicts endured and enhanced by the father? It is easy enough to fall prey to this belief. And then, of course, there was the parting shot fired by Mohinder Amarnath himself, when in a hasty statement he branded the selectors a “bunch of jokers”. In those pre-internet days, few would check to see that he had scored 56 runs at 11.20 in his last series against the West Indies, and had one 50 and an average of 23 in the last 14 innings encompassing nine Tests.

Whether he was victimised or not may not be that easy to answer. In the serpentine paths of Indian cricket, there are too many blind alleys. But as we trace his career we may be able to see that the unique twists and turns of Amarnath’s career were dictated much by his own sinusoidal periods of near-greatness and weird capitulations than by whims of the wise men on the panel.

It was more as a seamer who could bat that he travelled to the most ridiculously planned ‘twin-tour’ covering two extremities of the world. Brother Surinder scored a century on debut at Auckland. Amarnath batted decently down the order, starting with a valiant 64. He was handy with the ball too. At Christchurch in the second Test, he finished with career-best figures of 4 for 63, while Madan Lal accounted for five more batsmen — pace bowlers picking up nine of the 10 wickets was rare in those pre-Kapil Dev days.

However, by this time, he was quickly discovering that batting was his forte. His bowling, military medium at best, would become gentler and gentler till turning almost apologetic by the 80s.

It was the West Indian leg of the tour that witnessed the first chapter of Amaranth’s bravura. Pushed up the order to No 3, he hit a nonchalant 85 in the historic triumph at Port of Spain when India chased down over 400 runs in the fourth innings. And then he counter-attacked with fearless daring against the near bodyline bowling of Michael Holding and Wayne Daniel at Jamaica, hitting three sixes in his 60 as India called off their innings at 97 in the midst of a bloodbath.

After a disappointing series against England in 1976-77 at home, he went to Australia the following season to earn a name as India’s best bat after Sunil Gavaskar and Gundappa Viswanath. He amassed 445 runs in five Tests, including 90 and 100 on a pacy Perth rectangle against an attack spearheaded by Jeff Thomson. During his Perth knocks, he hooked with gay abandon, and was hit so painfully on the jaw by Thomson and Sam Gannon that he could eat only ice-cream during lunch.

He ended the series with a valiant 86 at Adelaide as India tried to chase down 493 and lost by 47 runs to be defeated 3-2 in the series. True, most of the Australian stars were away in Kerry Packer’s World Series Cricket, but the Indian performance was heart-warming. Amarnath stood out as the most promising batsman of the new generation.

And then he started getting hit.

Imran Khan struck him in Pakistan, knocking him unconscious with a furious bouncer that had Mushtaq Mohammad rushing up with morbid concern. When Kim Hughes’s Australians visited India in late 1979, Amarnath walked out to bat in Bombay wearing Sola topee to counter the pacemen. It was as if the shadow of Lala Amarnath had emerged yet again, under the same headgear worn a generation back. Amarnath’s obstinacy in refusing to wear the helmet in spite of this alarming succession of head blows was unfathomable, and can perhaps be linked to the censure of his father that followed each injury. In Bombay, he played the hook off Rodney Hogg, missed and fell in a heap on the stumps. This time, it looked curtains for him.

It was discovered that the blow by Hadlee had affected his eye-sight, and for a temporary period he had to wear eye-glasses. But, the dismal results against England and Australia meant that it would be a while before the Indian selectors would consider him again. By the end of the 1979-80 season, Dilip Vengsarkar had settled down at one drop, Sandeep Patil and Yashpal Sharma had made their respective debuts. Amarnath was left in the wilderness. He did not make it to the team for Australia and New Zealand in 1980-81, and missed the Tests against England at home in 1981-82 and during India’s return tour in the summer of 1982.

