tomaldinho1
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2015
- Messages
- 20,796
Ole’s legacy.
Because they are not being coached properly. Bruno has been a liability for ages.
Would he consider do we think a 433? Whilst keeping his core football philosophy as it were.
He definitely was, but this group pre ETH still had these problems. It’s like players join and there’s some culture there that saps away at their combative side. ETH had to deal with a lot of crap with clearing out the squad and I do think the replacements bar Antony are generally much better in terms of attitude/workrate etc. but the hard thing now is replacing Rashford and Bruno.
Very true. Its all mental, which doesn't paint a very flattering picture of ETH's time here.
Ole’s legacy.
Because we play a player on the left flank who is no threat, and the players who can be a threat on the left albeit inconsistent in the center.Not just chatting about the formation but there's some folk saying that they always knew that it wouldn't work. Unfortunately they never put this into writing at any point until now - but they were definitely thinking it, honest.
I had turned it over to MUTV's radio commentary and they went ballistic when Dalot did that.injury time, dalot gets the ball 30 yards out, we have about half our team in front of him, he decides to go for glory and wang it half way up into the stand. Look on dear rubins face said it all.
Our players lack football and emotional intelligence.
It’s been like this for coming up 12 years in May. Literally. It’s been a problem way before ETH.
There is something legitimately wrong at this football club. Even top rated managers turn to shite.
I want him to keep his style but maybe a formation is better for the league?Will be interesting to see if he does, didn't he adapt after a rough start to the Everton game then switch back? Nothing wrong with having a strong philosophy about how you want to play but being able to adapt and present new challenges to the opposition is what the best do.
Wanted to pull my hair out at that moment.injury time, dalot gets the ball 30 yards out, we have about half our team in front of him, he decides to go for glory and wang it half way up into the stand. Look on dear rubins face said it all.
Our players lack football and emotional intelligence.
You make it sound like we played well in these last 18 months with 4231.
My mistake. Completely misread your post about the FA bit and thought you were talking about post League Cup season as well. Apologies!On what planet is a solo 6 and inside FBs a 4231?
ETH played a double pivot, width from fbs, and inside wingers only in his first season. Typically Casemiro and Eriksen. Nice and compact from them. Fbs doing what they did best. And rashford scored 30 goals.
Then he got his Pep hard on, and decided he was gonna play a solo 6, and FB supposedly stepping into midfield to cover but done terribly, and width provided by the wingers with no overlapping. And every player looked worse as a result.
Agreed. The source of all problems were the Glazers - in allowing Fergie to basically appoint Moyes, then allowing Woodward to effectively run the club for a decade despite having no football experience to do so. Fortunately we finally have a proper executive team in place alongside a quality manager, so we have to give this process time to flesh itself out.
I think we are somewhat better suited to 4231 but as you say we are crap regardless. We need a massive overhaul but have limited funds. We would probably lose 8 games out of 10 against a ten men Liverpool.Yeah but to say that we well suited for 4231 is a total rewrite of history. We're crap no matter which formation we play! I'd expect us to play badly even using Todd Boehly's genius 4-4-3 formation.
Yeah but to say that we well suited for 4231 is a total rewrite of history. We're crap no matter which formation we play! I'd expect us to play badly even using Todd Boehly's genius 4-4-3 formation.
Reminded me of the days I had a season ticket, and there were about 2mins left of an away FA Cup tie, and we're drawing.injury time, dalot gets the ball 30 yards out, we have about half our team in front of him, he decides to go for glory and wang it half way up into the stand. Look on dear rubins face said it all.
Our players lack football and emotional intelligence.
Yeah you and @sammyhol are completely right about that part.I think we are somewhat better suited to 4231 but as you say we are crap regardless. We need a massive overhaul but have limited funds. We would probably lose 8 games out of 10 against a ten men Liverpool.
I think United made a mistake going for Amorim. Not because he is a bad manager, but his 343 is too far from what we have in the squad of players to fill the roles.
They should have got a standard 4231 manager. The players would have slotted in. We could improve the team in January and Summer and kept some sort of continuity of philosphy and tactics.
As of now, we need to solve wing backs, striker, CB and attacking mid. If we had stuck with 4231 wed only need wingers and striker.
If Amorim gets sacked, wed have probably sold aload of wingers and brought specialist wing backs, only to be left with a new manager that wants wingers and full backs again.
Seems daft to me to bring in such a big change of tactics right now when we rebuilding.
