Ruben Amorim - Manchester United Head Coach

I am sick to the back teeth of people excusing Amorim of all responsibility. The quality of the players is a factor that is proportional to success but I would expect to see one or two players flourishing under his inspiration, all players running a whole lot more and to see a general uplift in performance. I don't think the guy is pragmatic enough, I don't think his language is positive enough and I don't think he has the ideas we need. Feels very underwhelming. He's got to get something going. Go Fergie 4-5-1. Defend deep and hit teams on counter or play long balls down the flanks and have and have Hojlund run onto them and young bucks getting up in support. Just something. This wingback shit may work out long term but it could get us relegated before the tale is ever told.

Onana

Maguire. De Ligt Yoro. Dalot.

Dialo. Mainoo. Ugarte. Bruno Garnacho

Hojlund

Ffs get Rashy going. You just know a top manager in the ilk of Fergie, Ancelotti, Klopp or Pep would take him aside and stir his oils. Get him running and fighting and giving his best. Though I do suspect he is so far up his own arse, that this is not an easy job.
Whatever happened to the Newbie promotion system? If ever there were ever a compelling argument for its return, it's this post.
 
We have had an insanely tough run of fixtures, with most in-form teams - Arsenal, Bournemouth, Newcastle & Wolves within them. Now also Liverpool coming.

I am sick to the back teeth of people excusing Amorim of all responsibility. The quality of the players is a factor that is proportional to success but I would expect to see one or two players flourishing under his inspiration, all players running a whole lot more and to see a general uplift in performance. I don't think the guy is pragmatic enough, I don't think his language is positive enough and I don't think he has the ideas we need. Feels very underwhelming. He's got to get something going. Go Fergie 4-5-1. Defend deep and hit teams on counter or play long balls down the flanks and have and have Hojlund run onto them and young bucks getting up in support. Just something. This wingback shit may work out long term but it could get us relegated before the tale is ever told.

Onana

Maguire. De Ligt Yoro. Dalot.

Dialo. Mainoo. Ugarte. Bruno Garnacho

Hojlund

Ffs get Rashy going. You just know a top manager in the ilk of Fergie, Ancelotti, Klopp or Pep would take him aside and stir his oils. Get him running and fighting and giving his best. Though I do suspect he is so far up his own arse, that this is not an easy job.

To be fair Fergie either would have sorted the Rashford situation one way or the other years ago. Either got him playing well or shipped him out.

However, It's not as simple as all that. I think if we had a stable coaching team throughout the time Rashford was here the same would have happened. Every time a new manager comes in it's a clean slate and they all think they can get the best out of the player and also may not have been informed of the exact nature of the issues under the previous guy.
 
One week of training, that should fix it.

Jesus Christ.
Is it one week of training though? Pretty sure he’s been training the team since November. The difference is he’s not had a full week like he keeps complaining. Who said anything about fixing?
 
Ten Hags stock has only risen since he was sacked. He was not the problem to address.

Changing the manager hasn't made it any less necessary for Rashford and Shaw to be replaced as first team starting players.
 
Fulham are lining up in a 3-4-3 today, and although people love to exaggerate how bad our squad is, there isn’t a single player that would start over any of our own, bar Robinson, and they are possibly 10 points ahead of us after today.

It can’t be as hard to implement as what we are seeing. The only explanation is players attitudes and commitment, and that is what he needs to weed out.
 
Have we? I imagine we might have had two days of training this week.
You would hope we cut any recovery or gym sessions short and focus on main thing and that's getting the squad of players up to scratch with what's going to happen on pitch with new idea/identity.

Need to start getting postive results from now. Everyone thinking we are going to beat teams with ease with set of fixtures after today's game is questionable. Way we are playing still think we will struggle games vs Southampton and Brighton to come.
 
You don't get my point, you don't hire a system manager and expect them.to change it. Or let them, like ETH did, I wasn't trying to compare Ruben to Pep.

My point was these players would have flopped in his system/style of play. When you get a manager for a particular way of playing, you can't expect him change his system to suit the players after 1 month, Ruben has proven his system abroad.

Albeit a lesser league, but what he did I Portugal was akin to Fergie at Aberdeen. And before leaving he was up there just under Liverpool in the CL table. His system work just requires patience. I know it doesn't help when our attack is weak, especially after our best striker has downed tools at the critical stage.
We aren’t talking about the same things.

