Morty_
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2013
- Messages
- 4,091
- Supports
- Real Madrid
But there's no excuse for having an ill-equipped under resourced one
UK has a top navy, and i assume a top airforce, thats quite sufficient.
But there's no excuse for having an ill-equipped under resourced one
You could be right, the number does seen low though, maybe they have a quick change facility in something like IL76's where they can put essentially a giant tank in the hold and have a drogue type system - I might be wrong but didn't the US try something like that with C-130's?Only other ones I know of are some of their fighters that are able to perform buddy-buddy refuelings. I think it's the Mig-29 and some of the planes from the SU-27 family but i'm not certain. Those planes can of course carry very small amounts of fuel compared to a real tanker plane.
The UK has a Navy comprising of a total of about 60 ships, most of which are tiny patrol types!UK has a top navy, and i assume a top airforce, thats quite sufficient.
I don't know anything about that but there are many different versions of Hercules tankers, they are called KC-130 and are mainly used by the Marines.You could be right, the number does seen low though, maybe they have a quick change facility in something like IL76's where they can put essentially a giant tank in the hold and have a drogue type system - I might be wrong but didn't the US try something like that with C-130's?
The UK has a Navy comprising of a total of about 60 ships, most of which are tiny patrol types!
Or put another way, Britannia doesn't rule the waves!
The air force is better but has a fraction the number of aircraft it once had and some of those are actually leased!
The UK has a Navy comprising of a total of about 60 ships, most of which are tiny patrol types!
Or put another way, Britannia doesn't rule the waves!
The air force is better but has a fraction the number of aircraft it once had and some of those are actually leased!
And why would Britain need a bigger navy?
This. e
This.
Yes it has 4 RAF Typhoons based there + a Voyager anker and a transport A400Isn't there like an actual RAF base on the islands?
The navy is pretty good. The RAF is also under equipped.UK has a top navy, and i assume a top airforce, thats quite sufficient.
More on the previous post I wrote about Russian forces building trenches along the (western) coast of Crimea.
Some of those trenches would easily get flooded on the first high tide.
Once said the listen to the old wise women, well not in Russia..
When you get all your news from the same place and they keep on pumping the same garbage out, well it's to be expected.
There's really no way to say at the moment, with no independent sociological institutions left in the country and the war-time censorship with criminal consequences for saying stuff out of line being introduced. But from the subjective point of view it feels less and less possible that this constriction is going to fall down any time soon. My most realistic way of communicating with general public outside my own little bubble is a sports news website and at there are certainly way more aggressively pro-War, anti-Ukrainian comments there than there were, say, a year ago.I can't decide between believing the Russian population is brain washed beyond hope and thinking that the public opinion will eventually reach a tipping point once the sanctions and war efforts start to hurt them personally. Sometimes it seems there's a silent majority who is against the war and sometimes you think that's actually a minority.
I also wonder how to deal with that in a future in which Russia has (hopefully) lost the war. Here in Germany, I think the occupation and associated awareness and information work did much to counter the extreme propaganda and brainwashing of the nazi time but that will obviously not happen with a nuclear power. So there will always be propagandist and right wing extremist building on that basis.
MT-LBs developed in the 50's retrofitted with 25mm naval turrets developed in the 40's.
Once said the listen to the old wise women, well not in Russia..
MT-LBs developed in the 50's retrofitted with 25mm naval turrets developed in the 40's.
MT-LBs developed in the 50's retrofitted with 25mm naval turrets developed in the 40's.
MT-LBs developed in the 50's retrofitted with 25mm naval turrets developed in the 40's.
It is from idiots. If they can’t work out that they have a dictator brainwashing them with propaganda though, despite others around them managing it, that’s on them. People also tend to believe what they want to believe, as shown with the media over here in recent years eg brexit.When you get all your news from the same place and they keep on pumping the same garbage out, well it's to be expected.
And a further example would be Fox News in the US, the reality is some folks don't want to hear the truthIt is from idiots. If they can’t work out that they have a dictator brainwashing them with propaganda though, despite others around them managing it, that’s on them. People also tend to believe what they want to believe, as shown with the media over here in recent years eg brexit.
It’s not just older people in Russia believing this either.
It is from idiots. If they can’t work out that they have a dictator brainwashing them with propaganda though, despite others around them managing it, that’s on them. People also tend to believe what they want to believe, as shown with the media over here in recent years eg brexit.
It’s not just older people in Russia believing this either.
It's in Ukrainian but English subtitles are available.
I find that line of thinking problematic. You could have become the same if you grew up in that environment.
I mean, there's really only two ways about it. Either you think it is because of the propaganda they've been exposed to since probably decades or you think it is genetics - the latter I'd say is a racist concept.
We've just been lucky to be born in a different part of the world.