Nevilles.Wear.Prada
Full Member
He didn't just play 442 for decades, even you know that.SAF dominated the League, playing 4-4-2 for decades. Were teams just plain stupid at that time, couldn't find a way around to beat it.
He didn't just play 442 for decades, even you know that.SAF dominated the League, playing 4-4-2 for decades. Were teams just plain stupid at that time, couldn't find a way around to beat it.
No he didn't. The second great era (06-13) was a mix of 4-4-2, 4-3-3 and 4-5-1 as the need arose. Fergie was definitely tactically flexible. The hallmark of every great manager is tactical flexibiity.SAF dominated the League, playing 4-4-2 for decades. Were teams just plain stupid at that time, couldn't find a way around to beat it.
It’s always the same story with this team. We saw some improvements at first then the players are not trying anymore or don’t have the technical and physical attributs to perform the game plan.Iraola's initial results were comparably bad though, weren't they?
My worry is less the results themselves, but that I don't see any pattern of improvement in the way we are playing *and* the results are bad.
Every home game, when the onus is on us to attack, we leave ourselves wide open, that needs fixed, while looking pretty clueless in attackYeah fair point, but I was responding to the comment that we get dominated by every single team we play. That simply hasn't been the case.
It will be the same with any manager. The ETH era was a disaster. We bought expansive, overpaid, unsealable players and have no money left. The only transfer you can argue about is Martinez and even him is meh and too expansive for the player he is.I think he'll lose most of the dressing room by the end of the season, and even a summer to retool won't fix things. We don't have the money to rebuild a whole team and it seems like we need to buy more than half a starting squad to make it happen.
What also doesn't help him is that only 1 young player seems to fit his play style quickly. Garnacho isn't a 10 and he's not even being tried as a LWB. Mainoo is having ups and downs in this system, Yoro doesn't seem like he'll fit in perfectly as the RCB because we need someone who can handle playing wide and deal with faster players. And Hojlund/Zirkzee seem to be taking turns in who is having success with this system and who is utter dog shit every 2 weeks
To me if you're going to commit to Amad playing the RAM then let Dalot be the RWB and try Garnacho as the LWB at least they'd be closer to roles they understand and he'd still have his wish of having 1 attacking wb and and 1 defending. But he seems hesitant to try this even though the current setup isn't working either. If he's adamant in making his system work then he needs to be a bit more flexible in other aspects of the team
He won’t lose the dressing room because it’s already being torn up.I think he'll lose most of the dressing room by the end of the season, and even a summer to retool won't fix things. We don't have the money to rebuild a whole team and it seems like we need to buy more than half a starting squad to make it happen.
What also doesn't help him is that only 1 young player seems to fit his play style quickly. Garnacho isn't a 10 and he's not even being tried as a LWB. Mainoo is having ups and downs in this system, Yoro doesn't seem like he'll fit in perfectly as the RCB because we need someone who can handle playing wide and deal with faster players. And Hojlund/Zirkzee seem to be taking turns in who is having success with this system and who is utter dog shit every 2 weeks
To me if you're going to commit to Amad playing the RAM then let Dalot be the RWB and try Garnacho as the LWB at least they'd be closer to roles they understand and he'd still have his wish of having 1 attacking wb and and 1 defending. But he seems hesitant to try this even though the current setup isn't working either. If he's adamant in making his system work then he needs to be a bit more flexible in other aspects of the team
Of course he will. Sacking him before the end of the season would be a mockery, not to say entirely unfair when he didn’t want to come mid season anyway.He won't last that long. And don't forget, you assuming he will not lose the dressing room until then. Inability to hold on with some respectable performances at home will be his undoing.
Kind of confused by the mood / support of the Caf. Almost like many are turning on Amorim.
Results have been shit. I see some green shoots of progress, like more control of games, better possession numbers, a much more organized high press, etc.
I’d like to point out that many of the ETH defenders - to the very last day - were saying it was the players, not ETH.
The players are not good enough and never were. The entire first 11 with ETH were basically his players, save Bruno. The difference is that ETH had a full preseason, 600m in transfers and a transfer veto. Amorim is stuck with ETH’s players, no preseason, and a big fat zero in transfer spend.
The Caf loves to bash Ole, and call him the “PE teacher” and criticize his counterattacking football, but the fact remains, he was the best of the post SAF managers. No, he never won a trophy, but he got the best out of Rashford, Martial, Bruno, Mason, Maguire, Shaw, McFred, hell, Jesse fecking Lingard.