That same season, Amarnath was playing in the Lancashire League for Crompton after four seasons with Lowerhouse. All the while, he was busy working on a new stance, chest open, two-eyed, crouching, in line with Ken Barrington. Just before going to England he had scored 185 against Karnataka, helping Delhi overcome the mammoth 705 run first innings total set by the southern state. When the next season started he took North Zone to the Duleep Trophy title scoring 207 against East Zone and following it up with 80 and 67 not out against West Zone in the final. By the time he scored 127 in the Irani Trophy, his claims could not be ignored any longer. He was recalled when India toured Pakistan in late 1982.
 
Last edited:
Thus began Amarnath’s dream phase. This was a period of 11 Tests against the scariest of adversaries, when he virtually ruled the world with his bat. Imran Khan terrorised the Indian batsmen, Sarfraz Nawaz joined in the tale of demolition. One by one the Indian batsmen surrendered. They were on the backfoot in the first Test and lost the second, third and fourth. Batting under a helmet for the first time, Amarnath got 109 at Lahore, 78 at Faisalabad, 61 and 64 at Hyderabad, 120 in the fifth Test again at Lahore again and 103 not out at Karachi. Imran proclaimed that he was the best player of fast bowling in contemporary cricket.

When the team travelled to West Indies, this saga of brilliance continued. Against a rampaging attack of Malcolm Marshall, Michael Holding, Andy Roberts and Joel Garner, Amarnath scored 58 and 117 at Port of Spain, 90 and 81 at Bridgetown, and 54 and 116 at St John’s. India lost the series 2-0, but there was only one man fitting the image of a hero.

t is the second innings effort at Bridgetown that has down the years become part of folklore. It was Marshall who struck him this time, the sequence of events by now predictable. The ball was a scorching bouncer, Amarnath shaped for the hook and missed. Some teeth were knocked out. Blood trickled down onto his shirt. He retired hurt, and as he recovered, he supposedly washed the stains of blood from his shirt. And then he returned to play many more of the fearless hook shots. Such was the appeal of the spectacular counter attack that even a chronicler of Gideon Haigh’s stature, writing for The Age, was moved to pen the legend of his hooking the first ball from Holding for six after resumption. As ever so often happens with romantic cricketing tales, the scoreboard, the ass according to Neville Cardus, is a spoilsport. In the second innings, Amarnath did not hit a six either before or after his injury. But the valour is not reduced by this factual accuracy. It remains a sterling effort.

Amarnath’s phenomenal scoring earned the ultimate praise when Viv Richards remarked: “I have not seen anyone play the Windies pace quartet with the mastery Amarnath demonstrated.” Michael Holding analysed his success as: “What separated Jimmy from the others was his great ability to withstand pain … A fast bowler knows when a batsman is in pain. But Jimmy would stand up and continue.”

Amarnath, the all-rounder, emerged the hero of India’s finest hour in cricket – the 1983 World Cup triumph. With his resolute batting at number three and his almost self-effacing bowling, he played pivotal roles in both the semi-final and final. His unplayable delivery to Mike Gatting was as important as his 46 when India chased a modest England total. In the final he took 80 balls to score his 26, but was a calming influence at the wicket which allowed Krishnamachari Srikkanth to go for his shots. And then with his amiable medium pace, delivered almost as an afterthought after half-stopping on the way, he picked up three of the last four wickets for just 12 runs. Kapil Dev raised the cup and Mohinder Amarnath was on the top of the cricket world
 
Last edited:
Aravinda as an opener???

Had to sacrifice a player to play there but he's talented enough and my batting is more than strong enough to allow him to play out of position.

@Skills

Explain how his batting is close to mine? Lara, Waugh, Inzy? what about Devs batting record v Windies? I think I comfortably beat him there. His only GOAT there id Dravid.. rest are flaky by my standards.

Bowling wise if Willis was West Indian would he be rated better than Croft? Willis single handedly led England bowling attack for years and had to rely on Botham helping out when he was in the mood.

