McClair senior on the Academy

oskarutd

Full Member
Joined
May 25, 2004
Messages
2,161
Location
Norway
Man United claim English football youth system must change to better next generation
Amid the chatter of fans excited by the clatter of studs emerging from dressing rooms again, another sound can be heard.


By Henry Winter, Football Correspondent
Last Updated: 1:21AM BST 09 Aug 2008
Old school: Phil and Gary Neville were brought through from the youth side at Manchester United Photo: EPA

It is the lament about England in crisis, about the dearth of good youngsters. Manchester United disagree.

"We could put a B team in the Championship and they would do well,'' argued Brian McClair, United's academy director.

The European champions this week hosted the Nike Premier Cup, a competition for the world's leading under-15s, and there could be no doubting the potential of some of the English ball-players in the United team, particularly in central midfield during a 4-1 thrashing of Juventus. "We drew with Real Madrid, drew with Paris St-Germain and have players who could play in the Fluminense team [the overall winners],'' McClair added. "They're not better than our best players. They just have more of them.''

Such sentiments about the "quantity of quality'' in foreign ranks echo the views of Fabio Capello. England's coach has hailed significant talents like United's Rio Ferdinand, Wayne Rooney and Owen Hargreaves (and how he would love Paul Scholes back in the fold) but bemoaned the lack of numbers. England would build around Cesc Fabregas; Spain began him on the bench for much of Euro 2008.

In the wake of a fallow summer for England, and the possibility of quotas, the Football Association are under pressure to improve the flow of youth development through the much criticised academies.

Sir Alex Ferguson believes United's under-15s "definitely'' learned more from this week's exposure to Madrid, PSG, Fluminense and Juventus then in any academy tussle with English rivals.

"I watch academy games and I see humdrum stuff all the time,'' Ferguson observed. "I don't see anything exciting or exceptional. It's always nice to see technical players like here [in the Premier Cup].''

Many academies are suspicious of United, fearing their leading schoolboy lights will be lured to Old Trafford, and McClair remarked that "one club close to here haven't played their best [youth] player against us for three years''.

Yet paranoia among opponents and at Soho Square sadly prevents football adopting many of the excellent principles being applied at McClair's academy. His younger age-groups play four-v-four, small-sided games which place an emphasis on technique and intelligent movement. "It's to do with more touches,'' McClair said. "Nobody has played us at four-v-four for years.''

As for the FA's "Respect'' campaign which kicks in this weekend, McClair shrugged. "We've had that for a long time,'' he said. "We don't accept any bad behaviour. In our academy games, if anybody turns round and says anything to the ref or linesmen, we take them off. Sometimes we play with 10 men, so everybody understands.

"In this tournament, we have refs from all over the world. That gives the players experience that, if they get into the big show with the first team and play in the semi-final of the Champions League, away in Italy with a French referee, he might send you off, which could cost the club the chance to play in a Champions League final.''

McClair's brow furrows most at mention of the new Youth Management Group, the multi-party body charged with restarting the conveyor-belt of young talent.

"It's ridiculous having a 10-man committee – and the majority are administrators. There are people from the FA, Football League and Premier League talking about football – they should be technical people. And they don't get on. The Football League and Premier League can't agree on anything. There are so many vested interests. The boys are stuck in the system.''

To liberate the boys, help themselves and assist England, United want a freer hand in recruiting the best schoolboys, recreating a hothouse atmosphere akin to when the "you'll win nothing with kids'' generation of Scholes, David Beckham, Nicky Butt and the Nevilles burst through.

"There was scouting all over Britain, so we got the best players nationally,'' McClair noted. "There was Robbie Savage, Chris Casper and Keith Gillespie in that group as well. When you have the best boys, they challenge each other.

"It's easier and more financially viable now to take a boy from Italy or Spain [because of academy restrictions].

"Fluminense can scout all over Brazil but we're restricted for an hour from here. We still find one or two excellent boys within an hour's travel but I'd like that rule to go. The best English boy could be anywhere.''

If the rule doesn't go, United want to build a boarding school attached to their academy. "That would be ideal,'' McClair said.

While advocating a system that delays schoolboys committing to clubs "until they are 14'', McClair also wants a more equitable compensation method for prospects who move from the club that has nurtured them. Citing John Bostock's controversial transfer from Crystal Palace to Tottenham, McClair said: "Nobody explains how they [the tribunal] get the figures: £750,000 up front is hefty for a 16-year-old, but £1.3 million if he becomes a first-team player at Tottenham isn't.''

Being a promising youngster is one thing, but making the first team in the foreigner-filled, high-stakes Premier League world is another thing altogether.

"I played with the Beckham generation in the reserves, and yes we could see they were talented, but it was about them getting the opportunity,'' McClair recalled.

"Sparky [Mark Hughes], [Paul] Parker and [Andrei] Kanchelskis went, Robbo [Bryan Robson] was near the end, so Beckham, Butt and Gary Neville all took their chance.

"The system is different now. The demands are much greater because we won the Champions League and Premier League last year.''

McClair's Academy aim to get one graduate every other season into Ferguson's first team – "that would be great, if [it was] a local boy we'd be delighted".