One big problem, is that we have so many games over this next month, that Amorim isn't going to have much time to get them actually training. It'll be play the game, recover, play again, recover etc.Very upset with the result like everyone else, but not necessarily with the performance.
It's difficult to give the impression that you played well in a 2-3 loss at home to an underdog team, but I genuinely think we will improve a lot until the rest of the season, and then especially after we add some much needed reinforcements in key areas.
A new LWB is coming for sure and it's needed too. That alone will help massively both offensively and defensively. Imagine all the situations today where Dalot received the ball in the LW spot around the opposition box. I'm not saying we'll manage to sign this player but Davies for example would've probably made more of those. Or a wrong-footed (so, right-footed in this case) full-back there that makes better decisions than Dalot.
Also, I'm not gonna go all kneejerk and dismiss these players as deadwood but we probably win this game today if Onana wasn't having one of his brainfart moments and we actually had a taller LCB instead of Martínez to mark Milenkovic on that first corner. Or just put someone else on the Serbian. It's just about fine margins, especially when you don't have the perfect profiles for most positions, and it all went to shit today.
I edited my reply to you once I realised what an utter spanner I had been. I misread the part about the FA cup, failing to see the part about getting to the final - not winning - and thought you were saying last season was good. Then I was assuming you thought our formation last year was the same as our first. Then I got cocky and thought I was being clever with a snarky reply. Now I have egg on my face. If I was a decent man I would say sorry and apologise for it, promising to read things better next time. But I'm Scottish so...The last time this squad played 4231 consistently it won a cup, got to another final, got to a European quarter, and came 3rd…
We then changed it for no reason whatsoever, other than Pep had supposedly reinvented a 150 year old game, and have gone backwards ever since
Where is the re-writing of history?
And are you honestly saying that you believe that we wouldn’t have looked better today with a single change in this shape:
-————onana————-
Dalot-Yoro-de ligt-maz
——ugarte-Mainoo—-
—Amad-Bruno-Garna—
————-Hojlund———-
Square pegs, square holes
Like I said though, Ruben was a known quantity, and he deserves time to implement his system… but there are so many roles in it that we don’t have natural fits for.
I understand where you are coming for and you are right in saying that we'd get better immediate results in the formation you show played in mid-block.The last time this squad played 4231 consistently it won a cup, got to another final, got to a European quarter, and came 3rd…
We then changed it for no reason whatsoever, other than Pep had supposedly reinvented a 150 year old game, and have gone backwards ever since
Where is the re-writing of history?
And are you honestly saying that you believe that we wouldn’t have looked better today with a single change in this shape:
-————onana————-
Dalot-Yoro-de ligt-maz
——ugarte-Mainoo—-
—Amad-Bruno-Garna—
————-Hojlund———-
Square pegs, square holes
Like I said though, Ruben was a known quantity, and he deserves time to implement his system… but there are so many roles in it that we don’t have natural fits for.
This is true but he will hopefully have come in and realised that most of the players need to be moved on eventually.Tbh, no manager should be so wedded to a system. It's about playing to the strengths of your players.
This is true but he will hopefully have come in and realised that most of the players need to be moved on eventually.
I understand where you are coming for and you are right in saying that we'd get better immediate results in the formation you show played in mid-block.
However, like Ruben said, we can do that & be in the same place the next season again. Because I am sure you'd agree that team & playing that way isn't going to win as a title or get us back to the top.
I think formations are irrelevant anyway. Our style of play, our pressing, our movement, our passing, our speed of passing, our ability to create space, our guile in breaking down low block set-ups - all those things need to improve for us to become a better team. And a formation is immaterial to all those principles.
They drew 2-2 to Crystal Palace today.City is not in decline. It was a temporary blip. Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea and City will seal top 4.
One big problem, is that we have so many games over this next month, that Amorim isn't going to have much time to get them actually training. It'll be play the game, recover, play again, recover etc.
The only teams I'd be confident about getting top 4 are Liverpool and Arsenal. Everyone else's form has been too mixed. Chelsea is the exception but I don't trust them yet.So who you thinking we pipping for top 4 from city, Arsenal, liverpool, chelsea?
Amorim Sporting team preferred to have had one inverted WB who plays like a winger. Amad and Antony fits that profile.Why is amad not being tried for the no.10 role? Dalot and Maz on the wings? Why is rashford and garnacho getting shoehorned into those positions? (Ignore rashford, he is borderline useless)