Originally posted by gvnrav005@uct:
<strong>Look, while nobody can argue that Keane is a hard individual with very fixe idea's on how things should be and shouldn't be, there are some issues that now come up which , to be honest, bring the game, Keane and his team into a bit of disrepute.
1) What happened in the World Cup? Depending on who you believe, there are differnent versions, one for everyone! I still think that, as captain, Keane should have had a bit more self restraint, even if Mcarthy did what was said, Keanes comments show that HE KNEW that Mcarthy was trying to bait him. A national captain should be willing to hold back, fight another day for the good of his country and team.
2) Look, footy is a contact sport, and yes, people will get hurt, and yes, occasionally the blood will rush to the head and we see a reckless challenge. But never before has a footballer admitted to deliberattely trying to injure a fellow profesional in a bid for revenge. Now, I am sure that nobody woill disagree that the original attempt while Haaland was a Leeds player was wrong, and that although Haaland reacted badly, remember that Keane had just tried to break his leg. Then Keane admits to trying to gain revenge, but revenge from what? Keane is supposed to be a role model, is this really what we want children to view sport as, a chance to gain revenge on someone by breaking their legs?
3) Keane is captain and one of the best paid players at Man Utd. yet he admits to playing hung over and various other incidents like that like they really are nothing. Once again, what kind of an example?
4) Lastly, while he is expected to be honest in his assesment of people who he has played with and for, it would seem that Keane has been a bit selective as to who he critisises and who he doesn't. Now I am the first to say that Footballers, especially captains, should never critisise teamates in print. Butthey should also not be conveniently leaving people out. this is the reason why biographies should be left for when the playing days are over. While Keane is being honest at times, so was Stam and look where it got him.
To end of, Do I think that Keane deserves a life ban? Absoloutely not! However, he should be reprimanded by his club, and at least punished in some way by the FA, if only to demonstrate to youngsters that players are not beyond the law!</strong><hr></blockquote>
I disagree with so much of this I don't know where to start. I'm afraid its mis-informed and ill-judged. In summary my problems with each of your points are as follows:
1. What happened at the WC has been well documented and most people would accept that there is blame to be taken on both sides. I don't see how Keane's relationship with the Ireland can bring Keane and his club into disrepute. If anything, Keane's criticism of McCarthy illustrate just how professionally United prepare for games relative to the FAI.
2. The Haaland tackle was wrong and Keane admits that but you seem to be suggesting that Keane is gloating about that tackle and about his attempted revenge. Have you read the book? Do you know exactly what Keane said about the tackle? Another section of the book details how Keane was so upset at losing his cool with Shearer last year that he questioned his own ability to play for United. So surely this is an indication that this book will be an insight into Keane that we haven't seen before. I haven't read it but the Haaland thing could very well express Keane's remorse for that behaviour. But you don't seem to think so, I don't know how you've come to the conclusions you've come and I don't know where you got the broken legs bit.
3. Yep. He's captain. Yep. He played hung over. And now he's admitting all of that. Sound familiar? Tony Adams anyone? Surely this is further evidence of the book being an attempt to express remorse and regret. And as far as setting examples go, Keane recognised he had a problem with the booze and admits in the book that he has given up drinking. Now that could be a great example to all of us, face your weaknesses and do something about them.
4. He's selective in the people he criticises. Whats wrong with that? Do you want him to criticise everyone? Don't really see the argument here.
Fair play to you for at least writing something on the editorial that you have put a bit of thought into gvnrav005@uct. I deliberately decided to take time out to reply to your post because you didn't just write "Keane is a dick" so something to that effect.
Mark Bain's editorial is great as far as I'm concerned and you should re-read it.