Paul Scholes: concerned that City are moving ahead of United at Youth Level

Gabe

Full Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2001
Messages
2,322
Location
Gold Country
Article from the Independent:

Paul Scholes column: As Manchester United man, I'm worried that Manchester City have moved ahead of the game at youth level

When I was a kid, it was the case among the lads I played football with that if Manchester United wanted to sign you then joining Manchester City was not even a consideration. United did not have to persuade or offer inducements. We would have walked there ourselves.

Thirty years on, and the picture in Manchester is very different and, as a United fan, it worries me. Trying to look at it from a neutral perspective I have to say that what City have achieved is impressive and their impact on the youth scene in Manchester began long before the opening of their City Football Academy this week, an event which seems to have generated more publicity in some quarters than the arrival of Christmas itself.

It has been no secret among people I know in football that City have taken great strides in their youth academy programmes, to the extent that there are even United players past and present who have, or at least once had, sons at City’s academy. That will be difficult for a lot of United fans to get their heads around. I guess when it comes to a parent wanting the right thing for their child, it takes precedence over even the deepest loyalties.

Producing young footballers is a very difficult process. I was part of a group of players who managed to battle our way right through the youth teams and reserves at a club we loved to be very successful in the first team. We know that it does not happen often. Clearly, City feel that if they can produce just a handful of first-team players from their new £200m academy it will have been worth the investment, and surely that is right.

United have won 10 FA Youth Cups, more than any club in the land and eight more than City. Yet the buzz in Manchester is that it is City now who have the better academy programme. That it is City who are getting the better players in the local area. How that has happened, I cannot say definitively but it will come down to more than one factor. Clearly, the offer of a professional contract when a boy turns 17, and the size of that contract can never be ignored.

It is also about the coaching too. I am more in favour of creating footballers who know how to do the jobs they need to do in a game. At City the emphasis has, I am told, been more about teaching kids to play in certain systems. The results of all the age-group teams are not published by the clubs, not below the Under-18s anyway, but I have heard that when the clubs play each other across the age groups, it is City who come out on top.

Some people say that winning is not that important in youth development. I disagree. You learn about being a footballer by playing matches and you learn about winning by winning those games. Playing at United, in the Under-16s and Under-18s, we were expected to win every week. My contemporaries, people like Nicky Butt and Ryan Giggs, were born and bred winners, and that was the way United liked it. Winning games prepared us for the first team, where we were expected to win every time we stepped on the pitch.

It is a nice idea to say to kids “it doesn’t matter about the result”, but when you become a professional you quickly realise that is all that matters. The sooner you get the winning mentality, the better.

United last won the FA Youth Cup, an Under-18s competition, in 2011 and they were beaten by Chelsea, another very strong academy, in the semi-final the following year. City last won it in 2008 and in the last three years have been knocked out in the fifth round, twice by Fulham. What might concern United fans is that in the last two years their team has been eliminated by Burnley and, last season, Huddersfield Town.

The FA Youth Cup is just one way of taking the temperature of a club’s academy. United have a fantastic history in producing players and there will always be boys who will want to come to the club. The issue is whether they are good enough for the first team. Some of the current lads who have been promoted, such as Paddy McNair and Tyler Blackett, have benefited from an injury crisis but will they be there in the long term? James Wilson clearly has a chance of making the grade.

The bigger picture is how City have upped the stakes with their new academy and training complex. United’s Carrington base is a great training ground and academy, but City have just taken theirs to another level. These things matter now. It is a long way from the days when I used to get three buses from my home in north Manchester to the old Cliff training ground in Salford.

It is a subject that I make no excuse for returning to. In those days you were expected to get yourself to training on time. There were no minibuses to ferry you around. None of the mollycoddling. It was sink or swim and I loved it, especially being with my mates all day. It taught me about being a good footballer but also about taking responsibility for myself. I learnt to be streetwise.

But things change and you can take nothing for granted. In the modern era, United, with their history of being the greatest talent producer, have to watch that they do not become second choice in their own city.
 
That article was a while ago.

@hebegebe would be able to provide clear picture about this.

City getting better results at youth level is true although I wouldn't say it's a worry.
 
