Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

Only other ones I know of are some of their fighters that are able to perform buddy-buddy refuelings. I think it's the Mig-29 and some of the planes from the SU-27 family but i'm not certain. Those planes can of course carry very small amounts of fuel compared to a real tanker plane.
You could be right, the number does seen low though, maybe they have a quick change facility in something like IL76's where they can put essentially a giant tank in the hold and have a drogue type system - I might be wrong but didn't the US try something like that with C-130's?
 
UK has a top navy, and i assume a top airforce, thats quite sufficient.
The UK has a Navy comprising of a total of about 60 ships, most of which are tiny patrol types!

Or put another way, Britannia doesn't rule the waves!

The air force is better but has a fraction the number of aircraft it once had and some of those are actually leased!
 
You could be right, the number does seen low though, maybe they have a quick change facility in something like IL76's where they can put essentially a giant tank in the hold and have a drogue type system - I might be wrong but didn't the US try something like that with C-130's?
I don't know anything about that but there are many different versions of Hercules tankers, they are called KC-130 and are mainly used by the Marines.
 
The UK has a Navy comprising of a total of about 60 ships, most of which are tiny patrol types!

Or put another way, Britannia doesn't rule the waves!

The air force is better but has a fraction the number of aircraft it once had and some of those are actually leased!

Well, last i looked the UK was ranked at 4th best navy in the world, has to count for something.

Also, numbers alone isn't everything, let alone the most important thing, context matters.

You make it sound like UK basically don't have a navy, seems ridiculous.
 


Also the commander of the eastern group visited Bakhmut earlier today. Either they evacuate now or they decided to hold the city and turn it into Mariupol 2.0. They definetly could hold the city even surrounded for a couple of weeks probably and keep on inflicting massive losses to Wagner. But they'd lose all their heroic defenders in the end. We'll see his command pretty soon.
 
Last edited:
More on the previous post I wrote about Russian forces building trenches along the (western) coast of Crimea.



Some of those trenches would easily get flooded on the first high tide.
 
More on the previous post I wrote about Russian forces building trenches along the (western) coast of Crimea.



Some of those trenches would easily get flooded on the first high tide.


They also look really useless being right on the beach. If an amphibious assault would happen, these trenches would be taken at once.
 


Once said the listen to the old wise women, well not in Russia..

When you get all your news from the same place and they keep on pumping the same garbage out, well it's to be expected.
 
When you get all your news from the same place and they keep on pumping the same garbage out, well it's to be expected.

I can't decide between believing the Russian population is brain washed beyond hope and thinking that the public opinion will eventually reach a tipping point once the sanctions and war efforts start to hurt them personally. Sometimes it seems there's a silent majority who is against the war and sometimes you think that's actually a minority.

I also wonder how to deal with that in a future in which Russia has (hopefully) lost the war. Here in Germany, I think the occupation and associated awareness and information work did much to counter the extreme propaganda and brainwashing of the nazi time but that will obviously not happen with a nuclear power. So there will always be propagandist and right wing extremist building on that basis.
 
I can't decide between believing the Russian population is brain washed beyond hope and thinking that the public opinion will eventually reach a tipping point once the sanctions and war efforts start to hurt them personally. Sometimes it seems there's a silent majority who is against the war and sometimes you think that's actually a minority.

I also wonder how to deal with that in a future in which Russia has (hopefully) lost the war. Here in Germany, I think the occupation and associated awareness and information work did much to counter the extreme propaganda and brainwashing of the nazi time but that will obviously not happen with a nuclear power. So there will always be propagandist and right wing extremist building on that basis.
There's really no way to say at the moment, with no independent sociological institutions left in the country and the war-time censorship with criminal consequences for saying stuff out of line being introduced. But from the subjective point of view it feels less and less possible that this constriction is going to fall down any time soon. My most realistic way of communicating with general public outside my own little bubble is a sports news website and at there are certainly way more aggressively pro-War, anti-Ukrainian comments there than there were, say, a year ago.

And yeah, I have no idea how we're going to deal with all that shit when the war (and, hopefully, the regime) is over.
 
Fantastic 2 part documentary about the first year of the war by Ukrainian journalist Dmytro Komarov including interviews with Zelensky and many of the top generals.

Part 1 focuses the defensive operations around Kyiv in the first months of the war.
Part 2 shows the liberation of Kharkiv and Kherson among many other things.

It's in Ukrainian but English subtitles are available.


 
MT-LBs developed in the 50's retrofitted with 25mm naval turrets developed in the 40's.


This has to be a joke.

Thank God that the US Department of the Navy never considered putting a 5"/54 caliber Mark 45 gun on top of an APC for the Marines.
 


Once said the listen to the old wise women, well not in Russia..


A good example of how powerful domestic propaganda can be. Here, what is ostensibly a facsist totalitarian state, have convinced an easily led demographic (aka older people) that fascists are coming for them. Successful gaslighting of the highest order.
 
When you get all your news from the same place and they keep on pumping the same garbage out, well it's to be expected.
It is from idiots. If they can’t work out that they have a dictator brainwashing them with propaganda though, despite others around them managing it, that’s on them. People also tend to believe what they want to believe, as shown with the media over here in recent years eg brexit.

It’s not just older people in Russia believing this either.
 
It is from idiots. If they can’t work out that they have a dictator brainwashing them with propaganda though, despite others around them managing it, that’s on them. People also tend to believe what they want to believe, as shown with the media over here in recent years eg brexit.

It’s not just older people in Russia believing this either.
And a further example would be Fox News in the US, the reality is some folks don't want to hear the truth
 
It is from idiots. If they can’t work out that they have a dictator brainwashing them with propaganda though, despite others around them managing it, that’s on them. People also tend to believe what they want to believe, as shown with the media over here in recent years eg brexit.

It’s not just older people in Russia believing this either.

I find that line of thinking problematic. You could have become the same if you grew up in that environment.

I mean, there's really only two ways about it. Either you think it is because of the propaganda they've been exposed to since probably decades or you think it is genetics - the latter I'd say is a racist concept.

We've just been lucky to be born in a different part of the world.
 
I find that line of thinking problematic. You could have become the same if you grew up in that environment.

I mean, there's really only two ways about it. Either you think it is because of the propaganda they've been exposed to since probably decades or you think it is genetics - the latter I'd say is a racist concept.

We've just been lucky to be born in a different part of the world.

I tend to agree, though. Its too easy to write people off as "idiots", but when people like Trump get elected to in the US, national decisions like Brexit go through... It doesn't matter where we're born. Quite simply, propaganda works, the global money spent on marketing and advertisements is enough proof of that. We're all products of our environments and the information we absorb.