Thirdly Broad and MacGill are massive weak links here. Simply not good enough against the calibre of my batsmen. Broad has awful figures on flat pitches, MacGill has been destroyed by Lara and I struggle to see how he'd succeed v Sidhu, Silva, Inzy, Waugh. These guys can pummel Warne/Murali.. they'll eat MacGill for breakfast.
 
Had to sacrifice a player to play there but he's talented enough and my batting is more than strong enough to allow him to play out of position.

@Skills

Explain how his batting is close to mine? Lara, Waugh, Inzy? what about Devs batting record v Windies? I think I comfortably beat him there. His only GOAT there id Dravid.. rest are flaky by my standards.

Bowling wise if Willis was West Indian would he be rated better than Croft? Willis single handedly led England bowling attack for years and had to rely on Botham helping out when he was in the mood.

Thirdly Broad and MacGill are massive weak links here. Simply not good enough against the calibre of my batsmen. Broad has awful figures on flat pitches, MacGill has been destroyed by Lara and I struggle to see how he'd succeed v Sidhu, Silva, Inzy, Waugh. These guys can pummel Warne/Murali.. they'll eat MacGill for breakfast.

Firstly, what standard are you holding regarding my batsmen? Surely if it were by GOAT standard yours bar Lara are flaky too. Steve Waugh is not a brilliant batsman, an Aussie great but not a GOAT category batsman. Neither are Inzamam, Aravinda or Navjot. Lawry and Pietersen are proven in all conditions.

Secondly Willis is a great fast bowler - single-handedly led the attack though is revisionism. Jon Snow, Tony Greig, Chris Old, Graham Dilley, Ian Botham played with him as pacers and all passed 100 test wickets each. Underwood and Emburey as spinners. He was not carrying the attack the way Hadlee did for NZ for instance.

"Broad has awful figures on flat pitches" - did well in UAE which is as flat as you get. I know he took tonkings in India and SL but he is also playing in an era of flat pitches universally and has come out alright. He's also going to be support cast for Marshall and Croft who did well on flat pitches. With respect are Navjot, Aravinda, Inzamam better than the batsmen Broad has faced? Their careers aren't far apart at all.

KP, Dravid, Azhar have dominated Warne/Murali. I don't see your point here.
 
Last edited:
Also would be nice to have more participation from other drafters. Both of us have put in a lot of detail into this so some outside opinions would be appreciated.
 
Had to sacrifice a player to play there but he's talented enough and my batting is more than strong enough to allow him to play out of position.

@Skills

Explain how his batting is close to mine? Lara, Waugh, Inzy? what about Devs batting record v Windies? I think I comfortably beat him there. His only GOAT there id Dravid.. rest are flaky by my standards.

Bowling wise if Willis was West Indian would he be rated better than Croft? Willis single handedly led England bowling attack for years and had to rely on Botham helping out when he was in the mood.

Thirdly Broad and MacGill are massive weak links here. Simply not good enough against the calibre of my batsmen. Broad has awful figures on flat pitches, MacGill has been destroyed by Lara and I struggle to see how he'd succeed v Sidhu, Silva, Inzy, Waugh. These guys can pummel Warne/Murali.. they'll eat MacGill for breakfast.

If Inzamam is counted as a GOAT, KP should be too because he was quite easily a better batsman. You do have another legitimate great there in Steve Waugh, but his openers are better. Aravinda has opened once, and only played another 6 games at the 3 spot. I don't see how that works.

I don't think see MacGil as anymore of a weak link than Qadir, and Dravid, KP and Azhar are also terrific players of spin. KP has also butchered Warne and Murali at times.

I also see Broad as far from a weak link, I've watched him for years and he's a great bowler. He's bowled some of the most destructive spells I've ever seen from an English bowler. His overall stats aren't very flattering, but that's simply because he was a kid when he broke through. He's been much better in the last 5 years. His record in UAE and the flat decks of Australia are also respectable. His numbers in Sri Lanka and India are poor, but it's 3 matches in India and 2 in Sri Lanka.
 
