Berbasbullet
Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 22,337
literally nothing clear about that.It was very poor and he was clearly given a bollicking from higher up.
literally nothing clear about that.It was very poor and he was clearly given a bollicking from higher up.
A poster claimed that it is unfair to have expectations from our young players like Mainoo, Garnacho, Hojlund, Yoro and I replied saying, if you want to play for Manchester United week in week out, regardless of age, you have to deal with the pressure and expectations.
My point then was if they dont want those pressures, United isnt the right club for them.
Thought the same.It was very poor and he was clearly given a bollicking from higher up.
1. Pablo Barrios (At. Madrid). This kid (yes he's only 21) is an absolute monster. He'll cost 50m+ but he'll be money well spent. If you do both the eye test and the stat/data test, you can see how superb he really is. Excelling in both the defensive and progressive elements of the game. He would be an addition that could be at the heart of our midfield for the best part of a decade, and is already good enough to deliver now. He'd be my top target.
4. Douglas Luiz. Out of favour at Juve but Premier League proven and a very solid, high quality, deep lying midfield playmaker, who excels in the defensive phase of the game. Doesn't quite have the legs of the other three, but he makes up for that in his positioning and reading of the game. He's also no slouch, and knows how to put in a hard tackle. He's good with the ball, and I think could be gotten for a very good price. He's still only 26, and would improve us immediately.
5. Matheus Nunes. Yes I took this one straight from The Athletic. But it makes a lot of sense. If we can navigate around the whole "he plays for City" thing (they've sold to rivals recently), he could be a sleeper hit for us. He was phenomenal for Sporting under Amorim, in a midfield two, alongside.....you guessed it......Manuel Ugarte. He was so good in that role in fact, Pep called him maybe the best midfielder in the world. Things have gone sour for him at City because they don't know where and how to play him, but as midfield two, he has so many qualities, not least ball carrying. And before anyone says we'd be too open, that defies actual demonstrated history where his defensive stats at Sporting, alongside Ugarte in the 4-3-2-1 were excellent. The main issue is bringing in a player who is obviously low on confidence, to a club that is bereft of belief. But there is an opportunity there.
Bollocking for what exactly?It was very poor and he was clearly given a bollicking from higher up.
If that was the case, then we will stay in this mess for a long time.It was very poor and he was clearly given a bollicking from higher up.
People keep saying this but it's absolute nonsense. Even if we weren't skint, we'd start next season with 75% of this season's players.If that was the case, then we will stay in this mess for a long time.
This team need a shock and they got it, if they cant take it..well they can move on.
That’s not what I said.A poster claimed that it is unfair to have expectations from our young players like Mainoo, Garnacho, Hojlund, Yoro and I replied saying, if you want to play for Manchester United week in week out, regardless of age, you have to deal with the pressure and expectations.
My point then was if they dont want those pressures, United isnt the right club for them.
Not the only one you took straight from there. They also suggested Douglas Luiz and Pablo Barrios.
You can't seriously tell me we hired him without this being discussedI am not sure if Amorim has the experience to adapt a play style to the players.
I am pretty sure he was not appointed to do that.
Would it surprise you? They may have known about three at the back, but also his dogmatism?You can't seriously tell me we hired him without this being discussed
It's hilarious how people constantly underestimate how difficult it is to do a squad overhaul unless you pull off the Chelsea or Man City model with loads of cash available. We don't have that.People keep saying this but it's absolute nonsense. Even if we weren't skint, we'd start next season with 75% of this season's players.
Luiz and Nunes would be superb signings.
Care to elaborate?I don't agree.
Care to elaborate?
While I agree this inflexibility is weird, it's not that uncommon that a manager would play 4-2-3-1 wherever he goesFair enough he's had succes with 3421.
But does that mean he will never play another formation in his career? Quite extreme.
Fair enough he's had succes with 3421.
But does that mean he will never play another formation in his career? Quite extreme.
Which is a statistically far more proven and succesful formation, more acquainted with most (top) footballers and probably for a reason.While I agree this inflexibility is weird, it's not that uncommon that a manager would play 4-2-3-1 wherever he goes
Yeah also fair point!Which is a statistically far more proven and succesful formation, more acquainted with most (top) footballers and probably for a reason.