It's a worry in the sense it'll only get worse now that City have splashed out on that academy.

It's a truly wonderful facility that'll only get more and more appealing if City continue to win titles, which they will.
 
It's a worry in the sense it'll only get worse now that City have splashed out on that academy.

It's a truly wonderful facility that'll only get more and more appealing if City continue to win titles, which they will.

They have always spent a lot of money to their youth setup in the last 6-7 years.It's nothing new although that new academy complex is good for PR.
 
It's all good having this huge academy. Let's see how many will make it to the first team.
 
City tend to focus on developing athletes, whereas United lean a little more toward technically gifted youngsters. From what I've seen, anyway.

The City academy does look amazing, though. Especially at night.
 
It's all good having this huge academy. Let's see how many will make it to the first team.

This, I dont see how a youth academy can be deemed a success without a succesful first team development line, When your talking youth acadamies, your talking us, Arsenal, West Ham, Southampton, Ajax, Barcelona and the rest pale in comparison.

Chelsea and City may be having success in youth leagues, can have all the infrastructure and coaching in place but with no results as of yet, we have already called up more youth players this season to our first team threw need or necessity then both have done in the last 5 years, in the year of 2014 5 academy players made their first team debuts, Januzaj, Wilson, Blackett, McNair and James, with Jesse Lingard and Andreas Peairea on the cusp of the first team, with current academy players Evans, Fletcher and Rafael already in the team also, when City start fielding some of their young talents then we can talk but not for now, there youth projects have been expensive flops so far
 
Depends how city want to use the academy. I tend to believe it will be more on footsteps of Chelsea, with less possibility of good young players joining the first team but more about sending them on loans and then selling for profit those who do well. Not sure it is worrisome or anything though. Our academy is doing equally well and our youngsters are in fact getting chance to break in first team unlike City's.
 
Depends how city want to use the academy. I tend to believe it will be more on footsteps of Chelsea, with less possibility of good young players joining the first team but more about sending them on loans and then selling for profit those who do well. Not sure it is worrisome or anything though. Our academy is doing equally well and our youngsters are in fact getting chance to break in first team unlike City's.
It's not about everybody getting a piece of the pie and us doing more with our piece. Scholes' is poimtt is about us getting a smaller piece. That the best talent might go to city and we lose out. That's not a win scenario.
 
Whether city use their talent to make profit (which they won't) them bagging better talents is already a victory irrespective of what they do with that talent.
 
United last won the FA Youth Cup, an Under-18s competition, in 2011 and they were beaten by Chelsea, another very strong academy, in the semi-final the following year. City last won it in 2008 and in the last three years have been knocked out in the fifth round, twice by Fulham. What might concern United fans is that in the last two years their team has been eliminated by Burnley and, last season, Huddersfield Town.
Doesn't this imply the polar opposite to what the article is talking about? Makes it seem like the decline of United's academy is overstated, and the rise of City's is overstated. Sure, that's just the older kids, but Scholes seems to use it as a key part of his argument even though it doesn't fit with what he's saying... Wouldn't surprise me if the two academies are actually pretty similar in quality overall.
 
I'll wait and see how much of this fantastic academy is real and how much is PR blitz from an extremely rich owner. They've obviously thrown a tonne of money at these new facilities and what was there before, but there are two things to judge them on. Winning, as Scholes says, and academy graduates. So far:

  • They've not had a sniff of a major youth trophy in over 6 years.
  • Under Pellegrini, of all the promising academy talent, there has been a grand total of two who have set foot on a pitch for the 1st team. One of those is now playing in The Championship.

It doesn't matter if they have every new talent under the sun if they're not doing anything with them. We have a good academy and we are seeing our players come through to the first team in significant numbers. We need to stop being quite so concerned with what City are doing all the time.
 
What is concerning for me isn't City's shiny academy. Until their youth products actually get a chance in the first team, I don't really care. I'm concerned that all the best talents in the local area are apparently at their academy and not at United.
 
