Mo Salah

Grand Vizier said:
I don't know about that, they paid €120m for Griezmann. Real would have made sense, though, would have been brilliant for them and they've needed a right winger for some time. Rodrygo is good, but not at Salah's level.
Click to expand...
But that was the last of Barcelona's money though I believe, Salah had only been at Liverpool a couple of seasons, so he would have cost a fortune.
 
Hammondo said:
He's changed his style, I totally underestimated him. He's adapted to getting older so damn well.
Click to expand...

I think a lot of people did. He always had this passing ability in his locker though, as shown by his assist record (I don't want to open up another playmaker or not debate by saying this...).

His decision making wasn't always the best, which led to claims that he was selfish, but that's probably improved more than anything.
 
DennisReynolds said:
I think a lot of people did. He always had this passing ability in his locker though, as shown by his assist record (I don't want to open up another playmaker or not debate by saying this...).

His decision making wasn't always the best, which led to claims that he was selfish, but that's probably improved more than anything.
Click to expand...
That's true, but he's also conserving himself so well now, and became a more complete player.
 
DennisReynolds said:
I think a lot of people did. He always had this passing ability in his locker though, as shown by his assist record (I don't want to open up another playmaker or not debate by saying this...).

His decision making wasn't always the best, which led to claims that he was selfish, but that's probably improved more than anything.
Click to expand...
I think it’s just a natural process that once you lose the stamina to use your explosiveness every time, you have to pick and choose your moments better, and in between times you play with your head up more and use your other skills. At his peak it made sense to play at full throttle with every move, you’re compelled to be selfish, and your other qualities suffer a little with that narrow focus and playing at that pace. His final ball has always been surprisingly good for someone that played with his head down and always sniffing goals.
 
Hammondo said:
That's true, but he's also conserving himself so well now, and became a more complete player.
Click to expand...

Brwned said:
I think it’s just a natural process that once you lose the stamina to use your explosiveness every time, you have to pick and choose your moments better, and in between times you play with your head up more and use your other skills. At his peak it made sense to play at full throttle with every move, you’re compelled to be selfish, and your other qualities suffer a little with that narrow focus and playing at that pace. His final ball has always been surprisingly good for someone that played with his head down and always sniffing goals.
Click to expand...

Yes both true. I think he's a complete player now. He can't do as many sprints a game as he used to but it doesn't really stop him when he can create so many chances.

I'm not sure if enjoy watching him as a non-Liverpool fan because he's so efficient and clinical. Compared to say Hazard who is nowhere near as productive but better on the eye.
 
At this moment in time, I'd probably put only Henry in front of him, in terms of consistency and ability. Shearer scored more, Ronaldo and Suarez were magical whilst they were in the PL, but I can only think of Henry who could match or better Salah's effectiveness over a number of seasons, and even then, I might be viewing that period of the PL through nostalgic rose-tinted glasses.
 
Pascal Quiff said:
At this moment in time, I'd probably put only Henry in front of him, in terms of consistency and ability. Shearer scored more, Ronaldo and Suarez were magical whilst they were in the PL, but I can only think of Henry who could match or better Salah's effectiveness over a number of seasons, and even then, I might be viewing that period of the PL through nostalgic rose-tinted glasses.
Click to expand...

I'm also a biased Liverpool fan but I fully agree.

No one will ever top Henry but Salah is second for me.
 
Grand Vizier said:
I don't know about that, they paid €120m for Griezmann. Real would have made sense, though, would have been brilliant for them and they've needed a right winger for some time. Rodrygo is good, but not at Salah's level.
Click to expand...
They’ve had to pull a lot of levers since then. They ain’t spending huge amounts any longer. However if Salah is out of contract they’ll be in for him
 
Hopefully him going to afcon will throw off their form.
 
