Don’t turn this into a transfer forum thread @hobbers
I think he's doing a great job so far and there are clear signs of progression and a cohesive style of play.
My one criticism (of the team, not him) is that defensively we're still poor and we concede far too many goals, regardless of individual errors or from set pieces. This needs to be worked on otherwise we'll end up with far more defeats than we'd care for.
This.He’s doing a great job. Our team individually are just not good enough and they have so many individual brain farts that NO manager can accommodate for. What we are is much harder to beat in the main and are having more possession and a higher line and press.
We're not selling Rashford for £60m.if we sell Rashford at 60M (hopefully a Saudi club offers that), buy Gyokeres/Osimhen at 60-70M
Wirtz at 120M
get Alphonso davies on a free
just 120M-130M and we have a starting XI that opponents fear
Branthwaite is not a priority
I'm not sure why people still think we should change our formation during the game. Amorim's system is 3 and the back. Chopping and changing is the worst thing we could do.You can clearly see improvement in general play, no doubts about that. But he's going a bit overkill with the rotation (Bayandir and Antony as #10 seemed a bit too much). I would also like us to switch to more of a standard 4231 rather than going for Evans as 3rd CB when we're already one goal down, that was a bit strange tbh.
I think so too, Martinez hasn't convinced at all since his honeymoon first season. He's been a borderline liability since coming back from his nasty injury.He probably is.
I’m glad our manager doesn’t see it as one. I’m sick of seeing people say that. Still plenty to play for and achieve, even with our new manager having to adapt and coach this bunch to play his way as we go along.How are there people complaining? This season is a write off like a pre season.
He’s even come out so many times and said he’s going to implement his style regardless of results.
Bear with him, give him atleast 3 seasons!!
How are there people complaining? This season is a write off like a pre season.
He’s even come out so many times and said he’s going to implement his style regardless of results.
Bear with him, give him atleast 3 seasons!!
3 seasons is pure madness, if results don't improve by the same time of next season, for me it's clear that we have to move on from him.How are there people complaining? This season is a write off like a pre season.
He’s even come out so many times and said he’s going to implement his style regardless of results.
Bear with him, give him atleast 3 seasons!!
A clear indicator of that was under Eth when we would grind out wins with very poor performances and the underlying stats proved it was not sustainable. Yet many posters just kept banging on about the results (which were awful as well overall) and how each unconvincing win was a “corner turned”.It's almost 2025 and some people are still ignoring and dismissing underlying stats such as xG...
I’m glad our manager doesn’t see it as one. I’m sick of seeing people say that. Still plenty to play for and achieve, even with our new manager having to adapt and coach this bunch to play his way as we go along.
This is exactly the problem with the club for over a decade now, casually writing off seasons. While I get that keeping on ETH was a death sentence, Nottingham fecking Forrest are currently in 4th. If we managed to string some wins together we'll be up there come the end of the season. If there's progress on the pitch I don't mind losing the odd game, but we can't be losing consistently moving into next season. We also need to build momentum.
How on earth is the season a write off. We'll be going for as high a league finish as possible, and no doubt going all in on the Europa League, while we're also still in the FA CupHow are there people complaining? This season is a write off like a pre season.
He’s even come out so many times and said he’s going to implement his style regardless of results.
Bear with him, give him atleast 3 seasons!!
Rashford has clearly been dropped due to lack of effort in both training and in games.I've been impressed with him but with Rashford he risks falling into the sane trap ETH did with Sancho.
I'm entirely for demanding standards and dropping any player who doesn't meet them (or goes crying to the media)...but if the week later you're bringing on Johnny Evans who runs like an 80 year old, or picking Antony directly in place of the person you've made an example of, the message you're sending isn't that everyone has to meet a certain standard, it's that, for some reason, only Marcus Rashford does.
That won't get you a positive reaction. It will get no reaction or a hostile one.
There's a bit of a by when it's a league cup game and the manager is still learning about the players but in the case of Evans his lack of sharpness and juat slowness MUST be evident in training. If it isn't then our training is crap.
Amorim paid the price for too much experimenting and too much trust in players that the football suits should have told him have no chance here. Disappointed because I think Spurs weren't very good. Oh well. Let's hope the tinkering stops soon.
I've been impressed with him but with Rashford he risks falling into the sane trap ETH did with Sancho.
