Stretford End Flags - A few facts

StrettyEndFlags

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
77
Have just read the thread about Stretford End Flags (SEF) and some of the stuff posted by people on there, FredTheREd especially is nothing short of slanderous.

Stretford End Flags (SEF) was set up in August in an attempt to replace the missing banners on the Stretford End. This was done after it basically looked poor against Debreceum and we didnt want this space turning into advertising. As individuals, we actually contributed to the intial collections for the Stretford End Flags and did not agree and received no consultation about their removal, as many of the contributors didnt (Infact no records of who donated/contributed were ever kept).

Stretford End Flags is made up of 5 match going fans, who have since been joined by 2 other fans (A web designer and a banner firm owner). Stretford End Flags, is not as you put it "Tufty", he is just one of 7 people involved.

Following the SEF set-up, MUFC released a statement calling for fans to submit banner designs and banners. This release by MUFC sprung us into action quicker than we intended, as we did not want to see club banners and "Anytown" St Georges crosses on this space.
The grpup sent an initial e-mail to Karen Shotbolt and Phil Townsend who allowed us to co-ordinate banners on the condition that designs would be passed by the club.
Details of our aims were put on rednews website and following this we were aslked by a United fan with a web company, if he could provide us with a website. This was done by him free of charge. We also received contact by a United fan with a banner making firm, who would do the banners for cost and has since provided a couple free of charge.
Stretford End Flags does not work with the club in any way.
The first banner design was sent to the club to see if it was OK (The We'll Never Die banner), this was passed by the club. Since then, no other designs have had pre-approval. The only contact the club has with MUFC is simply by dropping off the banners with the safety officer, as well as providing him with the fire safety certificates.
These certificates and the clubs insistance on them, caused the club not to allow any banners up for the City home game.
The club even offered to refund the cost of the "City, Blue nose day banner", but SEF refused this offer, as this banner was donated free of charge by the manufacturer.

Whilst SEF does not have any involvement or direct links with MUFC, its only inevitable that the club will look to promote our aims, as we are seeking to improve the atmosphere in Old Trafford. Our aims affect the club and the supporters. Whilst they have promoted our website with links from the official site, SEF have turned down appearances on MUTV as its not within the aims of the group.
The flag nights for Euro games was the idea of SEF, mainly due to all the advertising on the other tiers being covered by UEFA draping and allowing banners to be put up on other areas of the ground (The Reason the Keane banner was on the Scoreboard End for the Villareal game). Whilst this idea was supported by the club, it was all the idea of SEF.

SEF had made the Georgie Best banner, this was taken to West Ham, where their club stewards took it onto the edge of the pitch. This banner was dropped off at Old Trafford on the Monday to be put on the Stretford End.
On the Tuesday the group received an e-mail off the safety officer asking if it could be used as part of the on-pitch tribute, to which SEF said yes.
Later that day, the safety officer again conatcted SEF to see if Tufty and Fergus would attend the game as representatives of the fans and stand on the pitch with the banner. Tufty and Fergus declined this invitation and after consultation with the others, decided to give the opportunity to anyone who had donated to SEF. As a result 2 fans stood on the pitch, no mention was given that they were from SEF or that SEF had made the Georgie best banner.

SEF has found many people helpful. To date we have only paid for one banner, that was a result of another banner firm being run by reds, who discounted the price form £475 to approx £329 (Exact costs on homepage of website), other costs cover the hosting of the website server, approx £60 per year, although most of the website cost was covered by the DVD trial scheme, which will also fund the groups PO box when set up (Currently using Rednews PO BOX, which Barney kindly donated short term use of).

The groups aims are to get other things in place to improve the Old Trafford atmosphere. Just beacuse we are looking at getting card murals etc in place, this does not mean that we work with the club. The only involvement MUFC would have in this, is letting us in the ground to set this up.
The same way they allow the fanzines to sell outside OT, doesnt mean the fanzines work with MUFC.

As for some of the comments in the other thread about Tufty, most of them are Urban myths and twisted facts. Its easy to spread rumours on internet sites without checking out the facts.
For the record, Tufty helped arrange both "Not for Sale" marches at Old Trafford last season and also took a "Not for Sale" banner to many Home/Away/Europe United games last season.
He has never supported Leeds, is not a Scouser (Ok, he lives in Runcorn, but that is not part of Merseyside or Liverpool) and attended long before his dads firm had an executive box. Tufty is a season ticket holder, attends all home and away games and nearly all in Europe.
He may have challenged Shareholders United on some issues, but thats no reason to be banned by their site (Easier to ban people than answer their questions). He informs me that he never attempted to be part of FCUM, but did send some advice by e-mail during their set up (Tufty had previously worked as commercial manager for 18 months at Runcorn FC when they were in the Conference).
Tufty is just one person involved in SEF and any of his views on SU etc do not reflect the rest of the group, he is entitled to his opinion as is anyone else.