Pascal Quiff said:
At this moment in time, I'd probably put only Henry in front of him, in terms of consistency and ability. Shearer scored more, Ronaldo and Suarez were magical whilst they were in the PL, but I can only think of Henry who could match or better Salah's effectiveness over a number of seasons, and even then, I might be viewing that period of the PL through nostalgic rose-tinted glasses.
Click to expand...
Wouldn’t accuse you of wearing rose tints as he’s certainly up there anyway. He deserves to go down as a Liverpool legend and pulled you lot out of many a pickle. I thought he might of gone to join the oilys for the money but fair play to the lad. No matter what he does with or without a new contract I couldn’t fault him.
 
keithsingleton said:
Wouldn’t accuse you of wearing rose tints as he’s certainly up there anyway. He deserves to go down as a Liverpool legend and pulled you lot out of many a pickle. I thought he might of gone to join the oilys for the money but fair play to the lad. No matter what he does with or without a new contract I couldn’t fault him.
Click to expand...

Honestly he'll be above Henry when it's all said and done. The only downside with Salah when people compare him to other greats is he's not as aesthetic to watch as an Henry, even if he's every bit as effective and consistent.
 
Valencia Shin Crosses said:
Honestly he'll be above Henry when it's all said and done. The only downside with Salah when people compare him to other greats is he's not as aesthetic to watch as an Henry, even if he's every bit as effective and consistent.
Click to expand...
I think the aesthetic part is a bit overplayed tbh.

I think he's better to watch than 42 goal season Ronaldo for example (and was so in the season where he bettered those numbers).

This is a player who scored this goal against city


And has plenty like it in his back catalogue. Yes, Henry, Suarez and Neymar are better to watch but he's got plenty of flair in him.
 
Remember the geese said:
Nope. Ronaldo was breathtaking.
Click to expand...
In the season prior to that. In the 42 goal season he was very much about efficiency. He didn't rediscover his flair and all entertaining round game again until he went to Madrid.
 
B20 said:
In the season prior to that. In the 42 goal season he was very much about efficiency. He didn't rediscover his flair and all entertaining round game again until he went to Madrid.
Click to expand...
No, even in that season where he became an absolute monster, he was far more captivating to watch than Salah. As you would expect in fairness, given the chasm between them in terms of natural talent.
 
Remember the geese said:
I am. I remember it very well. Far more flair, vision and trickery than anything Salah has in his locker. Even some of the goals, as efficient as he was, were works of art. Free kicks galore, little deft flicks that beat the keeper etc.
Click to expand...
Yep. People seem to have short memories.

Three league titles on the bounce and a European Cup (scored in the final).
 
It’s baffling why Liverpool are hesitating to meet his demands. Salah has been nothing short of extraordinary, playing a pivotal role in the club's success over the past few years. Season after season, he delivers consistently, proving his value not just with goals but with his all-around contribution to the team. If I were Salah, I’d find Liverpool's reluctance offensive—he’s earned the right to be rewarded. Even at his age, a player of his calibre isn’t easily replaced, and failing to secure his future could prove to be a huge mistake.
 
Would be a mistake giving him what he wants. He might be pivotal, but for how long? He’s 32.
 
He will be very hard to replace. Guy is never ever injured and constantly produces numbers. That kind of player doesn’t come around often.

We had Ronaldo. Arsenal had Henry. Liverpool have Salah.
 
The jammy bastards will sign some 17 year old for 2 million on 5 grand a week who bangs in 50 league goals a season
 
Ben Doak doing well at Boro so I'm sure he'll get chances at Liverpool next season so they need a transitional type player if they let Salah go e.g late 20s who can help them tick along while Doak comes off the bench. Mind you they might aswell just keep Salah for a few more years.

Guessing the issue is they as a maximum just want to give out a two year deal and he wants another three years.
 
Walters_19_MuFc said:
I understand, and that’s why I’m asking: if Saka—arguably one of the best wingers in the world—can’t match Salah’s goal-scoring prowess, then who can?
Click to expand...
Bryan Mbeumo?

Surprisingly only 25, same age as Salah when he joined Liverpool. His goal output has improved year on year, currently on 8 in 12 this season.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.