VIDEO OF MY BOWLERS...













 
If Inzamam is counted as a GOAT, KP should be too because he was quite easily a better batsman. You do have another legitimate great there in Steve Waugh, but his openers are better. Aravinda has opened once, and only played another 6 games at the 3 spot. I don't see how that works.

I don't think see MacGil as anymore of a weak link than Qadir, and Dravid, KP and Azhar are also terrific players of spin. KP has also butchered Warne and Murali at times.

I also see Broad as far from a weak link, I've watched him for years and he's a great bowler. He's bowled some of the most destructive spells I've ever seen from an English bowler. His overall stats aren't very flattering, but that's simply because he was a kid when he broke through. He's been much better in the last 5 years. His record in UAE and the flat decks of Australia are also respectable. His numbers in Sri Lanka and India are poor, but it's 3 matches in India and 2 in Sri Lanka.

Broad plays in an era of weak batsmen. I too am an England fan and he has come along way but me and Anderson are nowhere near the class of the 90's bowlers and he is definitely not in the class of a Willis or able to get the likes of Lara etc out when they're at their peak. He is easy pickings and MacGill is proven easy pickings v Lara. Lara I think actually holds the world record for most runs scored off a single bowler v MacGill (441) - not sure but he does average 100+ v him.

KP agreed, quality player of spin but his biggest weakness has been Saeed Ajmal who has dismissed him 5 times and made him look stupid a lot. He will struggle here v Ajmal.
 
@Raees Saeed Ajmal is a known chucker. He'd be no balled in the draft.

Broad playing in an era of weak batsmen???? This is THE era for batsmen because of flat pitches
 
Firstly, what standard are you holding regarding my batsmen? Surely if it were by GOAT standard yours bar Lara are flaky too. Steve Waugh is not a brilliant batsman, an Aussie great but not a GOAT category batsman. Neither are Inzamam, Aravinda or Navjot. Lawry and Pietersen are proven in all conditions.

Secondly Willis is a great fast bowler - single-handedly led the attack though is revisionism. Jon Snow, Tony Greig, Chris Old, Graham Dilley, Ian Botham played with him as pacers and all passed 100 test wickets each. Underwood and Emburey as spinners. He was not carrying the attack the way Hadlee did for NZ for instance.

"Broad has awful figures on flat pitches" - did well in UAE which is as flat as you get. I know he took tonkings in India and SL but he is also playing in an era of flat pitches universally and has come out alright. He's also going to be support cast for Marshall and Croft who did well on flat pitches. With respect are Navjot, Aravinda, Inzamam better than the batsmen Broad has faced? Their careers aren't far apart at all.

KP, Dravid, Azhar have dominated Warne/Murali. I don't see your point here.

Inzamam is regarded by Pakistani's as second only to Miandad and best batsmen v pace, he will eat Broad alive and will hold his own v the others if in peak form. Aravinda is second after Sangakara, so yes with respect he is better than all your batsmen bar Dravid.. on form, he is more talented than any of your batsmen regardless if he is opening. Inconsistency is a weakness for him granted but he can make McGrath and Donald look stupid when he is flowing.

Navjot is not better than your openers, but even though he is not a big name.. he's a superstar v spin and proven against Pak/WI fast bowling attacks. Averages 42 overall, so he is no mug.

Jon Snow was 30 in 1971, barely a major factor during the 70s, Greig was medium pace/off break, Old and Dllley are hardly Holding/Roberts/Marshall/Garner.

