Tareq
Livvie's Favourite Jordanian.
It's interesting to know that out of the 101 goals he scored 4 United, Only 23 of them were scored when he came as a sub.
Originally posted by 26 may 1999:
<strong>Put the stat books away...
He was annonymous today.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I say ditch him. Highest bidder come January.
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>
I say ditch him. Highest bidder come January.</strong><hr></blockquote>
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
Originally posted by tareq abd albari:
<strong>Livvie, I knew that u r going to post here , it's strange that n both times he came on as a sub this season against wba & n the cl, he scored, while when he started the othe games he didn't score,,,,,,</strong><hr></blockquote>
Well there's your answer then.
He deserves at least 100 lashes for not scoring against Chelsea as sub. Or Boro.
Originally posted by tareq abd albari:
<strong>btw : is ole a regular starter n norway national side ?</strong><hr></blockquote>
yes... 19 goals in 49 matches or something like that.. ( im not 100% sure about that )
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>Any stattos out there like to let us know the goals per minutes on the pitch?</strong><hr></blockquote>
I think before the season he was on average one goal for every other game or summit like that..
He was annonymous today <hr></blockquote>
Er, I must have seen a different game from you then. At least for the 1st half.
Ever United player was annonymous in the 2nd half!
The tug-back by the Leeds defender in the box wud have resulted in a penalty if it weren't the Liverpool supporter Winters refereeing! ( Ruud was awarded a penalty for a similiar offence committed last week! )
And he was playing more like an advanced midfielder, with beautiful touches & knock-ons & if Ruud had converted just a couple of chances his way, United wud not have lost!
PS - Can Ruud kick further than 6 yards?
Originally posted by pigface:
<strong>
I think before the season he was on average one goal for every other game or summit like that..</strong><hr></blockquote>
Yes, but goals per minutes played?
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>
Yes, but goals per minutes played?</strong><hr></blockquote>
thats far to difficult for me wittle cranium...
Originally posted by pigface:
<strong>
thats far to difficult for me wittle cranium...
</strong><hr></blockquote>
kkcbl will do it.
Originally posted by kkcbl:
<strong>26 may 1999,
And he was playing more like an advanced midfielder, with beautiful touches & knock-ons & if Ruud had converted just a couple of chances his way, United wud not have lost!
PS - Can Ruud kick further than 6 yards?</strong><hr></blockquote>
OGS was our best player in attack last Sat.
his first touch was great, and his link up play with Ruud also good. I'm actually seeing some improvement from the Bolton game. We lost, but we created more chances than them, and their second best chance comes from a misplace pass by Rio.
Now next time I hope Fergie bring Stewart for the next few games, so if Butt got injured again, we atleast have a real CM, not a defender and RM forced to played in CM.
Originally posted by tareq abd albari:
<strong>It's interesting to know that out of the 101 goals he scored 4 United, Only 23 of them were scored when he came as a sub.</strong><hr></blockquote>
"Only", thats almost 1 in 4 which is a lot.
Im an Ole fan but i feel the team would benefit if Forlan was to start the next few.
Originally posted by reelworld:
<strong>
OGS was our best player in attack last Sat.
his first touch was great, and his link up play with Ruud also good. I'm actually seeing some improvement from the Bolton game. We lost, but we created more chances than them, and their second best chance comes from a misplace pass by Rio.
Now next time I hope Fergie bring Stewart for the next few games, so if Butt got injured again, we atleast have a real CM, not a defender and RM forced to played in CM.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Toally agree!
And kkcbl - get your act together and find those stats.