I'll wait and see how much of this fantastic academy is real and how much is PR blitz from an extremely rich owner. They've obviously thrown a tonne of money at these new facilities and what was there before, but there are two things to judge them on. Winning, as Scholes says, and academy graduates. So far:

  • They've not had a sniff of a major youth trophy in over 6 years.
  • Under Pellegrini, of all the promising academy talent, there has been a grand total of two who have set foot on a pitch for the 1st team. One of those is now playing in The Championship.

It doesn't matter if they have every new talent under the sun if they're not doing anything with them. We have a good academy and we are seeing our players come through to the first team in significant numbers. We need to stop being quite so concerned with what City are doing all the time.
Who are these fellows, out of curiosity?
 
Credit where credit is due. Though I can't stand the idea of City grabbing more kids in Manchester, it may well be true. Scholes raised a few good points there the best of them being parents will look away from loyalty if it means 17 year olds get massive contracts and are brought up in a £200m state of the art academy. They're really pushing for self-sustenance and that's a good way to go for a club.

Yet, Scholes who was brought through and lived through the United ranks seems to have forgotten just what United means to the people in Manchester. It's more than just a club to them. To us. Part of my family is from Manchester and to them it's a symbol of pride, glory and honour. Scholes imagines that just because City have better facilities, they have a better training system. Well it's not what you do with it but how you work it (amirightladies).

Van Gaal has overseen some of the greatest youth development in football history. He bred a glorious generation of Ajax wunderkinds. He tweaked the La Masia system and cherrypicked some of football most memorable names at Barcelona. He goes to Bayern does the same thing and promotes the kind of youth that hold World Cup winner medals! So when he says that he is unconcerned about City and their academy and that he's satisfied with our academy and looking at the standards he imposes in just about anything he does (Training, match days or even interviews!). He's the sort that doesn't stand for any kind of nonsense and I trust him to oversee our great big Red machine.

McNair, Blackett, Wilson and Lingard has been picked from the academy and given the chance to cement their places in United history. Let's see how many City produce 10 years from now.
 
Credit where credit is due. Though I can't stand the idea of City grabbing more kids in Manchester, it may well be true. Scholes raised a few good points there the best of them being parents will look away from loyalty if it means 17 year olds get massive contracts and are brought up in a £200m state of the art academy. They're really pushing for self-sustenance and that's a good way to go for a club.

Yet, Scholes who was brought through and lived through the United ranks seems to have forgotten just what United means to the people in Manchester. It's more than just a club to them. To us. Part of my family is from Manchester and to them it's a symbol of pride, glory and honour. Scholes imagines that just because City have better facilities, they have a better training system. Well it's not what you do with it but how you work it (amirightladies).

Van Gaal has overseen some of the greatest youth development in football history. He bred a glorious generation of Ajax wunderkinds. He tweaked the La Masia system and cherrypicked some of football most memorable names at Barcelona. He goes to Bayern does the same thing and promotes the kind of youth that hold World Cup winner medals! So when he says that he is unconcerned about City and their academy and that he's satisfied with our academy and looking at the standards he imposes in just about anything he does (Training, match days or even interviews!). He's the sort that doesn't stand for any kind of nonsense and I trust him to oversee our great big Red machine.

McNair, Blackett, Wilson and Lingard has been picked from the academy and given the chance to cement their places in United history. Let's see how many City produce 10 years from now.
Investment is not always the deciding factor but there's no guarantee we will "work it" better either. If City have better infrastructure, better facilities and are a more exciting prospect, we'd have to offer far far better levels of coaching or something like La Masia did in relation to others, to match them. Just because we're Manchester United won't cut it I dont think.
 
Investment is not always the deciding factor but there's no guarantee we will "work it" better either. If City have better infrastructure, better facilities and are a more exciting prospect, we'd have to offer far far better levels of coaching or something like La Masia did in relation to others, to match them. Just because we're Manchester United won't cut it I dont think.
Compared to City, we are La Masia don't you think? Regardless of any kind of infrastructure, if there isn't an infrastructure to bring them through and get them playing in the first playing consistently then no amount of gloss can get the kids to come. Chelsea promised a lot when they did something similar with their Academy when Mourinho first arrived and one after the other the kids go away despite showing great promise. Loftus-Cheek is their new exciting prospect and yet, I fear for him.