Sad that I look back on those days a bit wistfully. Given the state of the club and how dire our circumstances are, we should look back upon his time a bit more favorably…
You are totally wrong. Slot is able to convince a squad how to play, how to communicate, how to become fit. Amorim only complains that he inherited a terrible squad. That argument is not really convincing anyone to improve. Amorim is a one-trick pony.Exactly
And coming to EPL, managing a club of the size of United is a step up for almost any coach. So what
It was possibly even bigger step up for Arne Slot to join Liverpool from Feyenoord. In no way is Feyenoord bigger club than Sporting, neither is Netherlands stronger league than Portugal. And Slot seems to be fine. Why? Because he didn't inherit a shit squad, leftovers from 12 years of utter mismanagement. Amorim did
That is the difference. I am certain Amorim is not worse coach than Slot
Truth is that what Slot is doing at Liverpool isn’t radically different from what Klopp was doing at Liverpool. He isn’t trying to introduce a new system as Amorim is doing. You say he is a one trick pony but it’s what has brought him success before and was why he was hired over all others. We are still early days, and results will improve.Slot is able to convince a squad how to play, how to communicate, how to become fit.
Would much rather he said they were shite, which they are, than pretending they're playing well and being unlucky.Hope those "worst United team in history" comments don't backfire. He's been speaking well in press conferences but that was unnecessary.
I'd rather he gave proper context behind it and acknowledged his inflexible approach to the system is contributing to it. He has a good set of players in a lot of areas but they aren't suited to his system.Would much rather he said they were shite, which they are, than pretending they're playing well and being unlucky.
The whole thing is just so heartbreaking. He is a good manager, he came to us in our worst financial ebb. The fear factor is gone, even with money i don't see we can pull good players into his system.Of course he will. Sacking him before the end of the season would be a mockery, not to say entirely unfair when he didn’t want to come mid season anyway.
I don’t think he’s too concerned about losing the dressing room, these aren’t his players. Many if not most will be replaced anyway.
The heavy fixture congestion at this part of the season is not being kind to him, but results will improve and we’ll scrape by this season to live another day. Vivell and Wilcox better have a ruddy good plan for the summer, they’re gonna have to earn their keep!
Worst case scenario he signs a loan of Portuguese players and we become Sporting Club de England.The whole thing is just so heartbreaking. He is a good manager, he came to us in our worst financial ebb. The fear factor is gone, even with money i don't see we can pull good players into his system.
It won’t be easy to get the best players in. We don’t have the money, no Europe and results that talks for themself. And clubs nowadays have extremely competent scouts and data even on lower level.Worst case scenario he signs a loan of Portuguese players and we become Sporting Club de England.
Has a manger ever managed to turn things around after losing so many games, especially at home? I can't think of many.
I worry he is so deep in the mire now, it just seems improbable that he can change things, especially considering how young and inexperienced he is at the top level.
Yeah, it would definitely fit with the whole post-Fergie gypsy curse vibes if we finally stumble on a manager who actually has the chops to get us back on our perch, only to do this at a time when we don't have the money that any new manager would need to build a successful squad. Makes your heart bleed to think about the funds made available to much less impressive managers.The whole thing is just so heartbreaking. He is a good manager, he came to us in our worst financial ebb. The fear factor is gone, even with money i don't see we can pull good players into his system.
Yeah, it would definitely fit with the whole post-Fergie gypsy curse vibes if we finally stumble on a manager who actually has the chops to get us back on our perch, only to do this at a time when we don't have the money that any new manager would need to build a successful squad. Makes your heart bleed to think about the funds made available to much less impressive managers.
Is it that we don't have the money, or that we can't spend and comply with PSR?
If it's the latter then I say just break the rules and take the points deduction on the chin next season.
The heart of United was always 4-4-2 under SAF. A slight variance when Queiroz was here.No he didn't. The second great era (06-13) was a mix of 4-4-2, 4-3-3 and 4-5-1 as the need arose. Fergie was definitely tactically flexible. The hallmark of every great manager is tactical flexibiity.
I fear you may be right. I was genuinely excited by his appointment and was never as convinced by ETH and felt the wheels were already coming off by end of his first season, but his awful eye for a player was what killed him for me. But with Amorim as some of the more thoughtful journos have pointed out, the top coaches are not so inflexible, they can and do adapt. Its also a huge indictment of the INEOS team that unlike say Brighton, who have a clear style of play and hire managers and acquire players to fit that, we've gone for an extreme structure-focused manager without players to implement it. Ashworth must be chortling into his coffee at this point. Of course the real problem is the decade of Glazer neglect and their even more catastrophic hirings, but it seems INEOS are now merely continuing the cycle.Has a manger ever managed to turn things around after losing so many games, especially at home? I can't think of many.
