Ruben Amorim - Manchester United Head Coach | Thread locked during matches

And I'm asking you which change you think Amorim made at half time to help you answer that question yourself.

He made several changes at half time. No idea what the problem is to be honest. It was a genuine question but no worries carry on.
 
Our xG was also 1.38 to their 0.43.

Had we been the team to win 1-0 with exactly the same performance everyone would've said it was well deserved.

I'm seeing a good structure here that can work for us and be gradually upgraded by adding the right players to it over time. This Amotim fella is definitely showing why the leadership team wanted him in now rather than the summer. He needed this half season to put all the bricks in line ready for the summer window.
You've nailed how I feel.

I said in an earlier post that the cynic in me was almost expecting the recent optimism that I'd developed as a result of a string of good performances to dissipate today because Forest away has been such a tough game for teams all season but I was pleasantly surprised despite the result.

Put it this way, if we can sign a better striker this summer and maintain that level of performance consistently next season, I think we'll be much closer to where we want to be. I was pretty nervy about Amorim but the past run of seven odd matches has given me confidence that he's starting to steer the ship in the right direction.
 
Amorim looked more despondent than usual in the post match presser.

Hard to see how we can turn this around in the summer window alone.
 
Lot of poor decision today by Amorim from the starting XI to the whole game. It’s like he doesn’t know his players and doesn’t know where to play them.

The only decision he got it right was bringing Maguire as the super sub striker and I think it’s the first time he made this kind of change at United. Not an uncommon sub because ten Hag had done it before.

Not a lot wrong with any of his decisions imo. He had to play either Hojlund or Zirkzee (especially with Chido not in the lineup) and the likes of Mount weren't yet fully match fit.
 
He made several changes at half time. No idea what the problem is to be honest. It was a genuine question but no worries carry on.
He made one major structural change which was very obviously the point of the comment.
 
Could have been goals and legit chance are very different things. Literally any shot could have been a goal, it doesn't make it a good chance though.

A quick look on fotmob has Dalot's header being 0.06xG, and Bruno's early shot on target being the same. Those are half chances at best. I've given you Maguire's chances, but they only came about because the forward players didn't look like creating or scoring anything.

Now I agree with you that a better striker would see us creating more, and scoring more from lower quality chances, which would be a huge boon to us, but poor finishers isn't the only reason we aren't scoring - we looked toothless for most of the match tonight.

Except here, all of them could've easily been goals. When you hit the bar and have shots cleared off the line, those can objectively be called legit chances. Had both gone in, we'd be signing an entirely different tune. Happiness is a matter of inches.
 
They added a defender. Just admit you’re wrong. They took off a defender and a winger, and added two defenders. Everybody picked up on this except you, yet you want to tell me you don’t know what’s hard to understand?
TBF that poster thinks to get a good sense of a team's game long XG you need to break it down to shot level...eg divide 1.6 by 23 (the number of shots). That's what you're dealing with.
 
Amorim looked more despondent than usual in the post match presser.

Hard to see how we can turn this around in the summer window alone.

It's not hard to see at all. You add some genuine quality in at least two of the forward positions and sign at least one athletic ball carrying midfielder and this exact structure he's playing will start to win a lot more games.

We're defensively pretty damn good at the moment. We don't give up many chances, but we seem to suffer from teams taking a very high number of the few chances we allow them.
 
It's not hard to see at all. You add some genuine quality in at least two of the forward positions and sign at least one athletic ball carrying midfielder and this exact structure he's playing will start to win a lot more games.

We're defensively pretty damn good at the moment. We don't give up many chances, but we seem to suffer from teams taking a very high number of the few chances we allow them.
Think we need someone who can sit deep and pass the ball forward quickly way more than that tbh.
 
I don't think I had problem with any of our performances ever since Tottenham loss in February (including that one). Didn't watch Everton game though.