I'm entirely for demanding standards and dropping any player who doesn't meet them (or goes crying to the media)...but if the week later you're bringing on Johnny Evans who runs like an 80 year old, or picking Antony directly in place of the person you've made an example of, the message you're sending isn't that everyone has to meet a certain standard, it's that, for some reason, only Marcus Rashford does.
That won't get you a positive reaction. It will get no reaction or a hostile one.
There's a bit of a by when it's a league cup game and the manager is still learning about the players but in the case of Evans his lack of sharpness and juat slowness MUST be evident in training. If it isn't then our training is crap.
I don't really understand what your point is here, Evans shouldn't have been brought on because he's slow?I've been impressed with him but with Rashford he risks falling into the sane trap ETH did with Sancho.
I'm entirely for demanding standards and dropping any player who doesn't meet them (or goes crying to the media)...but if the week later you're bringing on Johnny Evans who runs like an 80 year old, or picking Antony directly in place of the person you've made an example of, the message you're sending isn't that everyone has to meet a certain standard, it's that, for some reason, only Marcus Rashford does.
That won't get you a positive reaction. It will get no reaction or a hostile one.
There's a bit of a by when it's a league cup game and the manager is still learning about the players but in the case of Evans his lack of sharpness and juat slowness MUST be evident in training. If it isn't then our training is crap.
I've been impressed with him but with Rashford he risks falling into the sane trap ETH did with Sancho.
I'm entirely for demanding standards and dropping any player who doesn't meet them (or goes crying to the media)...but if the week later you're bringing on Johnny Evans who runs like an 80 year old, or picking Antony directly in place of the person you've made an example of, the message you're sending isn't that everyone has to meet a certain standard, it's that, for some reason, only Marcus Rashford does.
That won't get you a positive reaction. It will get no reaction or a hostile one.
There's a bit of a by when it's a league cup game and the manager is still learning about the players but in the case of Evans his lack of sharpness and juat slowness MUST be evident in training. If it isn't then our training is crap.
Standards and talent are two different things. Standards are about working hard for your teammates, professional behavior, positive body language/belief, and knowing your role.
If Antony is working hard, pressing high, making sprints, putting in a defensive shift - those are standards we should expect of ALL United players, regardless of their talent. It’s a question of mindset and effort.
Want to be clear, we ultimately will need a team full of individuals with high standards AND talent, but we do not have that right now.
We’ve prioritized talent and sacrificed standards for far too long. This is the way forward.
I've been impressed with him but with Rashford he risks falling into the sane trap ETH did with Sancho.
I'm entirely for demanding standards and dropping any player who doesn't meet them (or goes crying to the media)...but if the week later you're bringing on Johnny Evans who runs like an 80 year old, or picking Antony directly in place of the person you've made an example of, the message you're sending isn't that everyone has to meet a certain standard, it's that, for some reason, only Marcus Rashford does.
That won't get you a positive reaction. It will get no reaction or a hostile one.
There's a bit of a by when it's a league cup game and the manager is still learning about the players but in the case of Evans his lack of sharpness and juat slowness MUST be evident in training. If it isn't then our training is crap.
Rashford has clearly been dropped due to lack of effort in both training and in games.
You're talking about something completely different which is a players ability. We know Antony and Evans aren't good enough for this club, but they aren't players you associate with a lack of effort. That's the difference and that's why the manager is willing to play them. Rashford can't even give him the bare minimum which is a 100% effort in training. You're blind if you can't see it, especially when our manager has spelt it out for you with his answers in interviews.
It feels like we will become a very good side under him.
It isn't something completely different. It is all aimed at the same thing which is making the team better and harder to beat, and creating a culture where team mates trust in each other.
If you choose to send a message about standards, you can't really pick and choose which standards or who they do and don't apply to. You can't be not good enough but its ok because its for a different reason than someone else who isn't good enough. That'd be like a work place deducting pay from anyone who turns up late because they want to see an improvement in overall performance, but then giving the extra money to people who turn up on time ad try hard but get next to feck all work done. In theory it might kick the latecomers up the backside. More likely you'll end up having to grovel back to them because no work is gettng done and then they'll tell you that they want more money regardless of turning up late because of how valuable you've just proven they are....and at the end you are right back where you started except with a large chunk of your authority gone.