- Joined
- Jun 24, 2013
- Messages
- 2,553
Most punchable face in world football
Only when without the adds on.So 73m then
£100m on Grealish
£60-70m on Haaland
Absolutely sickening. Money money money.
Are you having a bad dayMaybe you should, people have that freedom to worry about different teams.
We think "We have Rashford/Bruno/Shaw.... No need for other player on that position."I forgot they bought Alvarez too. Stupid.
£89M Pogba£100m on Grealish
£60-70m on Haaland
Absolutely sickening. Money money money.
Most punchable face in world football
Exactly. They are lying to our face, ffs375k? No chance
Yes. It will not be reported because it is not united.Is there a signing-on fee? If so, the "wages" are pretty much irrelevant.
We think "We have Rashford/Bruno/Shaw.... No need for other player on that position."
Other top clubs think "We need two players per position"
Remember when we were close to signing Haaland? "Oh, how that will impact on Martial or Rashford"?
"We don't need Sancho. We have Greenwood. "
£89M Pogba
£80M Maguire
£75M Sancho
We’re not shy or splashing the cash when we need to either
Yeah but Sanchez was on a million a week.why do they always conveniently leave out the offshore payments and signing on bonuses which aren’t far off the club fee
There is definitely some money being spent under the table. City have been doing clever accounting ever since they were formed in 2008. How else do you explain the unbroken loyalty of the likes of Aguero, David Silva, Kompany etc? It’ll be the same with Haaland.Yeah, so you can divvy the deal up however you like... signing-on fee, bonuses, wages, fee to his Dad. It certainly doesn't mean he only cost "the release fee plus £375k per week" which is how some will spin it, like City got a bargain.
Problem is why media do it. When we sign player his weekly wage is always quoted with all possible fees. Remember Alexis and his 500k?why do they always conveniently leave out the offshore payments and signing on bonuses which aren’t far off the club fee
Easy to not break the salary cap when the player's offshore accounts get flooded with petro dirhamsLove the “this won’t be breaking our salary cap” briefings from City already
The most inevitable of transfers. He and his dad will absolutely rake it in on this deal.
Agent fees up to £60m apparently. That was the purpose of the clause. So they’d get a big slice of the transfer fee.
Why? With all due resoect to them, they are not giant club. They are level bellow whos policy is; buy cheap, sell expensive.Also let’s not forget the **** role BvB played in all of this. Happy to be friendzoned by Haaland and agreeing to his release fee demands knowing full well he would be poached by another club for peanuts.
Noooo waaaaay?Agent fees up to £60m apparently. That was the purpose of the clause. So they’d get a big slice of the transfer fee.
Also let’s not forget the **** role BvB played in all of this. Happy to be friendzoned by Haaland and agreeing to his release fee demands knowing full well he would be poached by another club for peanuts.
Got to agree on this. He will bully his way on to the scoresheet a fair bit but it will be interesting to see if he has the touch and awareness to adapt to that team. Don’t get me wrong, it won’t be a Lukaku at Chelsea situation but he may not have the devastating effect his reputation might suggest in that team.Also the transition is where he is most dangerous with his pace and direct nature.
They have 70% possession most games.
I don't see why people care about this. It's an excellent business model and why players like Adeyami, Bellingham, Haaland jump at the chance to go to Dortmund. It's always an attacking system, always top 2 in the Bundesliga with dreams of beating Bayern, always compete for the cup, always in the CL, have a great stadium and fanbase, and the players know that if they reach their potential, the club won't make their lives hell to move on. Dortmund get good years from them, make a lot of money, and get the next star up. Occasionally players line up where they can have a serious challenge, but other than that they never call too far.Also let’s not forget the **** role BvB played in all of this. Happy to be friendzoned by Haaland and agreeing to his release fee demands knowing full well he would be poached by another club for peanuts.
FodenMost punchable face in world football
It’s just a bit odd that a CL level club would be willing to sign a supertalent on the basis that they’ll get a couple of seasons out of him and then 100% lose him for very little. It’s more the behaviour of a second tier club, which they probably are to be fair to them.Why? With all due resoect to them, they are not giant club. They are level bellow whos policy is; buy cheap, sell expensive.
They got him, got return in goals and made slight profit. Good business by them
It is only us to blame. We could have bought him too. We refused to put release clause and that is it. Were we right or wrong, it is another topic
Great. They'll score 150 goals next season
It’s exactly the reason why they will never compete with Bayern in any way, shape or form. Their behaviour is that of a club that has accepted that they will always be a B- level club and lose their best players time after time. They have no ambition and hence why Bayern are probably laughing every season.I don't see why people care about this. It's an excellent business model and why players like Adeyami, Bellingham, Haaland jump at the chance to go to Dortmund. It's always an attacking system, always top 2 in the Bundesliga with dreams of beating Bayern, always compete for the cup, always in the CL, have a great stadium and fanbase, and the players know that if they reach their potential, the club won't make their lives hell to move on. Dortmund get good years from them, make a lot of money, and get the next star up. Occasionally players line up where they can have a serious challenge, but other than that they never call too far.