Pscholes18
Full Member
Any sporting event that you think should not be considered part of the Olympics?
Athletics
Dressage. It's like Crufts for horses.
Both sports where you need a few quid to even start off in.
If you honestly believe that you know absolutely nothing about dressage.Dressage. It's like Crufts for horses.
I reckon they could jazz up the fencing by making them do part of it on a staircase with some bonus points available if you get the chandelier on the rope to fall near your opponent. A table piled with goblets and food should be made available for leaping onto as well..
Surfing is too unpredictable, there is already football. Rugby sevens is something though I feel should be there.And in costume. The Scarlet Pimpernel for GB. Zorro for the pueblo de Los Angeles.
Not sure why beach volleyball has made it yet surfing and 5 a side footie and rugby sevens haven't.
I reckon they could jazz up the fencing by making them do part of it on a staircase with some bonus points available if you get the chandelier on the rope to fall near your opponent. A table piled with goblets and food should be made available for leaping onto as well..
Here's an action shot from yesterday's heats :
Have you ever seen "Scaramouche"? It's my favourite swordfighting film ever.
If you honestly believe that you know absolutely nothing about dressage.
I understand completely if people not personally involved find it boring, but comparing it to Crufts is akin to regarding football as 'grown men running about kicking a bladder around'.
It's a fantastic sport, but I agree it's certainly not a spectator sport for the uninitiated.
Football
Tennis
Dressage (whatever that's meant to be)
Rowing
Sailing
Agreed. And sailing.
Both sports where you need a few quid to even start off in.
I understand completely if people not personally involved find it boring, but comparing it to Crufts is akin to regarding football as 'grown men running about kicking a bladder around'.
If you honestly believe that you know absolutely nothing about dressage.
I understand completely if people not personally involved find it boring, but comparing it to Crufts is akin to regarding football as 'grown men running about kicking a bladder around'.
It's a fantastic sport, but I agree it's certainly not a spectator sport for the uninitiated.
Anything that requires equipment other than shoes/gloves except throwing events.
I'm not keen on sports where developing nations obviously have no chance, like dressage or sailing. Running, throwing, lifting etc. are more universal. And if something does need equipment it shouldn't be anything to inacessable.
Kinda the opposite to your question but I always thought that if Archery is a sport worthy of Olympic status then darts should be too.
If you don't like the drinking culture that goes with it, don't serve drinks at the event, pretty simple.
What the feck is dressage? That sounds like something that goes on a salad to make it taste good. If it's the sport with horses then I agree.