Today was a solid away performance at a team that's having a great season. Didn't concede chances other than that goal where Garnacho, Dorgu and Mazraoui had to catch him or block his shot somehow imo but clearly didn't. If we won it 1-0 or it finished 1-1, we'd all be saying it was a decent performance. Negative result doesn't change that for me.
 
I just really hope we sign some actual exciting players in the summer. I’m so tired of watching these players be so so mediocre, and coming away from Utd games grumpy at the bad decision making and lack of basic quality.
 
And it means we create more chances for our wingbacks than our attackers because the wingbacks are the overloads.

Its flawed, and unless the wingbacks are absolutely worldclass players in both attack and defence (they don't exist) than it's a system that will continue to fail in the premier league.

You just end up with jack of all trade players getting into good attacking positions but not being actually good enough to do anything about it, while you genuine attacking talents are marked out of the game.

Our attackers get plenty of chances and plenty of the ball. Garnacho just is a very wasteful player and Amad is injured at the moment. But you can’t say he didn’t get plenty of chances before he got injured.

We don’t need world class wingbacks, we just need someone on the right who has an actual final delivery unlike Dalot, and we just have to give our 20 year old newbie on the left a little time. As I said, he was brilliant the last game and even tonight almost had a game winning assist.
 
Not a lot wrong with any of his decisions imo. He had to play either Hojlund or Zirkzee (especially with Chido not in the lineup) and the likes of Mount weren't yet fully match fit.
I would rather we play Hojlund, pull Bruno to midfield and Zirkzee as the no 10 (He already said himself that he is false 9) than playing both Casemiro and Ugarte in midfield. Casemiro and Ugarte in double pivot means we’re less creative. I can understand if he does it vs team that will dominate possession but Forest’s set up was never to dominate possession.

He also put Mazraoui as LCB then switched him to RCB. He should know that Mazraoui would have been much more effective as RCB than as LCB because he done this multiple times in previous games started Mazraoui as LCB and realised he was less effective so switched him to RCB.

Switching Garnacho on the left and moved Zirkzee on the right means we don’t have player who has the pace to dribble past on the right, which means no balance because all the pace players move to the left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul
Team who played 120 minutes on Saturday Vs a team who barely has given all for 120 minutes all season. Pathetic effort really.
 
Performances are improving but you can only do so much when none of your player can score to save their lives.

A striker and a CM who fits the Amorim system alongwith wingback in the summer, and full pre season, lets hope it turns around next season

This season is a write off apart from Europe
 
Garnacho better on the right hand side for me.
He cuts inside from the left way too often and inevitably balloons his shot over the bar.
Also, Dorgu, can he ever beat a man? He never even tries.
 
Think we need someone who can sit deep and pass the ball forward quickly way more than that tbh.

That can be Bruno. He's fantastic at it. Some of his passing tonight was incredible (and yes I know he did give it away a few times too)
 
He made one major structural change which was very obviously the point of the comment.

Oh I got the point of your comment was about a change.

I was simply asking you which change he made as I didn't get to see most of the match. But you seem reluctant to elaborate so no worries.
 
That can be Bruno. He's fantastic at it. Some of his passing tonight was incredible (and yes I know he did give it away a few times too)
The problem is that is fine when teams sit back, but he's not good under pressure (which is part of why he gives it away) so it becomes a real issue when we're pressed.

We also lose him in attacking positions, which I know it's become vogue in the last few weeks to proclaim how he's now best in a double pivot, but I still don't think that's true. I think he's personally better as a 10, it's just better for the team right now because basically only Casemiro can pass the ball forward otherwise and he's terrible under pressure too. Right now we need a 2007 Scholes more than anything else. And we have since Carrick retired, apart from the odd brief period when Matic was fit and not totally finished.
 
Oh I got the point of your comment was about a change.

I was simply asking you which change he made as I didn't get to see most of the match. But you seem reluctant to elaborate so no worries.
That's rather important context you didn't include! :lol: It came across as arsey request because I assumed you'd watched the match.