The thing with bringing players through is that the the entire management infrastructure must be positioned to push players through. United have been fortunate in ahving Sir Alex for this and he ensured that we create a tradition and history of promoting players through. Even if they don't make the first team, our players have gone on to have successful football careers in the Prem and have done for years now.

Look at Stoke, Sunderland and a host of other Championship clubs and you'll find a large number of 'academy products' playing today.

Our infrastructure may not be as shiny as City's at the moment, but our reputation for bringing them through far outclasses City and many others in the land.
 
Compared to City, we are La Masia don't you think? Regardless of any kind of infrastructure, if there isn't an infrastructure to bring them through and get them playing in the first playing consistently then no amount of gloss can get the kids to come. Chelsea promised a lot when they did something similar with their Academy when Mourinho first arrived and one after the other the kids go away despite showing great promise. Loftus-Cheek is their new exciting prospect and yet, I fear for him.

The thing with bringing players through is that the the entire management infrastructure must be positioned to push players through. United have been fortunate in ahving Sir Alex for this and he ensured that we create a tradition and history of promoting players through. Even if they don't make the first team, our players have gone on to have successful football careers in the Prem and have done for years now.

Look at Stoke, Sunderland and a host of other Championship clubs and you'll find a large number of 'academy products' playing today.

Our infrastructure may not be as shiny as City's at the moment, but our reputation for bringing them through far outclasses City and many others in the land.
I don't think their track record of bringing young players through is what we have to worry about right now. That's a long way away. What we have to make sure is that they aren't going to grab the next young future superstar before us. It's completely conceivable that it could happen and we have to guard against it.
 
Most of the times, it's all about luck in getting a very good talent to join you AND later developing into a very good player at senior level. I wouldn't worry.
 
Ahhh, never heard of the first, and forgot about Pozo. Cheers!
And even Pozo is really a Madrid product, he only moved to City 2 years ago. They paid 2.4mil for him.
 
And even Pozo is really a Madrid product, he only moved to City 2 years ago. They paid 2.4mil for him.

Still counted as City's academy graduate although I suspect he will be flogged back to Spain after a few years i.e Denis Suarez.

It is a worry if all the best talents in the area flog to City than united.

That is certainly not true.We have some of the best Manchester talents in the rank.What more worrying is they are luring some of our talents to them by offering ridiculous rewards including contract until 16 so they don't have to worry about being released at 12-15 and world class education plus other financial bonuses.

Investment is not always the deciding factor but there's no guarantee we will "work it" better either. If City have better infrastructure, better facilities and are a more exciting prospect, we'd have to offer far far better levels of coaching or something like La Masia did in relation to others, to match them. Just because we're Manchester United won't cut it I dont think.
 
Last edited:
It is a worry if all the best talents in the area flog to City than united.

Not the case, I have been told by a coach at Utd that the U9's (this is the youngest age group signed into the academy) are the best group they have had for a number of years, a lot of these boys signed even after being approached by City. The U9's & U10's both beat City in November. The main problem the club have is the poaching of its best players in the foundation stage when transfer fees are small by offering promises of private schooling and financial reward. The club are very aware of this and I am positive they will react to stop this happening.

I have posted previously that I have watched every age from U9 to U18 and in my opinion we have some outstanding talent in every single group, additionally we have also just been awarded coach of the year for both our head coaches at foundation and professional stages, so it's not just about the facilities.
 
Not the case, I have been told by a coach at Utd that the U9's (this is the youngest age group signed into the academy) are the best group they have had for a number of years, a lot of these boys signed even after being approached by City. The U9's & U10's both beat City in November. The main problem the club have is the poaching of its best players in the foundation stage when transfer fees are small by offering promises of private schooling and financial reward. The club are very aware of this and I am positive they will react to stop this happening.

I have posted previously that I have watched every age from U9 to U18 and in my opinion we have some outstanding talent in every single group, additionally we have also just been awarded coach of the year for both our head coaches at foundation and professional stages, so it's not just about the facilities.

Good to know. Thanks.
 
I don't think we should be too concerned, lets face it unless City have a truly exceptional player come from their youth system then they'll never see the first team with all the money they spend on players each transfer window.
 