Chris Old - There is little doubt that he would have played more Test cricket had he not been so prone to injuries. He already had surgery on both of his knees during 1970 and 1971 before making his England debut in 1972. Despite being a fine natural athlete, and possessing a natural sideways on action, he was continually hampered by regular injury problems and had a tendency to fall prey to 'niggles' in his back and legs, to such an extent that the first bowling machine installed at Lord's was nicknamed Chris Old, due to a propensity for breaking down so often.[2] His departure from the field later in his career to the physiotherapist's table became part of cricket folklore.[1] He never completed any of the ten series that he played abroad, and his only ever-present home series was against India and Pakistan in 1974, when in six Tests he took twenty five wickets at twenty two apiece, just emphasising what might have been under different circumstances.

Dilley:
His bowling style often fascinated many, with his unusual run-up a topic of discussion. It is believed that he tried to adopt the Jeff Thomson's slingy bowling style, and later Dilley's style was used by Chris Cairns in New Zealand.

In 1988, when talking about the effects of coaching fast bowlers, Geoffrey Boycott commented, "Remember what happened to Graham Dilley, who started out as a genuinely quick bowler. They started stuffing line and length in his ear and now he has Dennis Lillee's action with Denis Thatcher's pace. Another inconsistent bowler who was not a proper strike partner for Willis and only came to the fore post 1986 after Willis was an OAP.
 
@Raees Saeed Ajmal is a known chucker. He'd be no balled in the draft.

Broad playing in an era of weak batsmen???? This is THE era for batsmen because of flat pitches

Don't give me that chucker nonsense because guys like Akhtar and Murali would be in trouble too. Discuss the match up for what it is and KP would struggle no doubt. Personally I think he's been treated unfairly and I dislike the ban on doosra's, makes the game less fun to watch.

I get Broad is playing on flat surfaces but you can't seriously be saying that has translated into higher skill levels for the batsmen because it hasn't. Their test averages are still pretty poor. Focus on this match up and if he is playing on a spin wicket and a flat one.. and he is up against Aravinda, lara, Inzy, Waugh.. he's going to get destroyed.
 
Don't give me that chucker nonsense because guys like Akhtar and Murali would be in trouble too. Discuss the match up for what it is and KP would struggle no doubt.

I get Broad is playing on flat surfaces but you can't seriously be saying that has translated into higher skill levels for the batsmen because it hasn't. Their test averages are still pretty poor.

It's not nonsense. A chucker and a fixer are in this game. There's a reason Ajmal went as late as he did in the draft. Broad is adequate support for Croft and Marshall. He will fulfill his role. I don't rate Sidhu, and Aravinda as an opener is a folly. You have a good team. If you win this, you can win it all with the right reinforcements.
 
Inzamam is regarded by Pakistani's as second only to Miandad and best batsmen v pace, he will eat Broad alive and will hold his own v the others if in peak form. Aravinda is second after Sangakara, so yes with respect he is better than all your batsmen bar Dravid.. on form, he is more talented than any of your batsmen regardless if he is opening. Inconsistency is a weakness for him granted but he can make McGrath and Donald look stupid when he is flowing.

Navjot is not better than your openers, but even though he is not a big name.. he's a superstar v spin and proven against Pak/WI fast bowling attacks. Averages 42 overall, so he is no mug.

Jon Snow was 30 in 1971, barely a major factor during the 70s, Greig was medium pace/off break, Old and Dllley are hardly Holding/Roberts/Marshall/Garner.

Chris Old - There is little doubt that he would have played more Test cricket had he not been so prone to injuries. He already had surgery on both of his knees during 1970 and 1971 before making his England debut in 1972. Despite being a fine natural athlete, and possessing a natural sideways on action, he was continually hampered by regular injury problems and had a tendency to fall prey to 'niggles' in his back and legs, to such an extent that the first bowling machine installed at Lord's was nicknamed Chris Old, due to a propensity for breaking down so often.[2] His departure from the field later in his career to the physiotherapist's table became part of cricket folklore.[1] He never completed any of the ten series that he played abroad, and his only ever-present home series was against India and Pakistan in 1974, when in six Tests he took twenty five wickets at twenty two apiece, just emphasising what might have been under different circumstances.

