- Joined
- Jul 8, 2023
- Messages
- 121
- Lindelof who hasn't played all seasonBy first team, you mean:
- Backup GK
- Backup CB
- Makeshift 18 year old CB
- Makeshift LB
- Backup CM
- 38 year old Evans
- Bayinder who hasn't played all year
- Anthony
- Lindelof who hasn't played all seasonBy first team, you mean:
- Backup GK
- Backup CB
- Makeshift 18 year old CB
- Makeshift LB
- Backup CM
I don't think so, lack of effort will get him benched but not dropped completely. He wasn't dropped like this prior to City and his effort levels then wasn't too dissimilarRashford has clearly been dropped due to lack of effort in both training and in games.
I think that only happens if you have an upper management that is not supportive of you.More likely you'll end up having to grovel back to them because no work is gettng done and then they'll tell you that they want more money regardless of turning up late because of how valuable you've just proven they are....and at the end you are right back where you started except with a large chunk of your authority gone.
- Lindelof who hasn't played all season
- 38 year old Evans
- Bayinder who hasn't played all year
- Anthony
It isn't something completely different. It is all aimed at the same thing which is making the team better and harder to beat, and creating a culture where team mates trust in each other.
If you choose to send a message about standards, you can't really pick and choose which standards or who they do and don't apply to. You can't be not good enough but its ok because its for a different reason than someone else who isn't good enough. That'd be like a work place deducting pay from anyone who turns up late because they want to see an improvement in overall performance, but then giving the extra money to people who turn up on time ad try hard but get next to feck all work done. In theory it might kick the latecomers up the backside. More likely you'll end up having to grovel back to them because no work is gettng done and then they'll tell you that they want more money regardless of turning up late because of how valuable you've just proven they are....and at the end you are right back where you started except with a large chunk of your authority gone.
It is the strongest team that spurs could currently field, no?Why would an awful united squad make the spurs one any more "first team"?
That analogy is pretty bad but, sticking with the employment thing, an employer can reward quality and quantity of output. As in, both the effort of what they do and the outcomes that effort achieves. Sales people can get a bonus for the number of calls and the number of sales. It’s completely normal for employees who don’t make the minimum effort required to be called out by their boss. And that’s a separate issue to whether they do their job well when they can be arsed to do it at all.
Getting back to football, effort is the bare minimum expected. And it’s perfectly reasonable to bench players who aren’t putting in the expected effort, whether or not they are more talented than other players picked ahead of them who are meeting expectations in terms of effort.
Yes but that's missing the point again and trying to narrow the team's problems down to Rashford not putting in enough effort.
The problems are more deep routed than that and saying "this isn't good enough" doesn't work if you don't look at all the things that aren't good enough and apply the same to them.
If you freeze out a player for a lack of effort, or a bad attitude, then, unecessarily pick others who, regardless of the reason, you know won't perform any better. All you are doing is confusing everyone and weakening people's trust in you.
If Amorim is going to be ruthless and uncompromising with standards (which I think is what we need), it has to go across the board. Not "you're nowhere near good enough but you try hard so it doesn’t matter"...that's for school children, not managing a team of elite level athletes.
He can be supportive of players and give them a chance of course, but I think in this instance, immediately after the big public who har about dropping players and needing everyone to "suffer" and reach standards that are set, it wasn't the time to do that. It was the time to pick as many players as possible who set or get close to those standards.
Instead it was some half way house where certain players kept their place who could have been rested, and others were replaced with basically the lowest level performers in our squad.
When a coach is talking about standards it’s normally first and foremost about attitude in training and giving your all to be the best version of yourself. And that’s obviously something rashford isn’t doing at that point - so Amorim is totally right to not select him.
That other players also may have bad performances doesn’t change that. You can’t say an Anthony for example isn’t good enough so therefore Amorim should not select him as he is part of the squad with that Amorim has to work with. As a coach you can’t just say half of the squad isn’t good enough and they won’t play again. Your job is it to make the most out of the potential in front of you. And therefor everyone has to work as hard as possible. I think Amorim handles this perfectly.
I like Marcus but that’s the end of the road for him if he isn’t capable of packing down. He will be our ozil
Im confident too. Unless some cnut Spanish club kicks us outMy bet is that we gonna win Europa League this season with Amorim in charge
I disagree though. You can and should say that - or maybe not so much say it as you wat to try and support your players, but certainly apply it. Otherwise the only criteria you have for improving the standard of your squad is how hard they try. You can fish a bunch of randoms out of the stands who will try extremely hard for £100,000 a week and get you relegated to League 2.
