Riccardo Montolivo, value for money?

andersj

Nick Powell Expert
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
4,636
Location
Copenhagen
The last couple of years statistics have become more and more accepted as a reliable and good helper within football. Even Sir Alex Ferguson has hired a statistical analyst. I've never been a huge fan of this type of measurements within football, but are beginning to mellow to the idea that if one use it right, it can be very useful as a supplement.

For fun I tried it on a player that I've liked for a long time, and who I see would love to see at Old Trafford. I was lucky enough to see him live once this season, and he really stood out as a talented player. He seem to me like a player who would be a natural replacement to Paul Scholes. He only have one year left of his contract at Fiorentina, and would be available for a fee in the region of £10-15 mill. That do not look like a big risk for an Italian international aged 25 years old, and I would assume that if he did not work out we would could easily get most of the money back.

The number shows that Montolivo is the player who makes the most passes in Fiorentina. Last season he averaged 64,8 passes per game. That is close to fifty percent more than the next man on the list in Fiorentina. Pretty exceptional, actually. Paul Scholes was, to no surprise, the player who made the most passes at Manchester United, with 61,7 per game (about 15-17 percent more than Carrick and Fletcher). I almost started laughing when I saw how many accurate long balls Scholes play per game, averaging 8,4. Montolivo is on 5,7 per game. Montolivo had a passing success of 83 percent. Scholes was at 90 percent.

(Xavi had 110 passes, 27 % more than the next man and 7,4 long balls. He had a passing success of 94 %.)

Statistics also shows us that RM makes two key passes per game. Paul Scholes where at 0,9, while Ryan Giggs (our most effective player with regard to this) made 2,4 key passes per game (might be worth mentioning that while Paul Scholes was our most safe player in terms of passing, Ryan Giggs was one of our "riskiest" with a passing success of only 73 %). Montolivo made 0,8 dribbles per game, compared to Giggs 1,4 and Scholes 0,3. He was dispossessed a lot more often than both Scholes and Giggs, and this appears to be his biggest weakness "statistically". Montolivo was dispossessed 2,1 times per game, while Giggs was at 1,2 and Scholes at 0,5 (!!!). Montolivo had two goals and three assists.

(Xavi made 2,4 key passes per game, 1,3 successful dribbles per game and was dispossessed 1,4 times per game. He had three goals and seven assists.)

In defense it seems like he would represent an improvement compared to our current players. Montolivo made 2,5 interceptions per game and 2,8 successful tackles per game. Scholes made 1,6 interceptions and 1,3 successful tackles per game. Ryan Giggs was at 0,9 int and 1,4 tackles. Michael Carrick, our best midfielder in this perspective, stood at 2 and 2,2. He also have a higher duel success than our midfielders with the exception of our Scottish and Irish friends, of course .

(Xavi made one interception and one successful tackle p/g.)

There has been a lot of former Serie A players struggling to live up to their potential in Premier League and actually some former Premier League players struggling to live up to their potential in Serie A. From what I have seen of Montolivo, he seems like a player who would be better suited for the Premier League than Serie A (a bold claim, considering he is Italian, I know).

He is a versatile midfielder. During his career he has been used in a Pirlo-role, as an AM in a diamond formation and as a inside right or left in a three man midfield, and should have a lot of the qualities needed to play in a two-man midfield as well.

Hopefully Ferguson has already made a call to his close friend, Marcello Lippi, and gotten an update on the player. Marcello Lippi is known to have confidence in Riccardo Montolivos abilities. Montolivo was a regular in Lippis Italy. Lippis records speak for itself, but surely the man who brought Zinedine Zidane, Edgar Davids, Didier Deschamps, Thierry Henry and Pavel Nedved to Juventus, and once claimed that Paul Scholes was the first man he would build a team around if he was given the opportunity, should know a thing or two about football.
 
I watched a lot of him whilst I was watching Ljajic last year, and I didn't think he was that impressive.

Btw - where did you get those stats from?
 
He was good in the world cup. Didnt catch much of him last season but he's a good player from what I've seen before it.
 
That's a kind of unfair poke at the him. It's well written and he clearly states how he feels about stats and how you could view them.
 
Where's the statistic like "number of bottle jobs" or "number of games where he went missing"?

Talented and slightly less of an enigma than before but is still inconsistent and can only play in one position.

Yes, Aquilani is better, if more injury-prone.
 
Where's the statistic like "number of bottle jobs" or "number of games where he went missing"?

Talented and slightly less of an enigma than before but is still inconsistent and can only play in one position.

Yes, Aquilani is better, if more injury-prone.

If you find those numbers, please report back to me. Would be interested to see Sneijders numbers - a player who definitely goes missing or "bottle out" a lot but is rated at £35 mill.

I like Aquilani, and I think he has decent potential. But in my opinion Montolivo has always been the most talented, and the better player of the two, with an exception of the 2007/2008 season.
 
Didn't know he had joined Milan on a free transfer. Wish we were interested in him, he is a proper CM who would have undoubtedly improved us.
 
He looked very good in the Euros but those Italian players rarely leave the country. Between us and Milan he'd have chosen them every single time I think.
 
He looked very good in the Euros but those Italian players rarely leave the country. Between us and Milan he'd have chosen them every single time I think.

True that. Had Balotelli been a full shilling he would probably still be in Italy. Bottom line is unlike English clubs, Italian clubs like having the top Italian players playing for them.

English clubs in general seem to only prefer English players when either laws are brought in to force them to, or if they have a British manager.
 
Would have been worth a punt at least. A good player. Perhaps he's a major Scholes fan and would have relished the opportunity to train and play with him.
 
I still don't see it with Montolivo, found him underwhelming in the Euros again. I'll gladly eat humble pie if he proves to be a great player at Milan, but I think he's a level below us. He's got decent technique but doesn't make nearly as many good passes as he should - the one good ball he plays per game masks how many other bad decisions he makes.
 
True that. Had Balotelli been a full shilling he would probably still be in Italy. Bottom line is unlike English clubs, Italian clubs like having the top Italian players playing for them.

English clubs in general seem to only prefer English players when either laws are brought in to force them to, or if they have a British manager.

Name some top English players abroad.