Anyone savvy on Soviet era history? what was their essential downfall? i see Putin is angry because they broke up in the early 90's and pride and whatnot, its kinda weird how Russia wants so much territory when half if not all of Russia is in poverty... i cant see another Soviet style collapse for Russia or Putin topping himself, as bad as he is, he isnt Hitler and he has more balls than that.
I've heard the SEALs are an elite fighting force.
If hypothetically a year from now the west starts bombing some random country and putin comes and lectures the world about peace and tolerance he would be rightly called out as a hypocrite.
What to you is whataboutism is for someone else a personal loss. Take off your western tinted glasses, the entire world isn't the west.
Many people outside of the west and russia lay the blame at both sides with varying degrees while westerners are claiming its entirely the fault of russia and russia claiming its entirely the fault of the west.Well done on equaling a guy who's more dangerous to his people than to other nations with flawed democracies.
You and that Fredo guy can go have a cup in the alternative thinking cafe and praise each other.
I think arming civilians might not be a good idea because of the following reasons:-
1. It makes the civilians a legitimate military target and lets face it they're not trained and many would needlessly die.
2. Russia could wrecklessly kill and claim civilians were armed while they might not actually be.
3. Russian troops could enter cities in civilian clothes and cause chaos from within.
I can see this ending badly.
This may be a better spot for gorilla fighters than SEALs.
Or even guerillas
Many people outside of the west and russia lay the blame at both sides with varying degrees while westerners are claiming its entirely the fault of russia and russia claiming its entirely the fault of the west.
I reckon both you and russia need to take of those tinted glasses before the world is dragged into a pointless nuke fest, this affects the world.
Why doesn't nato, russia and these smaller countries in between both of them sign agreements that they won't join nato if russia guarantees it won't invade them ? Russia wants a buffer between them and nato so i dont think they'll mind this arrangement. Imo there should be a buffer between countries having huge militaries and nukes. You (nato) shouldn't want a land border with russia because any small border misunderstanding could kick off a war where nukes are lobbed, trust me when i say this because we (India) are surrounded on two sides with hostile countries with nukes and every year we have skirmishes and exchange of artillery. You dont want that shit on an annual basis.
There we go! Hey, I was running with the theme.I prefer his idea. A squad of elite gorillas, led by the Klitschko brothers like the way Chris Pratt led those velociraptors in a documentary I saw.
He will kill many Ukrainians and innocent people will die in huge numbers but I am getting a feeling this is a war he can’t win. He won’t control 44 million people who hate him and with every day that passes he is under more and more pressure.
I didn't think of that.Probably because they had / are having civil unrest of their own and the army came down pretty hard on the general populace. If they left there’d be a revolution.
For years Putin cultivated this image of being a tough guy and some kind of alpha male chauvanist. Zelensky is the one who has courage and strength. He's the one protecting his people and history will remember him as a great leader.
And I reckon you like to push an agenda without knowing your audience. That's why I try not to disclose too much, so I get a laugh every time someone makes an assumption.Many people outside of the west and russia lay the blame at both sides with varying degrees while westerners are claiming its entirely the fault of russia and russia claiming its entirely the fault of the west.
I reckon both you and russia need to take of those tinted glasses before the world is dragged into a pointless nuke fest, this affects the world.
Or stay out of it and stay neutral cowards, like Sweden, say.How far back are we going here? I distinctly remember my granddad stuttering and struggling to speak about WW2 when silly child me asked him about what he did because we were learning about it at school.
Perhaps you guys on the continent can sort your own shit out for a change?
One leader was in the streets a few hours ago while the other is sitting in a hazmat suit.For years Putin cultivated this image of being a tough guy and some kind of alpha male chauvanist. Zelensky is the one who has courage and strength. He's the one protecting his people and history will remember him as a great leader.
Or stay out of it and stay neutral cowards, like Sweden, say.
Many people outside of the west and russia lay the blame at both sides with varying degrees while westerners are claiming its entirely the fault of russia and russia claiming its entirely the fault of the west.
I reckon both you and russia need to take of those tinted glasses before the world is dragged into a pointless nuke fest, this affects the world.
Really disturbing tbh. Most of them will die if fighting continues.Apparently it's a law in Ukraine now that 18-60 year old males cannot leave the country. If true, that seems wrong. If people want to stay and fight, that's their choice, and many will, but you shouldn't be forcing people to stay either.
If they didn’t then them all hope is lost. Why wouldn’t they fight for their country?I think arming civilians might not be a good idea because of the following reasons:-
1. It makes the civilians a legitimate military target and lets face it they're not trained and many would needlessly die.
2. Russia could wrecklessly kill and claim civilians were armed while they might not actually be.
3. Russian troops could enter cities in civilian clothes and cause chaos from within.
I can see this ending badly.
This a war for survival. Be under no illusion that 'normal' wishful thinking applies.Apparently it's a law in Ukraine now that 18-60 year old males cannot leave the country. If true, that seems wrong. If people want to stay and fight, that's their choice, and many will, but you shouldn't be forcing people to stay either.
I do remember reading a long time ago that Putin blamed the west and specifically America for sowing the ethinic divisions that went onto fragment the soviet union.(Not an expert at all)
Very very briefly:
Their economy stagnated in the mid-70s and started dropping in the 80s. The USSR and Warsaw Pact countries, including Poland, East Germany, the Baltic states, etc. were a multi-ethnic country/entity/group/empire. Tensions which had existed beforehand, erupted once standard of living started stagnating/dropping. In the Warsaw pact countries, the govts were overthrown by their own people. Within the USSR, where (from what I can tell) popular demands were less clear, the leaders of the constituent republics decided to split (into Russia, Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, etc).
Don't really see it as comparable to Russia now, which is multi-ethnic but not to the same extent, and I don't think it will split if Putin goes.
Well said.You seem to be trying to justify India's abstention by pointing to the wrongs of countries like the US and the UK.
While at the same time ignoring the fact that the Ukraine is not the US or the UK.
You say Russia was an ally in your struggles against a neighbouring bully, and have criticised other countries for not coming to India's aid.
But at the same time, you defend India for turning it's back on a country being bullied by a neighbour.
You'll go a distance to find someone on here who has been more critical of historical British wrongdoing than I have, but this isn't the thread or the time for it and it's merely yourself you are painting the hypocrite.
And one final point. It is not just a westerncentric thing, or an anti-Indian thing. Both Germany and Italy have been on the end of plenty of criticism for leaving themselves too exposed and reliant on Russian trade to focus on what is right.
India's neigbhours are china and pakistan, both have nukes and both have territorial claims over Indian territory and both have previously fought wars over it against India.
Russia has helped India previously while at times the west has acted against us. Russia continues to supply us with military hardware without which we'd be nowhere in the short term if china and pakistan decide to take advantage.
As i see it the west too has to share the blame for this useless and needless war. What was the need for nato to stoke the flames and try to get ukraine into the fold when everyone knows it would antagonize the russians ? Of course every soverign country should have a right to do whatever it wants but we dont live in an ideal world. If china placed nukes in sri lanka India would be antagonized and if India placed nukes in taiwan/vietnam then china would be mobilizing its military and so would the west if putin decided to place nukes in mexico/cuba etc.
This was a needless war stoked by old men in suits trying to feck with each other. No side is blameless here.