At half time he brought Hojlund on for Ugarte, which allowed Bruno to play alongside Casemiro in midfield rather than as a 10. It was something a lot of people in the thread were calling for in the first half. How effective it was is questionable, but on the whole it was probably a necessary gamble.
 
I thought we played well actually. Just we don’t have a striker that can hit a cow’s arse with a banjo. Otherwise that result would match the performance for me.
 
People have short memories, we were constantly conceding chances last season, some games id lose count it was that bad, defensively we are miles better now, the midfield is also functioning better by protecting the defence, not perfect but better.

Our biggest issue is not taking advantage when we get it in good areas, players making the wrong decision in forward areas.
It was never going to be a quick fix but I can see improvement for sure , I’m confident he’ll get it right given time.
 
People have short memories, we were constantly conceding chances last season, some games id lose count it was that bad, defensively we are miles better now, the midfield is also functioning better by protecting the defence, not perfect but better.

Our biggest issue is not taking advantage when we get it in good areas, players making the wrong decision in forward areas.
It was never going to be a quick fix but I can see improvement for sure , I’m confident he’ll get it right given time.

This person gets it.
 
I thought we played well actually. Just we don’t have a striker that can hit a cow’s arse with a banjo. Otherwise that result would match the performance for me.

I also liked the way we were camped in their half in the final stages. Under Ten Hag we used to be losing in injury time and playing it back to Onana
 
That's rather important context you didn't include! :lol: It came across as arsey request because I assumed you'd watched the match.

At half time he brought Hojlund on for Ugarte, which allowed Bruno to play alongside Casemiro in midfield rather than as a 10. It was something a lot of people in the thread were calling for in the first half. How effective it was is questionable, but on the whole it was probably a necessary gamble.

:lol:

To be fair I should have said. No worries cheers.
 
I just really hope we sign some actual exciting players in the summer. I’m so tired of watching these players be so so mediocre, and coming away from Utd games grumpy at the bad decision making and lack of basic quality.

I think this is the piece that's really important. We have a team structure built for solidity, so with only 3 players who are supposed to primarily attack, its important that they have the intensity and creativity needed to drive an attack.

I see us as a team that is supposed to be a direct attacking team that can move the ball when needed, whilst having a solid structure. In a way, weirdly similar in thinking to what Liverpool currently are. With the added advantage of have narrow attacking players, who don't have to waste time cutting in, but can drive at the defence when they receive the ball in open central spaces. The atheticism across the Liverpool back 7 and the intense directness of Liverpool's attack are the type of player profiles we should be looking to get.

Defensively, I think Yoro is the blueprint. Able to recover, whilst also able to move the ball forward with dribbling when space is provided, taking advantage of the space the opposition gives the back 3.

I actually liked the performance, It showed that the system works in England and that the players are adapting to it. It also showed that some of our players, particularly in the front 3, don't have the quality to drive us forward. The truth is that despite how passive he is, alot of our attack success over the last 5 years has been the result of runs made by Rashford and supported by Bruno. We had a brief period where Greenwood joined the party and we were rolling. Now we are in a position with an attack( with Amad out and Mount just coming back) that is as bad as any 2016 or 2020
 
People have short memories, we were constantly conceding chances last season, some games id lose count it was that bad, defensively we are miles better now, the midfield is also functioning better by protecting the defence, not perfect but better.

Our biggest issue is not taking advantage when we get it in good areas, players making the wrong decision in forward areas.
It was never going to be a quick fix but I can see improvement for sure , I’m confident he’ll get it right given time.
We did have a huge amount of injuries but that approach by ten Hag... Think Carragher described United as a basriketball team under EtH. It was ridiculous really. Only bottom teams conceded more shots than we did and as you say amount of chances in general conceded... Felt incredible to me. It improved to extent this season but ultimately not enough and sack came in October.

Agree with rest of your post as well. I'm not as confident about Amorim getting it right as more than a decade of failure made me more reserved than optimistic when it comes to United, but do believe performances have been better lately.
 
Strange reading these comments as I came out of it feeling really positive about him. We lack a cutting edge but then we knew that already. We looked a lot better with the ball, much crisper passing, and we restricted them to very little.