On the one hand, you’re saying that you don’t hire Amorim and expect him to not play his football. Of course I agree with that and have said as much, and am broadly supportive of that.

On the other hand, you bring examples of Guardiola and now Fergie.

On Guardiola, you specifically said we wouldn’t expect to hire him and ask him to change his system. Of course that’s true. But it’s also a bad example. Guardiola has a proven system at the absolute highest levels. Amorim doesn’t, no matter how you try and frame it.

I’m all for giving him time and know these players are shite and either can’t deliver it or will take a hell of a lot of time to adjust to be able to deliver it. But we can’t pretend that there isn’t a risk here. And that’s why it’s different to Guardiola. And why you can’t use Guardiola as an example. The risk of giving Amorim time and in the end finding out his system just doesn’t work in the PL or at the highest level is much, much higher than trying to do the same with Guardiola, where you can almost say with certainty that give him time and money and he will bring relentless success and trophies.

And because of that greater risk, giving Amorim time doesn’t mean we should just accept whatever happens and ignore or not try and look for signs that things aren’t all rosey. As I said, I am very supportive of giving him time and not expecting him to change his system. But can’t understand people who don’t see the risk there, or think he should be afforded as much time as a Guardiola would be.
 
Is it one week of training though? Pretty sure he’s been training the team since November. The difference is he’s not had a full week like he keeps complaining. Who said anything about fixing?
'No excuses' to me says you are expecting a massive change.

He's trying to change a whole system on the fly - he needs a full pre season not a week here and there to make any big improvements.
 
It's not true that united has no leaders.

Onana is more vocal than De Gea.
De Ligt and Maguire also were Captain before as was Shaw.

Mainoo and Ugarte are up and coming. Casemiro and Eriksen were big leaders for their club and country.

Bruno is the captain for club. Rashford also captained side before. And players like Hojlund is larger than life in their own country.

And we all saw what happened when he dared have a go at Maguire for something.

Just because some of these guys wore armbands it doesn't make them leaders on the pitch. Maguire had and he couldn't handle it. Casemiro and Eriksen are finished, they might be leaders off the pitch but on it, they are not capable of leading anything now. Shaw & Rashford are not captains or leaders.

Bruno wears it and he's probably the worst type of player you can have as captain.
 
I don’t know how they schedule it to be fair. Is it usually a day of after a game? Or recovery sessions the day after a game?
Tuesday was probably a day off. Wednesday and Thursday we'd have done most of our on pitch training. Potentially Friday we focused more on the opposition. Yesterday, I imagine was recovery. Not sure if we will have stayed in Liverpool overnight or travelled up this morning.
 
Ten Hags stock has only risen since he was sacked. He was not the problem to address.

Changing the manager hasn't made it any less necessary for Rashford and Shaw to be replaced as first team starting players.
Ten hag was one of the biggest problems. Absolutely clueless in how he wanted his teams to play, clueless with recruitment, zero motivational skills and ability to adapt mid game.

Lets not pretend that he was the answer.
 
Ten Hags stock has only risen since he was sacked. He was not the problem to address.

Changing the manager hasn't made it any less necessary for Rashford and Shaw to be replaced as first team starting players.
It most definitely hasn't.
 
Ten Hags stock has only risen since he was sacked. He was not the problem to address.

Changing the manager hasn't made it any less necessary for Rashford and Shaw to be replaced as first team starting players.
It really hasn't
 
Is it one week of training though? Pretty sure he’s been training the team since November. The difference is he’s not had a full week like he keeps complaining. Who said anything about fixing?
I asked a question in the same thread (about Amorim having only 4 training sessions up until now). Look it up and see the responses. We have had games every 3 days which leaves the coach no time to get a regular approach training session. Something that squads go through during preseason.
 