I hope this has cleared up a few issues, any other questions can be asked on the SEF forum at www.stretfordendflags.com

(As for the anti-Glazer banners being made, do you really think the club would allow them to be put up? And, if they were put up, how long do youthink they would last?).

If you dont support SEF and dont want to donate towards them then fine, but there is a large number of people who still attend the games who do want banners etc in the ground and for Old Trafford to have some atmosphere. The donations we receive just help to achieve some of that.
 
So far, all donatons have either been made by Cheque or Paypal, with the odd few quid being handed in to SEF by people we know.
A record has been kept showing the name of every person who has donated and what ammount they have donated.
The DVD rental scheme tie-in also pays out in quaterly installments, this figure gets added to the total.
As stated, the only costs to date are £60 for the web server hosting and the money paid for the "Sent to me from heaven...." banner.
A PO Box is currently being set up and that will cost approx £54 a year.
The server and PO Box costs will be covered from money received from the DVD rental tie-in. (Basically SEF get £12.50 for every person who signs up for that DVD rental service. People can sign up for that for a months free trial, then cancel their memberhip before they get billed and we still receive the comission).
Every time a donation has been made via paypal, it automatically adds the ammount to the figure collected on the SEF homepage (Remember Paypal deducts a small percentage of the ammount donated as their service charge). Ammounts donated by cheque are also added to this figure manually. If a member of the SEF website forum has donated, they will have a "£" symbol under their username.

The only problem faced with keeping a record of who has donated what, will come if the group ever gets permission to hold a bucket collection at Old Trafford, as obviously anyone throwing in money, will not supply their name and ammount donated. However, its unlikely that we will be doing this in the near future.
 
Once again Fredthered and co. look like cnuts ... Well done SEF keep up the good work.
 
"A JCL, Leeds supporting Scouser" - A most heinous accuation to level against someone when it is a complete falsehood.

I don't think I'll ever forgive FredtheRed for that. Below the belt in the extreme.
 
StrettyEndFlags said:
So far, all donatons have either been made by Cheque or Paypal, with the odd few quid being handed in to SEF by people we know.
A record has been kept showing the name of every person who has donated and what ammount they have donated.
The DVD rental scheme tie-in also pays out in quaterly installments, this figure gets added to the total.
As stated, the only costs to date are £60 for the web server hosting and the money paid for the "Sent to me from heaven...." banner.
A PO Box is currently being set up and that will cost approx £54 a year.
The server and PO Box costs will be covered from money received from the DVD rental tie-in. (Basically SEF get £12.50 for every person who signs up for that DVD rental service. People can sign up for that for a months free trial, then cancel their memberhip before they get billed and we still receive the comission).
Every time a donation has been made via paypal, it automatically adds the ammount to the figure collected on the SEF homepage (Remember Paypal deducts a small percentage of the ammount donated as their service charge). Ammounts donated by cheque are also added to this figure manually. If a member of the SEF website forum has donated, they will have a "£" symbol under their username.

The only problem faced with keeping a record of who has donated what, will come if the group ever gets permission to hold a bucket collection at Old Trafford, as obviously anyone throwing in money, will not supply their name and ammount donated. However, its unlikely that we will be doing this in the near future.


So a record is kept, right.
 
A record is kept of every penny donated to date and will continue to be.

As mentioned above, any bucket collection or similar activity where monies are randomly collected, will be a different matter and will just have to be recorded as one lump sum.

All paypal donation e-mails are kept, this also shows paypals percentage taken, so actual figure we get.
The bank account requires 2 seperate signatures on all cheques.
All invoices for flags are kept.

The figures on the www.stretfordendflags.com homepage show what has been collected and what has been spent. It also, shows that £400 has been set aside for a Munich tribute banner. This will be a large banner that will be up for the Fulham game on the 4th Feb. Will probably cover up a few of the existing banners for that game (Not the original Flowers banner). Then a decision will be made on what happens to it after that game re-loaction etc).
Obviously if donations continue to come in, then more can be set aside for the Munich Babes banner.
Designs and ideas from the fans are also being sought for this banner on the Stretford End Flags website or can be sent in via the PO Box.
 