Again this approach works for school children or managing a general group of people doing stuff people are generally capable of doing. These are elite level athletes, paid tens of thousands a week to play for one of the biggest football clubs in the world. It is not unfair at all to expect them to be quite good at football and to have a cut off point of how not good you will tolerate them being. In fact its pretty vital to have this.
Yes Amorim has to work with the players he has, but he has better players than the ones he picked the other night. I can buy that there are mitigating factors like being concerned about fitness levels. There might be all kinds of data in the background or other work he's done with the players that completely explains it, but I don't buy that someone's work rate or attitude is an important standard but their abiliy on a football pitch isn't, and that you can therefore address one and ignore the other.
Dominated.By first team, you mean:
- Backup GK
- Backup CB
- Makeshift 18 year old CB
- Makeshift LB
- Backup CM
You have a point that ability is of course also a factor but I think as a first step you have to look at the attitude of the players available. Just make sure that everyone pushes to the limit is a good start.
There will come a point though where Amorim has to make a call and judge who is good enough qualitywise, there you are right of course. And I am sure he will get rid of players that are not good enough in his eyes. But I would imagine he will do this in a more quiet way. I think it’s sensible what he is doing, that’s my point only. If he would trim the squad right now he won’t have enough players. He will wait for the transfer windows to get up the quality.
Exactly why I'm not all that fussed about losses at this time, so long as there's no debacling
He was very transparent about his thinking and plan from the start and growing pains are part of the process of building a winner.
The difference between the hiccups now is that you can see a cohesive vision in place and actually being executed even in the early days.
It will definitely get ugly at times, given the unbalanced squad, but the gaffer deserves patience and time to really mold the squad to his liking.
It's the middle of the season and if we only picked players who are good enough to play for united we'd be fielding a team of around 7 players.It isn't something completely different. It is all aimed at the same thing which is making the team better and harder to beat, and creating a culture where team mates trust in each other.
If you choose to send a message about standards, you can't really pick and choose which standards or who they do and don't apply to. You can't be not good enough but its ok because its for a different reason than someone else who isn't good enough. That'd be like a work place deducting pay from anyone who turns up late because they want to see an improvement in overall performance, but then giving the extra money to people who turn up on time ad try hard but get next to feck all work done. In theory it might kick the latecomers up the backside. More likely you'll end up having to grovel back to them because no work is gettng done and then they'll tell you that they want more money regardless of turning up late because of how valuable you've just proven they are....and at the end you are right back where you started except with a large chunk of your authority gone.
If he can make the team functional and not playing counter attack and insha allah, i dont think he needs 600m.... even half of that seems to be more than enough. Which is sad. Why did we keep Ten Hag before sacking him early in the season, I never know. I would argue Mc Tominay would have been a good option to have as well in his team. We are approaching Klopp/Pep team level of hardwork from the players and its really good to see.Let's not forget Amorim hasn't even had a preseason to train his team, let alone bring in a single player, yet the progress is there.
Give him one full transfer window and a preseason for training, and this guy will have us challenging for the title.
Imagine what Amorim could have done with £646m and three transfer windows, which Ten Hag had..
If he can make the team functional and not playing counter attack and insha allah, i dont think he needs 600m.... even half of that seems to be more than enough. Which is sad. Why did we keep Ten Hag before sacking him early in the season, I never know. I would argue Mc Tominay would have been a good option to have as well in his team. We are approaching Klopp/Pep team level of hardwork from the players and its really good to see.
I even think he’s going to fix that awful way Utd have of announcing the Utd line up on social mediaThe biggest compliment I can give the manager is that I now look forward to matchday.
I was driving to work yesterday morning and the sports news came on, the result wasn’t announced it was “Amorim denies Spurs defeat was of Rashfords absence “ Amorim must be shit sick of the Rashford United questions.I'm tired of Rashford - if he wasn't an academy, local lad no one would give two shits about him
Ama?Premier League doing another AMA on Ruben Amorim on their Twitter - that seems obsessive already. I honestly doesn't remember, but I don't think there was as much public pressure on Pep or Klopp when they first came to Premier League? The current obsession on Ruben seems unhealthy.
Probably because pep and klopp was well known to be fair. And from popular leagues. They already made a name for themselves. Amorim will hopefully make a name for himself in the premier league as being the one since fergie to bring us back challenging.Premier League doing another AMA on Ruben Amorim on their Twitter - that seems obsessive already. I honestly doesn't remember, but I don't think there was as much public pressure on Pep or Klopp when they first came to Premier League? The current obsession on Ruben seems unhealthy.
Ama?