26 may 1999
Striker
WORK PERMIT REFUSED!
Heh heh heh...
Heh heh heh...
Originally posted by MW16:
<strong>What a shame
Looks like they'll just be relying on Heskey next time St Micks hammy goes ping</strong><hr></blockquote>
Can you read, we're expecting the Baros appeal to be successful,
Originally posted by Red Tide:
<strong>
Can you read, we're expecting the Baros appeal to be successful,</strong><hr></blockquote>
Yes but I suppose they were expecting it to be successful the first time to. <img src="graemlins/nervous.gif" border="0" alt="[Nervous]" />
Originally posted by MW16:
<strong>
Yes but I suppose they were expecting it to be successful the first time to. <img src="graemlins/nervous.gif" border="0" alt="[Nervous]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Moron you have'nt read the article have you, Parry expected it to be rejected (as i've put in bold in the above article)as did John Gregory when he bought Balaban. When you first apply for a permit the Department of Employment just look at the quota of games and reject it if it is'nt 75% (Baros was 40% so Parry expected it to be rejected).
In an appeal a board made up of football bodies (FA, Premier League)listen to what the club has to say, and the clubs almost alawsy get a permit on thier appeal which we are confident we will do.
Originally posted by Red Tide:
<strong>
Moron you have'nt read the article have you, Parry expected it to be rejected (as i've put in bold in the above article)as did John Gregory when he bought Balaban. When you first apply for a permit the Department of Employment just look at the quota of games and reject it if it is'nt 75% (Baros was 40% so Parry expected it to be rejected).
In an appeal a board made up of football bodies (FA, Premier League)listen to what the club has to say, and the clubs almost alawsy get a permit on thier appeal which we are confident we will do.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Why would they bid for him if they did'nt think they'd get him <img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" />
And if your clever little story is true then why did'nt they keep Fowler until the baros guy was confirmed
Originally posted by MW16:
<strong>
Why would they bid for him if they did'nt think they'd get him <img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" />
And if your clever little story is true then why did'nt they keep Fowler until the baros guy was confirmed</strong><hr></blockquote>
That story is from the official site go and see for yourself if you don't believe me (http://www.liverpoolfc.tv) and this is'nt new this has happened to the likes of Viduka, Balaban and Tugay.
We bought Baros in August (long before Fowler left) his registration papers belong to Liverpool but we loaned him straight back to his old club due to the fact he would not be able to play for us (for permit reasons). Baros is'nt Fowlers replacement BTW he was bought in to back up Heskey, we'll be signing another striker (other than Baros) either during the Champions League transfer window or at the end of the season.