Is it one week of training though? Pretty sure he’s been training the team since November. The difference is he’s not had a full week like he keeps complaining. Who said anything about fixing?
We had a conversation about that a couple about 80 (sigh) pages ago actually:
I always wonder about this. What is it with pre-season that a regular season time can't achieve, in terms of improving players and getting them to get comfortable with the tactic? Aren't actual games a much better barometer than friendly games to see how players improve?
It's the training sessions schedule that are different. It affects two things the ability to spend a lot of time on tactical details and each players getting used to their roles but also the roles of the teammates they interact the most with and then there is the coaching staff itself that needs to be familiar with the players, their tendencies and how they may understand or fail to understand certain things. Then the most important thing especially when you move to systems that have totally different roles requiring different sets of efforts, is the conditioning, our players conditioning was in theory tailored for ETH's main tactics and the roles he set, if you drastically change the set up and roles you have to reset the conditioning which is nearly impossible to do smoothly within the season.
All those can be implemented during regular season. When approaching actual games, they're talking about tactics. They're practicing tactics. They're implementing tactics. Players can get familiar in actual games, and in trainings they must also have. In terms to get familiar with players, what is so special about pre-season that interacting in regular season can't do?

Conditioning part is hard for me to comment, as I don't know much. But does it mean players need to have a certain period of only non-competitive games for this "conditioning" to be successful? As pre-season also involving games. Also we've been rotating heavily that sometimes to detriment of the team.
A lot of what happens on the pitch is pre-planned: triggers for runs or when the press happens, patterns of movement and passing, and so on and so forth. Players don't actually make a ton of creative decisions on those on the fly all the time; most of what happens are variants of patterns practiced in training until they became automatic - at which point the in-game creativity is more about being able to recognize what pattern fits a situation and improvising around it as required.

If that sounds like coaches are drilling things into players through a lot of repetition, then you got it exactly right. And that's exactly what you can't do during the season if you have midweek games. Teams generally have only one on-field training session per day during the regular season (sometimes two during pre-season, but not even always), and the day after the game is for recovery. I think the game before the day is match-specific prep (learning to anticipate things that are specific to the upcoming opponent, and specific routines that will work will against them), plus there are rest days - meaning that you often have only one day between matches to work on the routines.

That's really very little and means that drilling in routines during the season is very slow at top clubs. (It's better at lower levels, since they don't have European football and will often be eliminated from domestic cups earlier.) That's why pre-season is so massively important for a new coach. As it happens, I actually saw a reference on the forum today to a BBC article that discusses this:

Link: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cgm9evp4177o

For my purposes, the beginning is really the key part, when Amorim mentions (well, implies) that he has had only four sessions where they could really work on drilling in his system.

(To get back to my point from a few posts ago, the subsequent bit is also interesting, cause you can see that Amorim himself also thinks a summer transition would have been preferable; but it was apparently now or never for United, so he decided to go with it. Which in turn means that United management and Amorim are both very aware of the limitations of his current situation and how difficult that makes the transition to Amorim's style - and will likely back him through that even if results continue to be poor, as long as relegation isn't a real risk.)

But to go back to the topic of this post: so this shortness of training moments is a real thing. It's not a whiny coach looking for excuses, it's really the difficult reality of bringing significant change to a club mid-season.
It's extremely hard to believe he only has 4 training sessions since he was hired.

But he has another 5 months to improve the squad. I don't think there should be excuse that the players won't understand the tactic, or no improvement on some players.
As I said, I suppose he means sessions where they are not recovering from the past match or prepping for the next, but have time to work on overall patterns of play. Four also seems few to me, but I don't know the details of the schedule and training rhythm, and it anyway couldn't have been more than 10 or so: he's only been at United six or seven weeks, and with a mid-week game every(?) week, there are just very few days left when you're not doing match-related training work.

Someone else can do a proper count, but Amorim anyway might not have meant 'four' literally; it could be just an approximation he used to indicate that it's not been much. And that's true regardless of whether it's been four or six or eight such sessions.
They can be implemented during the season but it will be very slow because scheduling means that there isn't actually many full training sessions, most of the sessions are focused on passive recovery and installing gameplans that are within a tactical framework that was set during summer. And no in normal circumstances they are not really practicing new tactics or implementing new tactics during the season, a manager can decide to still do it but it will lead to significant inconsistency which is what we are seeing and what Liverpool or even Arsenal saw under Klopp and Arteta.

To give you a clear example, during preseason you have several hours per day that you can allocate to tactical drills with the entire squad during the season you maybe have 90 minutes per week or every two weeks and it is almost guaranteed that it won't be with the full squad. And those in season sessions do not include much actual field implementations unless you want to destroy your players conditioning.