But I guess you make a point.
Bollocking for what exactly?
I'm am pretty sure he would have said he's doing things his way, his system.You can't seriously tell me we hired him without this being discussed
I’m sure Fergie said those exact same words to Giggs, Scholes, Becks, Ron and Rooney behind closed doors. All the while watching over them like a KGB agent and keeping them away from media and away from night clubs to protect them from their weak mentalities.Exactly. The class of 92 managed, as did Rooney, Ronaldo and many more. You either develop the elite mentality needed through hardwork or you feck off elsewhere.
I don't think he backtracked. He never meant it like that. I thought I was slow reading everyone take it a certain way because it was always clear he was very clearly talking about the collective vis a vis his managerial performance. He started and finished with his record and his insistence on his formation. 'We are the worst, me included'.You can probably tell I fully support Amorim from my username, but I think there was no need to come out and justify or clarify anything to the press. Just double down and say "how can anyone possibly disagree that this is the worst Man United teams of recent years - look the table, goals scored, goal difference etc. - it is up to the players to prove me wrong."
This is generally an issue with a lot of honest people. They assume that other people are honest too. Those are vultures in the media room, Amorim, and they are waiting to put the knife in.
Well, maybe so. Still, it’s important to remember that when you talk at a press conference, you are talking to several different people at once. You are talking to the tabloid vultures just looking for an angle to bite. At the same time you’re talking to a few senior journalist whom you know might write something to buy you a few weeks extra time if you help them see what’s really going on. Simultaneously you are talking to thousands of fans who might back you in the stadium at 0-1 down to Sot’on or slaughter you on SoMe while your insecure and narcissist players gulp it down. And you’re also talking to your insecure and narcissistic players and to the people who will meet them at the butchers, in the street, or in their home, either pestering them with despondent looks and questions or bigging them up like they just scored a hat trick vs Brighton really, or at lest would have if the gaffer only didn’t cramp your style.You can probably tell I fully support Amorim from my username, but I think there was no need to come out and justify or clarify anything to the press. Just double down and say "how can anyone possibly disagree that this is the worst Man United teams of recent years - look the table, goals scored, goal difference etc. - it is up to the players to prove me wrong."
This is generally an issue with a lot of honest people. They assume that other people are honest too. Those are vultures in the media room, Amorim, and they are waiting to put the knife in.
Swap Van der Sar for Schmeichel and Ruud for Van Persie and you'd have an even better team.Here is an ideal lineup for the 'famous' Amorim 3 4 2 1 formation that can be used as a model or reference.
you can judge on how much the drop in quality is with the current squad.
schmeichael
stam ferdinand vidic
valencia roy keane carrick ashley young
scholes rooney
van pierse
Not sure if he got heat from higher ups, but when journalists pressured him, he started apologizing and saying "I am young manager and I make mistakes"It was very poor and he was clearly given a bollicking from higher up.
I'm at the point where I think it was a mistake to hire Amorim. He is so wedded to a particular system, and our current squad is so unsuited to it, that we're going to have to take several steps back before we begin to move forward. Everyone wants to see the dead wood moved on from the squad, but Amorim is thinking of selling the few bright sparks, like Garnacho. I've no doubt Amorim is a good manager, but it will take such massive surgery to the squad to make his system work that we should have chosen someone else. It's an indictment of Wilcox and the directors that they didn't foresee this.
A team of Onana; Mazraoui, Yoro, De Ligt, Dalot; Ugarte, Mainoo; Mount, Bruno, Garnacho; Hojlund is good enough for top 4, in my opinion, with the right manager. We should have found that manager and built on the squad we have instead of appointing an ideologue who can only do things one way and needs to rip everything up. The frustration is we're not even at square one yet. We need to take several steps back towards square one before starting to move forward again.
By the time we have a squad that can play Amorim's system, what's to say that system will still work? Football is evolving all the time. I can't think of a truly great manager who was inflexible about systems. We've appointed an interesting manager who's a bad fit for the club.
I can only see two likely scenarios: he takes three years or so to build the squad he wants, but eventually delivers success; or he spends a couple of years chopping and changing the squad, but never has a team he's really happy with, and he leaves without having had any success, and leaves us with a worse squad than he inherited. The second scenario is more likely, it seems to me.