It's about opportunity as well as ability. No wonder United want to put out a B team in the Championship to develop their youngsters further.

link.
 
Good article. I personally enjoy seeing good homegrown youngsters coming through rather than expensive foreign players
 
The sooner they get rid of the 60 minute rule the better.
 
The sooner they get rid of the 60 minute rule the better.

That would require the FA to admit they were wrong. That is not likely and will take another decade and more qualifications for major tournaments missed before they do anything. Then they will actually try to restrict the number of foreign players in the first team. I don't hold out much hope for England.
 
This article is from last October, but mentions United is working on a boarding facility that would allow them to develop players outside the 90 minute catchment area.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...-League-plan-for-elite-boarders-Football.html

Premier League plan for elite boarders
The construction of six £25 million boarding schools, stocked exclusively with the best 11- to 16-year-old footballers in the country, is being planned by the Premier League in a move that will revolutionise academy football.

By Henry Winter
08 Oct 2008

The construction of six £25 million boarding schools, stocked exclusively with the best 11- to 16-year-old footballers in the country, is being planned by the Premier League in a move that will revolutionise academy football. It will also alarm many Football League clubs and may damage the Football Association’s proposed National Football Centre at Burton.

Manchester United are already considering building their own boarding school, but the Premier League proposal will have the main star pupils of all 20 elite clubs stationed at educational establishments in the North-East, the Midlands and two centres each in the North-West and London.

The scheme will allow Premier League clubs access to the most promising youngsters currently outside their reach because of the Football Association’s controversial 90-minute rule. The rule was designed to stop schoolboys spending most of their evenings travelling to and from clubs after school. It is also aimed at protecting smaller clubs from losing the talent on their doorstep to distant, but more attractive clubs.

The rule has been a source of constant frustration to directors of leading Premier League academies, some of whom have turned to overseas talent like Spain’s Cesc Fabregas at Arsenal because of the restrictions on them domestically.

United’s manager, Sir Alex Ferguson, has constantly voiced his desire for his club’s high-class cadre of youth-team coaches to work with starlets from across England, not just from within 90 minutes of Old Trafford. The champions argue that it makes more sense for them, and also in the long run for England, if tyros come under their enlightened wing earlier.

Under the Premier League plan, the most gifted 11-year-olds would be invited by a club to attend one of these six hot-house footballing centres where they would work towards GCSEs but spend part of the curriculum nurturing their technique under Uefa Pro-licensed coaches. Aged 16, they would then sign forms with their parent clubs or be released.

In the Football League, some of Watford’s players currently attend school at the specialist Harefield Academy, mixing French lessons with shooting sessions, though it is non-residential.

The complexities of running six boarding schools, from finding suitable sites to recruiting teaching staff, has yet to be sorted out but the buildings would be funded by money generated from the next domestic television deal, which is expected to exceed the current £1.7 billion.

If BT Vision or ESPN join Setanta and Sky in chasing the coveted Sunday 4pm slot, a bidding war could easily produce the additional £150 million required for the six schools. The Premier League would also fund running costs by charging clubs an annual boarding fee of around £25,000 per pupil.

For all the obvious attractions of these Premier League boarding schools, notably the quality of the coaching, the more “contact time’’ with young footballers and the reality that schoolboys will not be involved in exhausting car journeys three nights a week, there are inevitable concerns.

Many children might not wish to leave home at the age of 11, nor might many parents be willing to part with their offspring so young, though the level of teaching will undoubtedly echo the Premier League’s commitment to excellence. Those who do not want to board will simply continue training with their own academies.

The circumvention of the 90-minute rule will cause immediate concern among many Football League clubs who have relied on selling home-grown youngsters to survive. The scouting networks of the elite clubs are so sophisticated that they will have already spotted nascent talent outside their current 90-minute area.

Aston Villa controversially brought in Hastings-born Gareth Barry from Brighton & Hove Albion aged 17, whereas the boarding school system would allow them to lure a similar talent at 11. Brighton were extremely unhappy at the Tribunal-decided fee for Barry and their mood would darken further if their best kids are plucked away at an even younger age.

Such are the myriad sensitivities over player-development that the Premier League face some awkward talks with the Football League,

though there is the chance that prominent clubs outside the elite division will be included in the boarding school set-up. The Premier League plan does, however, allow relegated clubs to keep their pupils in the boarding system.

If the Football League are worried about the impact on their youth development structure, the FA will also be alarmed by the potential damage to their proposed £80 million National Football Centre at Burton. If the Premier League’s six boarding schools offer the best footballing education to the nation’s young pretenders then Burton’s raison d’etre may be questioned.

In any case, one thing is sure: the Premier League plan is sure to stir up controversy.

Going for a Burton

The proposed National Football Centre in Burton has been a political football for almost a decade. The £80 million project, modelled on the French academy in Clairefontaine, was launched in 2001, but the FA put it on hold in 2003 as the Wembley Stadium redevelopment ran into trouble.

A scaled-down version was announced in 2005, but last December the Government said Burton was just one of the sites being considered. In May, the FA decided Burton was the way forward and suggested it would be ready by 2010.