UnsungHero
Full Member
Will Sir Jim make him pay for the broken dressing room TV out of his wages?
Obviously!
Will Sir Jim make him pay for the broken dressing room TV out of his wages?
Probably too soon to sack Amorim.Tears... if that's true. Sack anyone that cried.
Well I would cry too, after yelling at them and then suddenly you see players like Antony, Onana, Dalot etc looking back at you.Apparently Amorim got so angry he cried, not joking.
So then is it your position that you disagree with Amorim's own position as per below?I am defending Amorim on the aspects that matter - believing his system is going to be successful with the right players (as I used to with ten hag to be fair), and on his approach to management.
But he is failing to show pragmatism during transitional periods for the squad, almost running before they can walk. This is a mistake ten hag made too.
The money spent and signings I'm not getting into, I've always thought we wasted money under every coach and it's not manager specific but more structural. My hope is that is fixed for Amorim to be successful.
It could be anyone, including Rashford whether he was there at the time or not. You'd have to be incredibly naive to think members of the squad who didn't travel wouldn't have found out about it - players talk to each other you know...Another dressing room leak on this... I wonder who... was Rashford traveling in the squad and would he be in the dressing room? If not him then it's someone else
We have some good players but aren't very good from a physical point of view, too many slower, or weaker players (compared to other PL players).I'd rather he gave proper context behind it and acknowledged his inflexible approach to the system is contributing to it. He has a good set of players in a lot of areas but they aren't suited to his system.
So then is it your position that you disagree with Amorim's own position as per below?
Surely this is better logic. Why waste an entire year training players in a system that he is unfamiliar with, only to start from scratch next year?
Surely beginning 2025/26 season it is better to have six months of his new system under their belt, than none, and then hit the ground running? You must agree that a running start is superior to a stop start.
Even if he doesn't have all the right players now, don't you think it expedient that Amad, Mainoo, Yoro, Bruno, et al, all benefit from getting familiar with the system right this moment?
Fancy thatSo maybe @Berbaclass’s tweet from UtdMenace has some truth to it afterall
There's definitely truth to it, if Laurie is reporting it it's true, but unlikely to be the dramatic recollection from that first tweet.So maybe @Berbaclass’s tweet from UtdMenace has some truth to it afterall
YepLove that from Amorim. These players needed a massive bollocking. Useless bunch.
Ruben has had enough
So then is it your position that you disagree with Amorim's own position as per below?
Surely this is better logic. Why waste an entire year training players in a system that he is unfamiliar with, only to start from scratch next year?
Surely beginning 2025/26 season it is better to have six months of his new system under their belt, than none, and then hit the ground running? You must agree that a running start is superior to a stop start.
Even if he doesn't have all the right players now, don't you think it expedient that Amad, Mainoo, Yoro, Bruno, et al, all benefit from getting familiar with the system right this moment?
Thats the issue. Team was going down in league finishes. Going down in performances. Going down in quality of players. After 10 years of mismanagement and with new owners, the only way forward was change (more or less dramatic). If you change so much in coach profile, that tell you that ownership is probably going to change as well in recruitment and player profile. Is it expectable to do this and keep competing for titles?I have been reading through all the drama - well most of the posts are so bad it's not even funny anymore. It's been said since day one that Amorim came with his tactics and it probably won't work from day 1 but the work starts to implement it through the team - also said from day one how we probably have to play with pure defenders on the wings, because on most cases it's safer to teach a defender the role we need on the wings rather than teach a winger, who hasn't played similar role before.
And then people saying how we should sack him, well go back to football manager or FIFA or whatever the kids play these days. Pep's first year was as tough at points with multiple defeats that made them look like mugs and they were proven "champions" team before he took over.
Klopp got plenty of beatings as well. And they had just had a championship run before him also.
And now us, a team which scraped a 8th place last season and was widely off the pace most of the games, you expect us to be better?
So then is it your position that you disagree with Amorim's own position as per below?
Surely this is better logic. Why waste an entire year training players in a system that he is unfamiliar with, only to start from scratch next year?
Surely beginning 2025/26 season it is better to have six months of his new system under their belt, than none, and then hit the ground running? You must agree that a running start is superior to a stop start.
Even if he doesn't have all the right players now, don't you think it expedient that Amad, Mainoo, Yoro, Bruno, et al, all benefit from getting familiar with the system right this moment?
I think it's more that there aren't just two extremes of his style versus something else. Surely he can (and does) tweak his ideas depending on the opponent. He could keep the back 3 but play two up top with only Bruno behind, or push the tens wider to be wingers even if just a stop gap, he could risk 1 DM to get someone a bit higher up. I am just spitballing but there's a myriad of options in between his system and abandoning it completely.
Who?Awaiting the inevitable Helen Lovejoys in here. God forbid the players get any sort of (long overdue) bollocking
OK, but why would he push the tens wider when he's trying to teach the existing wide players to learn how to play inside? It's a teaching point. The lesson is more important than the short term outcome because the long term is the important thing. That's his point of contention with Garnacho. That when Garnacho plays he doesn't try to play the role assigned to him and that this means Dalot ends up filling the no 10 position instead, but then that causes havoc because Dalot will be out of position on defensive transition.
That and two tens holding wide would directly interfere with the wingbacks natural width.
Why then doesn’t he switch to talented youth players? Why is he sticking to Harry, Antony etc?Thats the issue. Team was going down in league finishes. Going down in performances. Going down in quality of players. After 10 years of mismanagement and with new owners, the only way forward was change (more or less dramatic). If you change so much in coach profile, that tell you that ownership is probably going to change as well in recruitment and player profile. Is it expectable to do this and keep competing for titles?
If you think of the system broadly, surely there are parts he believes are paramount right now versus things he could dedicate more time to in summer? Even the most fanatical coaches have things they change when they deem it necessary.OK, but why would he push the tens wider when he's trying to teach the existing wide players to learn how to play inside? It's a teaching point. The lesson is more important than the short term outcome because the long term is the important thing. That's his point of contention with Garnacho. That when Garnacho plays he doesn't try to play the role assigned to him and that this means Dalot ends up filling the no 10 position instead, but then that causes havoc because Dalot will be out of position on defensive transition.
That and two tens holding wide would directly interfere with the wingbacks natural width.
Will Sir Jim make him pay for the broken dressing room TV out of his wages?