Dilley:
His bowling style often fascinated many, with his unusual run-up a topic of discussion. It is believed that he tried to adopt the Jeff Thomson's slingy bowling style, and later Dilley's style was used by Chris Cairns in New Zealand.

In 1988, when talking about the effects of coaching fast bowlers, Geoffrey Boycott commented, "Remember what happened to Graham Dilley, who started out as a genuinely quick bowler. They started stuffing line and length in his ear and now he has Dennis Lillee's action with Denis Thatcher's pace. Another inconsistent bowler who was not a proper strike partner for Willis and only came to the fore post 1986 after Willis was an OAP.

You've missed the point. Willis didn't carry the attack as you said. And for those two to get 100+ test wickets is just a testament to their talent with their injuries/troubles.

KP betters Aravinda statistically. Lawry does. Fleming does. Azhar not far behind. What relevance has Sanga got?

Croft in his limited test career had exceptional numbers. With the original fab four he stood out while having greats sharing the ball. That counts on his part that he dominated in his games surely?

You seem to have this idea all your players will hit peak form and mine will flounder. So can mine.

I think my batting attack if it sees off the threat of Marshall can pummel the remainder of his bowling attack and I would be looking to post 500+ with that batting lineup if all are at their peak.

See of Marshall and pummel bowlers with low economies, great accuracy, speed, spin above their career mean. Yeah right.

Easier said than done.
 
@Boycott least we've sparked some life into this match up now.

:devil:

I don't mean to come across heated btw. We've both got good sides and acknowledged that in our write-ups. As I said earlier would be good for more neutrals to join the discussion as ultimately they vote. Apart from ourselves only three others have put their thoughts in.
 
:devil:

I don't mean to come across heated btw. We've both got good sides and acknowledged that in our write-ups. As I said earlier would be good for more neutrals to join the discussion as ultimately they vote. Apart from ourselves only three others have put their thoughts in.

No it's good dw probably comes across as heated because I'm having to argue with three posters and none of my voters said a word. Going sleep now but good luck tomorrow.
 
Aravinda opening here reminds me of India's opening batting unit of late 90's where we tried to fix in with Dravid/Laxman as opener and most would know how that went,if its ODI they can get away with it but in test stage this would unsettle the batsmen coming in late and can be easily 10-2 against Marshall/Croft on any wkt for that matter.
As well i don't agree with Boycott reference on S.Waugh as no brilliant batsmen.
Australia in west indies 1994-95
http://www.espncricinfo.com/wisdenalmanack/content/story/153276.html
How did Australia do it? All discussion must start and finish with Steve Waugh, whose 429 runs at 107.25 represented the most courageous, passionate and decisive batting of his life. With his low-risk, keep-the-ball-along-the-ground game, Waugh scored 189 more than the next Australian - his brother, Mark - and 121 more than West Indies' most prolific batsman, Brain Lara. But his tour was laced with drama from the first day of the First Test, when he claimed a catch off Lara which, seemingly unbeknown to him, had touched the ground as he tumbled. As an unsavoury consequence, he was heckled every time he came to the crease, branded a cheat by local crowds, publicly chastised by Viv Richards and subjected to intimidatory phone calls in the small hours. In Trinidad, he had a verbal clash with Curtly Ambrose, who had to be restrained by captain Richie Richardson. During the final Test, he woke up to discover a security guard in search of some unsanctioned souvenirs.
 
Going to have to go with Boycott here.

Better openers, slightly inferior middle order and similar lower middle orders.

Bowling wise though he blows Raees out of the matches. Croft and Marshall are better than anything he has. Broad is quite good as well and will likely end up as one of the top 5 English bowlers by the time he's done. Macgill is very good and very underrated. I have no idea who Allen is though.

Dev and Willis are good but not quite at the same level of Croft and Marshall. Qadir is also but no better than Macgill. Ajmal I don't rate one bit.

Basically the bowling wins it for Boycott imo.