There are two aspects of conditioning that makes it nearly impossible to switch quickly, the first one is the season planning, players are trained to physically peak at a certain period during the season and this process starts during preseason, the other thing is that the quicker you want the change to happen the more intense the training has to be which is a big source of fatigue, in the short term it leads to worse performances and injuries especially when you have to play competitive games twice a week.

Basically there is no shortcut on these things, you need time for both of these things and time isn't something that you have during the season, unless you really don't care about results.
So yes, a full week of non-match-related training should help, but Amorim will still be in the early phases of drilling his approach into the squad.
 
Ten hag was one of the biggest problems. Absolutely clueless in how he wanted his teams to play, clueless with recruitment, zero motivational skills and ability to adapt mid game.

Lets not pretend that he was the answer.
And you're saying Amorim is?
 
It most definitely hasn't.
INEOS would love that to be true aswell.

What's happened since is proof that Ten Hag wasn't the biggest fish to fry this season. Recruitment still needed to replace a lot of attackers and goals that this team lost in losing Greenwood, Ronaldo and Cavani in recent seasons.
 
Roy is spot on about a world class striker getting you out of jail. Man city with Haaland, Pool with Salah, the team can be playing average but they can get a goal from a half chance and swing the result.
Need to create chances in the first place though
 
Whatever happened to the Newbie promotion system? If ever there were ever a compelling argument for its return, it's this post.
People have opinions that differ from yours, get used to it. This is not your dictatorship republic.
 
I'm not really seeing it. I missed the Bournemouth game, but I feel like we really struggle generally to create enough.
Oh nowhere near enough, but that 's the point about a world class striker bailing you out. That implies there are issues.
 
And you're saying Amorim is?
I am saying what i posted.

I also prefer not to make a judgement on the new coach when he’s had 0 transfer windows and pre-seasons and was thrown into the deep end with fixtures piling up and braindead players.
 
I'm not really seeing it. I missed the Bournemouth game, but I feel like we really struggle generally to create enough.

Movement by the strikers is terrible though. Better movement would create better chances. They are also terrible on the ball for some reason. So much of our build up dies when our front men get involved.
 
I’m all for giving Amorim time and haven’t really set any goals this season outside of don’t get relegated , so nobody can accuse me of being harsh on him.

But this is not a squad that should be languishing in lower half of table. No amount of waffly “it’s all the squad” can disguise the fact that this squad finished 8th last season with an injury crisis that Amorim isn’t having to manage. I also think the squad isn’t weaker, with ugarte and Yoro defo good starting quality players.

I accept confidence is rock bottom but I don’t accept that lower then top half of league is “as good as could be expected”. That’s nonsense that’s been spouted to imply that the manager couldn’t do much better, well he could and if his “I’m doing it this way regardless of players” continues to struggle picking up points he won’t be around long enough to make it work.

Some fans have this weird managerial fetish that can be all or nothing , the manager is the messiah or pariah. I believe Amorim could have the quality to do great things but I fear he may not get the time to achieve it if the team doesn’t respond soon to whatever it is he wants. Managers have to adapt . Quality managers make alterations, sometimes game by game , if they feel it increases their teams chances of winning.

I always felt that losing in champions league final to Madrid was a powerful lesson for Klopp, particularly in the final win against spurs a season later. He learned how to win ugly and pragmatically. This was something Ferguson regularly did and only cheat code unlimited quality pep has the luxury of being able to ticky tacka away to his hearts content. Amorim may need to learn some pragmatism this season and I don’t see why it has to be all tactics or bust.

I think Amorim is the guy we want in charge after the purge, after the crap season. I just hope things start clicking for him soon as there’s not really been much green shoots to latch onto and I’m worried we go into a death spiral if we can’t start even seeing some sort of improvements soon.
 
When you hear players like Maguire coming out and saying Amorim is totally opposite to ETH then that can only be a good thing. However it just means these players are totally useless at playing the way Amorim wants.
 
I’m all for giving Amorim time and haven’t really set any goals this season outside of don’t get relegated , so nobody can accuse me of being harsh on him.

But this is not a squad that should be languishing in lower half of table. No amount of waffly “it’s all the squad” can disguise the fact that this squad finished 8th last season with an injury crisis that Amorim isn’t having to manage. I also think the squad isn’t weaker, with ugarte and Yoro defo good starting quality players.