Well done Stretty, I always enjoy the flags on TV.

Hope you and the lads keep up the good work!
 
:lol: @ GUBU.

Did you watch the programme about Kerr last night Keane16? I missed it, heard he came across as a right twat on it. Everyone else's fault of course, nothing to do with him.
 
fadas said:
:lol: @ GUBU.

Did you watch the programme about Kerr last night Keane16? I missed it, heard he came across as a right twat on it. Everyone else's fault of course, nothing to do with him.

Nope, didn't see it...wouldn't surprise me if he didn't cover hmself in glory though. Once the media moved in, he looked lost in fairness to him. He started it as well...but they minced him. Feel sorry for the guy to be honest, it's hit him hard I'd say.
 
Diego Forlans Headband said:
are you fredthereds girlfriend???

I'm a bloke... and I don't know Fredthered from Adam, but I have been drunk quite a bit in the last few days so I don't know?... my arse is sore, but I was putting that down to curry! Don't remember if my underpants were on backwards when I woke up with a hangover so... dunno?
 
may1999 said:
Yianni

You are a NOB!!!!!

Why, because SEF is doing something good for the club and the supporters and is making alot of sense ... ? unlike some on here who spout their usual drivel and seek to crucify those who do not follow their criteria ... :wenger:
 
Yianni said:
Why, because SEF is doing something good for the club and the supporters and is making alot of sense ... ? unlike some on here who spout their usual drivel and seek to crucify those who do not follow their criteria ... :wenger:

1) Because the old flags were taken down as a boycott

2) Because their are questions about SEF's independence from the club

3) Because the flags are shite

4) Because Tuffty is WUM cnut

I agree if you don't know Tuffty/SEF then it seems harsh...if you do...it doesn't
 
ladybarnred said:
1) Because the old flags were taken down as a boycott

2) Because their are questions about SEF's independence from the club

3) Because the flags are shite

4) Because Tuffty is WUM cnut

I agree if you don't know Tuffty/SEF then it seems harsh...if you do...it doesn't

1) Who's fault/problem is that? While some feel the need to take them down, others now want to replace them. The 2000-3000 united supporters who left the club are not the voice of every single united supporter. So get used to being the minority.

2) Even if they were working along side the Glazer's ... it's not like they are ignoring their main objective ... which is putting up new banner's to improve the atmosphere.

3) Why do those who left the club care? Shouldn't be of their concern anymore.

4) Do not judge those you have not met. I think SEF has justified pretty well above on this issue and that on point 3.
 
Yianni said:
1) Who's fault/problem is that? While some feel the need to take them down, others now want to replace them. The 2000-3000 united supporters who left the club are not the voice of every single united supporter. So get used to being the minority.

2) Even if they were working along side the Glazer's ... it's not like they are ignoring their main objective ... which is putting up new banner's to improve the atmosphere.

3) Why do those who left the club care? Shouldn't be of their concern anymore.

4) Do not judge those you have not met. I think SEF has justified pretty well above on this issue and that on point 3.

fair enough!... send him a load of money then!

Except point 3... who said I'd left the club? "Do not judge those you have not met"
 
2 of the Old banners on the Stretford End now, with another 2 set to go up once they get rotated again. However, the old banners are in that bad of a condition, shabby and full of holes, its hard to put them all up without a repair job.

The fans who took the old banners down, did not consult anyone over this, simply acted on their own opinion.
Would they rather have adverts up there or club co-ordinated banners?
The old banners are there to symbolise the fans, nothing more, nothing less and those fans turn up week in and week out.

There is no working alongside the club. Would be easy if there was, perhaps they could fund the production.
SEF is an independant fans group, run by fans, for the fans.

One of the benefits with SEF is that all members get a vote on decisions.
New banner designs are taken from those submitted, with the top few entries being put up for the vote and made.
If you think they are shite, simple, submit a design yourself.

SEF has no more involvement with MUFC than any match going fan and attendance figures show that over 63,000 Manchester United fans attend every game.

As for ladybarnred, I doubt he's ever met Tufty and bases his opinion on mythical information that comes from bullshit internet posts.
As pointed about above, tufty is just one of several fans involved in SEF. fans who attend every game home and away and in Europe.
If fans are boycotting or staying away, then this issue does not effect them, as they are not part of the Old Trafford atmosphere.

