Dans
Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Ditched by Spurs this morning. He could play in the hole couldn't he?
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>Should never have gone in the first place IMO Livvie. And Di Canio we should have bagged ages ago. We dont need some world star 3rd/4th IMO. Not for next season anyway.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Agreed. There's no room for a world class big name without demoting either Scholes or Giggs. I think a lot of people are ignoring this fact.
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>liv, he's passed his sell by date...anyone who's seen him play will tell ya that.
He was crap last year n'all. Moved away at the right time IMO.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Do you reckon he could still play a sub's role? And do you think quality team mates would make a difference.
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>jens thinks he's crap.... besides the market's flat..we can pick up quality players on the cheap....</strong><hr></blockquote>
Jens thinks many are crap, but 17 goals in the Bundesliga for an average team is what? Think about it. Most Barça supporters think he's a fantastic player when you talk with them also.
As I said, he's had is problems, but never with ability. He's Danish BTW. And it looks to me that he's finally getting back into it.
WTF, 2-3m, 17 goals (more with us I reckon) a season. Bargain. Let us put the money where it is needed more. On the wings, and on the backs. Maybe also on the keeper.
We play 4-5-1 anyway. And Solskjaer is more than capable of replacing Ruud (You are not going to find another one of him on the cheap). Scholes knocks in 20+, Giggzy 15is, plus the others. It's not a priority to find another 30+ bloke to play second fiddle to Ruud.
IMO of course.
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>missed my point, young weastey.
Fact is we can buy quality...for relatively cheap prices. Makaay and Paddy were just examples of players going cheap. btw Roy's off to Bayern for 10million Euros...</strong><hr></blockquote>
But you miss my point, you are putting money where it is not required at that level and could be put to a higher level in more important areas.
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>kewell, quaresma and a defender will do....imo.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Dont like the first
Never seen the second
The third is ambiguous
So I'm not the best to comment.
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>
But you miss my point, you are putting money where it is not required at that level and could be put to a higher level in more important areas.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I think a quality forward is needed.
We shall see what the Scottish Wizard does over the summer... my bet is he'll get a forward.
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>
I think a quality forward is needed.
We shall see what the Scottish Wizard does over the summer... my bet is he'll get a forward.</strong><hr></blockquote>
He will yes, but I do not think it will be a big name.
Originally posted by mr. destro:
<strong>rather have zola than many</strong><hr></blockquote>
Could be another option for me yes. How much?
Originally posted by United11:
<strong>Sheringham isn't the player he used to be.</strong><hr></blockquote>
He isn't with us is he? Players change dep... never mind.
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>What if Ruud gets injured??? I think we have to buy another quality foward. A di Canio or a Sheringham won't be good enough.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Definitely. But di Canio and Teddy on a free as well? I suppose the wage bill might put the mockers on that, but I'd imagine they wouldn't be that high - beggars not be choosers.
Bye the way Weaste - thanks for the novel. Get back to you later.
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>And in any case, we do not play 4-4-2 anymore, and none are as good as Ruud i that lone strikers role, Kliuvert especially would not cust th mustard. And also, neither would sit on the bench looking at their compatriot taking all of the glory. And also I believe that it is an insult to one of the best strikers in the game - one Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, who if let loose would score just as many as the both of them.
</strong><hr></blockquote>
I think Weaste is 100 per cent right. And if you remember the Turin game, Ole was superb playing the lone striker role. Admittedly, his size is against him, but he hasn't done badly when saddled with it before - it was Ole who kept us on track for the 2000/2001 title when he was the only striker available.
We need some added quality in attack, but bringing in a big name will mean what for Scholes or Giggs?