McNair, Blackett, Wilson and Lingard has been picked from the academy and given the chance to cement their places in United history. Let's see how many City produce 10 years from now.

That's a good return considering the level required by United.
 
Three of the above, Blackett, Wilson and Lingard have been with the club since the U9's, this shows we still have a fully functioning academy at every level, from identifying the talent at grass roots to developing players through the age groups, we don't just cherry pick all the best talent at 14 and above, just to be seen to have winning teams.

Utd's Academy does seem to be tailored more to the individual talent than the team, in my opinion this is the correct formula, who cares if your academy teams win at each age group as long as you keep producing a steady stream of players that are Premier League quality.
 
Three of the above, Blackett, Wilson and Lingard have been with the club since the U9's, this shows we still have a fully functioning academy at every level, from identifying the talent at grass roots to developing players through the age groups, we don't just cherry pick all the best talent at 14 and above, just to be seen to have winning teams.

This.Nothing against City's academy and not saying their British talents are not good but I have to scratch my head sometimes looking at the number of foreign imports they have U14s onwards (they seem willing to support every kid's family to move to England so that they can sign them before 16).Every team has some but they really overdid it.

That saying I believe they will have less imports in the future now that they improved the quality of their British core talents.
 
Last edited:
I can remember when City's first team included home grown David White, Brightwell, Redmond, Andy Hinchcliffe, Paul Lake, Paul Moulden; many of whom featured when they beat us 5-1 in the early Ferguson years. Admittedly, with higher standards nowadays, only Lake and perhaps Hinchcliffe, would be contenders for a place in the 2015 first team squad.

For quite a while City were regarded as being far better at youth development than United; that is until Giggs broke into the first team.
 
Last edited:
I don't think we should be too concerned, lets face it unless City have a truly exceptional player come from their youth system then they'll never see the first team with all the money they spend on players each transfer window.
I know they may not find a talent to breach the first team, you could be right, but if they are bring through a few players and selling them on for profit this will help them meet the financial fair play and leave them with a larger budget to splash on the first team.

The main thing we have going in our favour is the name, especially within the younger age groups the thought of playing for Manchester United always seems a bigger draw maybe I'm biased but we have the history and the brand. If you add a top level of coaching to that we should be able to draw players Into the academy.
 
I know they may not find a talent to breach the first team, you could be right, but if they are bring through a few players and selling them on for profit this will help them meet the financial fair play and leave them with a larger budget to splash on the first team.

The main thing we have going in our favour is the name, especially within the younger age groups the thought of playing for Manchester United always seems a bigger draw maybe I'm biased but we have the history and the brand. If you add a top level of coaching to that we should be able to draw players Into the academy.
Not anymore. City have a lot of publicity on their side about their facilities and how they are modelling it on La Masia. Add in the various enticements that are rumoured and it could be that they overtake us.
 
I think United's academy is a bit overrated to be fair.

Investment in youth is supposedly all about producing players for your own team, yet when you look at United, there's only really been John O'Shea/Darren Fletcher/Jonny Evans who have gone on to be Manchester United regulars since the class of 92 and these players are hardly titans of the game.

We've lost talents like Pique/Rossi/Pogba/Shawcross due to them not being given opportunity here, produced (in boat loads) players like Danny Simpson/Phil Bardsley/Tom Cleverley/Kieran Richardson who go on to have careers at lower tier Premier League clubs, sold Danny Welbeck, so what is Manchester United's academy all about, If 99% don't go on to be Manchester United players?

Things appear to be changing under Van Gaal and he is giving youth a chance, but Sir Alex Ferguson's last 10-15 years at the club, it was dreadful and for me United's and Sir Alex motto of 'always giving youth a chance' was a myth as academy players was never given the chance or wasn't deemed good enough under his watch, therefore you have to say Manchester United's academy in the last 23 years has been a failure.
 
Last edited:
I know they may not find a talent to breach the first team, you could be right, but if they are bring through a few players and selling them on for profit this will help them meet the financial fair play and leave them with a larger budget to splash on the first team.
The potential profits of selling a few youth players is minuscule when it comes to FFP. They have sponsors that rake in hundreds of millions a season and like us can just get more sponsors for random shit that will bring in more profits than selling youth players.