If anyone wishes to donate, then donations can be made on-line via www.stretfordendflags.com simply follow the donate links on the left hand side. The more money collected, the more can be done.
A banner costs £400. A large super flag will cost abut £3,000. Murals etc cost about £3,500 for one end alone.
If every matchgoing fan gave 31 then a lot could be achieved. The supporters of foreign clubs all pay and donate towards their displays.
 
ladybarnred said:
fair enough!... send him a load of money then!

Except point 3... who said I'd left the club? "Do not judge those you have not met"

I did not say 'you' left the club. I'm speaking in general.
 
Seems fair enough to me.

I dont go to OT anymore and I havent put a penny in to Glazers pocket since he got in, not because I want to send the club under, just because I cant bare to, and theres nothing I bought from the club other than tickets anyway.

However, the boycotters, or bandwagon jumpers in Very Ruuds case, argument is pathetic. Wont advertisement get more money in for Glazer than a few banners?

Aand the question still remains unanswered...who is worse in the eyes of those outraged by SEF - those who are putting up the banners or those who are still going to OT? Isnt it the same principle?

People have to accept not everyone feels the same way, 'individual decision' was preached but it seems that is being uncovered for the shabby facade it was. The extreme element of the boycotters clearly see themselves as Footballing martyrs, an elite. Well sorry, grow up.
 
VanNistelrater said:
Seems fair enough to me.

I dont go to OT anymore and I havent put a penny in to Glazers pocket since he got in, not because I want to send the club under, just because I cant bare to, and theres nothing I bought from the club other than tickets anyway.

However, the boycotters, or bandwagon jumpers in Very Ruuds case, argument is pathetic. Wont advertisement get more money in for Glazer than a few banners?

Aand the question still remains unanswered...who is worse in the eyes of those outraged by SEF - those who are putting up the banners or those who are still going to OT? Isnt it the same principle?

People have to accept not everyone feels the same way, 'individual decision' was preached but it seems that is being uncovered for the shabby facade it was. The extreme element of the boycotters clearly see themselves as Footballing martyrs, an elite. Well sorry, grow up.

fair point well made... my problem (and I supsect many others) with SEF is more personal (with Tufty) than idiological.
 
Ladybarn reds problem with Tufty, is that he made some valid questions with regards to SU. Rather than debating them or accepting the views of one of their members, he was simply banned from the SU forum and subsequently slagged off by people on there.

As a result, its now easy for these people to slag off SEF and create slanderous unfactual comments about Tufty.
you tend to find its the same people, saying the same things on various message boards, without any of them finding out any facts.

The opposition to SEF can be pinpointed to a small few.
This is reflected by only 3 negative e-mails the group has received since its formation in August.

Its time ths slagging off etc stopped.
If you dont support them, then dont comment on them.
If you want to donate, then simply donate.
All we are trying to do, is spread the word about what we are doing, how we are doing it and what we have done, as most of our PR has come via internet sites and for those matchgoing fans who dont read these sites, they dont know who are what we are about (A fact proven by the comments made to people when putting up some SEF posters around Old Trafford).
 
VanNistelrater said:
However, the boycotters, or bandwagon jumpers in Very Ruuds case, argument is pathetic. Wont advertisement get more money in for Glazer than a few banners?
feck off.
 
StrettyEndFlags said:
Ladybarn reds problem with Tufty, is that he made some valid questions with regards to SU. Rather than debating them or accepting the views of one of their members, he was simply banned from the SU forum and subsequently slagged off by people on there.

As a result, its now easy for these people to slag off SEF and create slanderous unfactual comments about Tufty.
you tend to find its the same people, saying the same things on various message boards, without any of them finding out any facts.

The opposition to SEF can be pinpointed to a small few.
This is reflected by only 3 negative e-mails the group has received since its formation in August.

Its time ths slagging off etc stopped.
If you dont support them, then dont comment on them.
If you want to donate, then simply donate.
All we are trying to do, is spread the word about what we are doing, how we are doing it and what we have done, as most of our PR has come via internet sites and for those matchgoing fans who dont read these sites, they dont know who are what we are about (A fact proven by the comments made to people when putting up some SEF posters around Old Trafford).


I reckon its time for certain people on this Forum to look at what you;ve said and put up - with verifiable comment - or apologise and then shut up

Innuendoes IMO are not acceptable
 
feck me Tufty you must be getting desperate if you now have to come beging on here for money

You used to call this place the lowest of the low now your fecked off from almost every where else now you want a leg you turn up here

Just surprised it took you so long to realise that there are some gullible people on here
 
Oh dear.