I accept confidence is rock bottom but I don’t accept that lower then top half of league is “as good as could be expected”. That’s nonsense that’s been spouted to imply that the manager couldn’t do much better, well he could and if his “I’m doing it this way regardless of players” continues to struggle picking up points he won’t be around long enough to make it work.

Some fans have this weird managerial fetish that can be all or nothing , the manager is the messiah or pariah. I believe Amorim could have the quality to do great things but I fear he may not get the time to achieve it if the team doesn’t respond soon to whatever it is he wants. Managers have to adapt . Quality managers make alterations, sometimes game by game , if they feel it increases their teams chances of winning.

I always felt that losing in champions league final to Madrid was a powerful lesson for Klopp, particularly in the final win against spurs a season later. He learned how to win ugly and pragmatically. This was something Ferguson regularly did and only cheat code unlimited quality pep has the luxury of being able to ticky tacka away to his hearts content. Amorim may need to learn some pragmatism this season and I don’t see why it has to be all tactics or bust.

I think Amorim is the guy we want in charge after the purge, after the crap season. I just hope things start clicking for him soon as there’s not really been much green shoots to latch onto and I’m worried we go into a death spiral if we can’t start even seeing some sort of improvements soon.
Unfortunately I think it is all about the squad, some have been unable to grasp previous systems and are at it again. I agree that for once we have to let a manager get rid of players and rebuild the squad and give him time to do it. In the past we have let outside influences like who is big on social media dictate who stays.That has to change. I also tend to agree he could tinker with his system slightly without ditching it like ETH did. However not bringing in a striker and LWB is still going to cause us issues. The recruitment of players at this club has been laughable.
 
To be fair Fergie either would have sorted the Rashford situation one way or the other years ago. Either got him playing well or shipped him out.

However, It's not as simple as all that. I think if we had a stable coaching team throughout the time Rashford was here the same would have happened. Every time a new manager comes in it's a clean slate and they all think they can get the best out of the player and also may not have been informed of the exact nature of the issues under the previous guy.
It took some time for Fergie to get the team going too. We need some patience
 
It took some time for Fergie to get the team going too. We need some patience

Agreed on that point, we need to give him til the Summer at least. If performances haven't improved consistently come the end of the season then it'll be time to have a conversation about his future.

He came into a mess, is trying to bed in a new system and has had a rough run of fixtures. The run after the FA Cup is more forgiving and we really should start picking up some wins. If not he'll be in trouble.
 
Agreed on that point, we need to give him til the Summer at least. If performances haven't improved consistently come the end of the season then it'll be time to have a conversation about his future.

He came into a mess, is trying to bed in a new system and has had a rough run of fixtures. The run after the FA Cup is more forgiving and we really should start picking up some wins. If not he'll be in trouble.
Sir Alex also had to get rid of what he saw as bad influences at the club. Ruben has to be given time to do this and bring the right players with the right character.
 
h
Unfortunately I think it is all about the squad, some have been unable to grasp previous systems and are at it again. I agree that for once we have to let a manager get rid of players and rebuild the squad and give him time to do it. In the past we have let outside influences like who is big on social media dictate who stays.That has to change. I also tend to agree he could tinker with his system slightly without ditching it like ETH did. However not bringing in a striker and LWB is still going to cause us issues. The recruitment of players at this club has been laughable.
But every manager has to work with the squad they inherit. I don’t understand why people are presuming the issue is all the squad and that if somehow we don’t get relegated it’s been good that the manager stuck to his guns. What exactly are we gaining from that ?

Again, I’m a long haul guy who will be one of the last to turn on a United manager, I just haven’t seen anybody explain the benefits of this rigid way of managing.

People have convinced themselves “well United managers have foolishly gone back to being pragmatic when it wasn’t working so maybe persisting with it is the best option for some reason”. You are correct that recruitment has been a massive issue but sticking with a failing system that doesn’t suit a squad doesn’t really sound wise on any meaningful level.

Like if we don’t beat Southampton in 2 weeks time , he’s gonna be under massive pressure as they are dogs*it bad. I want Amorim to get time, I just don’t think he’s gonna get it unless this system starts picking up points soon and feel that may require him to be more pragmatic and look to get more out of our players.