?
No guarantee, my point was that Ruud was already seeing results and a turnaround in confidence, including a decent draw v Chelsea. He was also using tactics the players were used to.
Amorim didn’t want to come until the Summer himself and neither ETH nor Ruud looked in risk if relegation. It seems an insane gamble if they brought in Amorim mid-season to risk relegation whilst implementing a completely different system.
As i said, Ruud had some soft games, bar Chelsea, who did not come to OT with very much that night.
And as i pointed out, these players would likely give up on a caretaker manager when the going gets tough. Too many of them are downhill runners.
You have made many posts on this thread, but can't seem to explain why Amorims tactics or system is costing us?
Does the system make Maz hack down a Bournemouth player from behind to give away a pen?
Does it get Bruno sent off?
Does it cause Onana to get lobbed from a corner or let one in that is going straight down the middle?
Does it make Hojlund or Zirksee not able to control a football?
Does it prevent Martinez from only being 5 foot something and incable of winning a header?
Would another system mean Casemiro and Eriksen were suddenly 26 and in their prime again?
Fact is, under Ten Hag this lot played ad hoc football, which would only ever get them so far - Moments FC. If we are ever to be competitive, they need to learn a system, which isnt easy mid season.
Amorim is learning game by game which players he can potentially take forward. The rest will be on the chopping board.
He is already trying to change the culture by putting his foot down with Rashford. And im hearing some people dont like this now. Some want to bring him back one more time. Without being crude, some of our fans have battered wife syndrome. We think if a player like Rashford gets one more chance he may change! He wont.
Given that ETH was sacked in October, it is better to do that during the season, then have a pre season, sign some players, only to find out that some of the players he saw pre season can't cut it in competitive games.
MUFC would never leave a caretaker in charge for 6 months of the season. When has any club ever allowed that to happen?
It doesn't matter which manager came in or when, or which system he employed. I think we all agree that the vast majority of these players are not good enough to take us forward. That would be the same in a 433 or a 3421.
We are not getting relegated so i would much rather us finish 17th and the manager learn a shit ton about his current squad, then add to it in the summer, then have a caretaker in for 6 months, for us to only finish mid table. 17th or 8th. What is the difference really?