If SEF is so sure of his facts, why doesnt he ask Tufty, as many on SU, RI and the FCUM site have asked, when he started to go to OT, and who he supported before he joined the United clan.

Oddly enough he will refuse to answer. If none of the so called "urban myths" are true, then perhaps Tufty would like to reveal to the world the real answers, because he hasnt answered them everytime he has been asked before.

And as for him asking questions to SU, that isnt quite true. SU were talking about taking the case against Glazer to the government, to see if they could stop it. Tufty told them they shouldnt do that, and as a result he went on a one man crusade against SU, because they ignored his constant ramblings and vitriol.

In the end they banned him from their forum, he then went onto RI and started another campaign there.

His antics also include trying to stir up rows between Altrincham and FC United, which resulted in him being banned from both teams forums.

As Ladybarnred says, SEF isnt the problem here. Its there main spokesman that is the problem, and if Tufty werent such a clown and a two faced liar, then perhaps he would raise more support.

But in response to SEF can I ask the following questions/raise the following points

1) If the club has no say in what is put up, then why wont you get an anti Glazer banner done. David Gill has openly said he has no objections to peaceful protests, and as has already been proven, the banners can be taken to away games, so why do they not get an anti Glazer banner done, and take it to away games ? Glazer cannot control what happens at away games can he ? Is it a case of you arent allowed to, or more likely, you actually dont want to.

2) The banners taken down were not taken down by just a few fans, they were taken down by the people who owned them. The 29 years one in fact ended up at an FC United game after it was removed from OT. So can you clarify that you didnt go to them people and ask them if you could have those banners put back up ?

3) You claim you are not working with the club. Why did it take the plea from the club to spur you into action. Is it not the case that you saw the appeal from the club, and then decided to form the group. In which case, you are working directly in response to the club, and as such working with them.

4) If the planned "cards on seats" thing has nothing to do with the club, can you confirm that no approach has been made to Man United to see if they will allow it, and to ask for a seating plan to enable you to work out where those cards should go. You see, to myself and many others, the more you ask for from the club, the more it is deemed to be working with them, and the fact the club advertises you as something OFFICIALLY connected with the club, does suggest your communications with them are far greater than you make out.

Can you direct me to anywhere on your website, that refutes the fact you are working with the club. The club says you are. You say you arent, but has anyone told the club you do not want to be seen as an official supporters group connected directly with the club.


5) Why has it taken you 5 months to approach all the people on RedCafe for money. Tufty has been on every other site, ( and got himself banned in the process) asking for money, yet he chose to ignore this one. Now there is no where else to go to he has finally decided that RedCafe is a likely source of income. Why did he slag off RedCafe so much, and refuse to come here to ask for money ? Perhaps he is desperate because no one is actually paying in.

6) You claim you have nothing to do with Manchester United officially, yet the people who produce your banners have advertised that they provide Manchester United with banners. So the club says you are part of them, the manufacturer of the banners says he works with the club, and the only people who say its not the case is yourselves.........

Isnt this somewhat strange that EVERYONE seems to think you are working with the club, even the club themselves, and teh makers of the banners. The only people who say they arent are yourselves, and given Tufty is meant to be a complete anti-glazerite, surely he would want as much distance between himself and the club. Allowing the club and the makers of his banners to tell the world otherwise, just suggests he isnt that concerned about it.
 
Oh and for the record, the club has no say on the fanzines being sold outside OT, as that is nothing to do with them. THe police allow the selling of fanzines, like they do merchandise. THe club has no say in who can and cant sell unofficial merchandise along Sir Matt Busby way.

So you point that the fanzines could be perceived as working with the clubs because they sell them outside in utter crap.
 
On the Tuesday the group received an e-mail off the safety officer asking if it could be used as part of the on-pitch tribute, to which SEF said yes.
Later that day, the safety officer again conatcted SEF to see if Tufty and Fergus would attend the game as representatives of the fans and stand on the pitch with the banner. Tufty and Fergus declined this invitation and after consultation with the others, decided to give the opportunity to anyone who had donated to SEF. As a result 2 fans stood on the pitch, no mention was given that they were from SEF or that SEF had made the Georgie best banner.

You make it sound as though money for the banner was donated and then you was asked to put it on the pitch

Yet my recollection is that you was asking for money for the banner AND ALSO offering anyone who donated a chance to stand on the pitch yet now you are saying that you was only contacted by the club after the banner was made
And you insist that you have nothing to do with the club