Ignore the bollocks posted on here tonight, we played well and everybody, bar some of our own fans that just enjoy shitting on their own team even when it’s not deserved, could see it. Tonight’s performance actually gave me more belief that we could win the EL as we played football at a higher level tonight, and I think we’d control games against most of the teams left in the competition. Some nice one touch football, some great link up play to beat the press and some solid individual performances in the build up. We forced turnovers well, which we’ve been getting better at recently and we had a better shape to us which also led to some promising situations.

Once again we were let down by some individual performances though and we’re not good enough to carry players, especially whether Bruno was one player having an off day. It was good to see Mount back in contention and other players returning, hopefully we can create competition for places and even rest players as needed, which might take us up another level also.
 
Strange reading these comments as I came out of it feeling really positive about him. We lack a cutting edge but then we knew that already. We looked a lot better with the ball, much crisper passing, and we restricted them to very little.

That shows he has great coaching ability because he has the right idea and system and coaching skill to play us the right way. Decision making is different skill of set than coaching. For example, what about the decision to play Ugarte and Casemiro in double pivot against a team that doesn’t dominate possession. That’s not coaching. Is that the right decision? If not, can people criticise that decision?
 
Ignore the bollocks posted on here tonight, we played well and everybody, bar some of our own fans that just enjoy shitting on their own team even when it’s not deserved, could see it. Tonight’s performance actually gave me more belief that we could win the EL as we played football at a higher level tonight, and I think we’d control games against most of the teams left in the competition. Some nice one touch football, some great link up play to beat the press and some solid individual performances in the build up. We forced turnovers well, which we’ve been getting better at recently and we had a better shape to us which also led to some promising situations.

Once again we were let down by some individual performances though and we’re not good enough to carry players, especially whether Bruno was one player having an off day. It was good to see Mount back in contention and other players returning, hopefully we can create competition for places and even rest players as needed, which might take us up another level also.
Forest are a completely different side to Lyon and Bilbao. Don’t think tonight has any bearing or is pointed towards anything that’ll happen in Europa.
I can tell you now we won’t be controlling games against Lyon and Bilbao (if we get through) as they are a lot more possession based.

People getting carried away tonight a bit ….over a defeat. To a team who treat the ball like a hot potatoe and have a defensive line deeper than Gervinhos hairline and who played 120 mins Saturday evening.
 
This is absolutely correct. Elanga is thriving now in a lower pressure environment tailored to his skillset, but that doesn't necessarily mean we were wrong to sell him.

He's also hardly putting up numbers that we should be very envious about. 6 goals and doing decently in assists with 9. If it was double that I'd be starting to feel a bit more disappointed with him leaving but £15m wasn't a bad price for us at the time and it boosted our transfer coffers. Yes we're trash at the moment but keeping Elanga wasn't the answer. Reporters love to ask those kind of questions though because keeping their narrative comes before anything else.
 
But surely that’s a much better position to be in than to be fluking victories through individual brilliance.

Give him a window to get a few players in and then see how we get on.
Depends on how you look at it :lol:

I’d probably prefer being 3rd or whatever with some really good players compared to where we are now.

But yes our current position is much easier to build a solid foundation from. And quite frankly very easy to improve upon with new signings
 
Yeah, it's funny how people can't remember we had similar outcomes in our games when van Gaal was here, even if the style isn't the same, it's still 3 at the back and two wing backs that you simply cannot escape from. I am not saying it will be boring as it was under van Gaal, but most of teams that play with 3 defenders have lot of pointless possession that is simply too easy to have because you have lot of players behind the ball and no one up front. Even Pep's team were similar, altough with more quality up front obviously.

The absolutely massive difference is that LVG actually had some decent attacking players in his Utd squads.

Rooney, Van Persie, Welbeck, Chicarito, Falcao, Di Maria, Martial, Depay.

If we’d have had just one or two players like that today we probably would have scored a goal or two.