I worry he is so deep in the mire now, it just seems improbable that he can change things, especially considering how young and inexperienced he is at the top level.
I think sometimes we obsess too much about a starting formation. The approach of Fergie definitely evolved from a more gung ho 442 with flying wingers to one more controlled and possession based as he looked to adapt in order to compete in Europe.The heart of United was always 4-4-2 under SAF. A slight variance when Queiroz was here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_UEFA_Champions_League_final
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Football_League_Cup_final
https://thebusbybabe.sbnation.com/2...ion-and-manchester-uniteds-recent-usage-of-it (4-2-3-1 is just Rooney dropping deeper.)
https://ristogjorgjiev.com/2023/06/...-behind-manchester-uniteds-2013-league-title/
With top players the result will improve. Sure. But the problem is that top players don’t want to come. It has been a graveyard for such players. Only over-the-hill oldies (like Casemiro, Eriksen) and young talented players (Hojlund, Zirkzee) may be convinced to come. And an other problem is that in the PL one-trick ponies are destroyed. You need to be tactically flexible in order to have success, if you don’t have the strongest squad financed by Abu Dhabi.Truth is that what Slot is doing at Liverpool isn’t radically different from what Klopp was doing at Liverpool. He isn’t trying to introduce a new system as Amorim is doing. You say he is a one trick pony but it’s what has brought him success before and was why he was hired over all others. We are still early days, and results will improve.
He was bought in for next season, not this season. He needs a transfer window and a pre-season under his belt.Probably not, but then again how many managers have come in mid-season and taken over a side who were about 10 places off where they should be in the table? We were an absolute shambles (and we still are). The bar is so low that a couple of wins strung together would be significant progress.
I'm starting to get Graham Potter at Chelsea vibes though. Amorim has to get us into the top half of the table. If we're still 13th (or worse) come May then I'd get rid.
Every home game, when the onus is on us to attack, we leave ourselves wide open, that needs fixed, while looking pretty clueless in attack
He was bought in for next season, not this season. He needs a transfer window and a pre-season under his belt.
Absolute lunacy to say that if we are 12th, he stays, but if we are 14th, he has to go.
Like this post. Squad is so thin and players we have are not very good = poor results.So we will bring in someone who will turn Rasmus and Zirkzee into 20 goal a season strikers, will get Rashford's head out of his arse. Will turn turn Onana into VDS, will turn Garnacho into prime Giggs. Bruno into prime Scholes. Mainoo into Roy Keane. Our CB's into Rio/Vidic, our fullbacks into Neville and Evra. Because no matter who comes in, whatever system, some of these players are crap. This system has actually worked at times. The big problem is our players cannot cope with playing a lot of games, well let me tell them something that is what a Manchester United player does. The biggest issue we have is a squad with not enough quality to be able to rotate. Certain players get played to death. Trouble is Ineos are going down the potential market, which is fine if it is top potential, however you also need to be bringing in experience as well. Bringing in potential at the strikers position and nobody else with experience was negligence of the highest order.
There is a lot of talent in this squad. But sadly talent isn’t worth more then physicality and system in Premier League. We loose against team that bully us and run pass us.
We are small and weak and often weak minded.
On paper, not a team on bottom half has ”better” players then us. But they often are stronger, more drilled and play with more power.
Our back three that gets a lot of criticism is actually players that all of the bottom half teams would welcome with open arms. But they getting exposed game in and game out by our midfield. Been like this for ages.
You know he said "we are ..." that includes him and the staff.I'd rather he gave proper context behind it and acknowledged his inflexible approach to the system is contributing to it. He has a good set of players in a lot of areas but they aren't suited to his system.
Can't argue with that.I think sometimes we obsess too much about a starting formation. The approach of Fergie definitely evolved from a more gung ho 442 with flying wingers to one more controlled and possession based as he looked to adapt in order to compete in Europe.
Thats fine but the team themselves were not as bad as they are now on general results.You know he said "we are ..." that includes him and the staff.
For you just that reminder about inflexibility, ETH argumenting with a journalist after Liverpool 3-0.
Heh
Thats fine but the team themselves were not as bad as they are now on general results.