gaffs
Full Member
They want a manager who has never played a 4-4-3 to play that system. Somehow they have convinced themselves that if we played 4 at the back and with wingers we wont be in this position. Its as if they have short term memory loss and dont remember how shite we were the past 2 years under Ten Hag and the 10 years before that under different managers who all played 4 at the back. This past decade we were craving for managers to try something different and as one comes along, who btw knows what the feck he is doing, and tries something different, they go after him with a pitchfork asking him to revert back for MAYBE short term wins. Its still a maybe. There is no guarantee going to a back 4 will yield different results.
Exactly this.
I have asked it many a time on this thread and no one has been able to point to how this formation or system is causing us to leak goals. The majority are down to individual mistakes. Yesterday, two crosses when we have 5 in the back line. Would removing a man from the back line help that?
The 433 v 3421 talk is so lazy too. Yes, some players may not currently be ideally suited to a 3421, but if Slot, Arteta, Klopp or Pep came in, would many of them be suited to their versions of a 433 ? Likely not, because the squad is just really poor, unfit and lacking confidence. Only time on the training ground, better players signed and a pre season will help this.
Said it before, but i think this team went without playing much of a system for the past few years. Ten Hag gave up and reverted to ad hoc football because of the pressure. Not fans want Amorim to drop his principles. That is why there was never any patterns of play under ETH. Their brains need to be re-wired to start taking instruction again and it will take time.