Leeds and money...

tj77

Guest
Debt: £105 million
Accounts receivable : Approx £10 million

Wealthy club, ehh?

Liverpool got a debt of £34 million and got £40 million plus in cash (including the sale of Fowler and the loan from GM.
 
So they're taking out loans in order to give the appearance that they're not in the hole. What's the sense in that ?
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>So they're taking out loans in order to give the appearance that they're not in the hole. What's the sense in that ?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Liverpool will of course use the money. I don't have any insider knowledge, so obviously I do not know how the money will be spent. My guess would be a couple of quality signings.

My point was that financially Liverpool are in a much better position than Leeds! Of course Liverpool can't really compete with Manchester U (although Liverpool have more money and less debt at the moment, United make a huge profit each season and can afford the debt - and United have also invested a lot of money in recent years) financially, but compared to any other english club Liverpool will come out on top.
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Jens:
<strong>where did you hear those figures?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Good question Jens....and if they are true tj or Aritro will gladly provide links so we can all read the facts :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by marchingontogether:
<strong>

Good question Jens....and if they are true tj or Aritro will gladly provide links so we can all read the facts :rolleyes: </strong><hr></blockquote>

I've read them on here, as well as another forum.
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Aritro:
<strong>

I've read them on here, as well as another forum.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Oh well then it's bound to be true then...NOT!

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by tj77:
<strong>

Liverpool will of course use the money. I don't have any insider knowledge, so obviously I do not know how the money will be spent. My guess would be a couple of quality signings.

My point was that financially Liverpool are in a much better position than Leeds! Of course Liverpool can't really compete with Manchester U (although Liverpool have more money and less debt at the moment, United make a huge profit each season and can afford the debt - and United have also invested a lot of money in recent years) financially, but compared to any other english club Liverpool will come out on top.</strong><hr></blockquote>


Liverpool are privately funded and those funds are nearly unlimited. Without PLC shareholders to satisfy, all the money can be pumped back into the team and the club.
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Andy @ Allerton:
<strong>


Liverpool are privately funded and those funds are nearly unlimited. Without PLC shareholders to satisfy, all the money can be pumped back into the team and the club.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Unlimited? <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />

Oh really? Then why don't we see a Rivaldo, a Veron or a Shevchenko stepping into unfilled?

Clueless lying dipper!

<img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" />
Click to expand...
 
Low interest loans ehh. Maybe a second mortgage on Anfield might provide the type of funds to buy a world class player or two. Check out ditech.com they have some good deals :D
 
Originally posted by Andy @ Allerton:
<strong>


Liverpool are privately funded and those funds are nearly unlimited. Without PLC shareholders to satisfy, all the money can be pumped back into the team and the club.</strong><hr></blockquote>


<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> Bitter of Allerton = Businessman of the Year <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by marchingontogether:
<strong>

Oh well then it's bound to be true then...NOT!

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />

Never said they were true(think they're a tad dodgy meself), just telling you where I've seen them. ;)
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Andy @ Allerton:
<strong>


Liverpool are privately funded and those funds are nearly unlimited. Without PLC shareholders to satisfy, all the money can be pumped back into the team and the club.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Don't we wish that were true mate. ;)
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Andy @ Allerton:
<strong>


Liverpool are privately funded and those funds are nearly unlimited. Without PLC shareholders to satisfy, all the money can be pumped back into the team and the club.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Maybe LFC can lower the price of the tickets, so that Unfilled becomes Filled... and perhaps... and I mean this can not happen overnight of course... LFC can stop charging its fans for live radio commentary.

It's fecking disgraceful the way LFC fleeces its fans. It's fecking stupid of you mentioning PLC. I wouldn't if I was a pool fan.
Click to expand...
 
True, but something has to be done to fund a web-site of that quality.
 
Liverpool are privately funded and those funds are nearly unlimited. Without PLC shareholders to satisfy, all the money can be pumped back into the team and the club.


--------------------------------------------------
Yeah, like always happens! Is Anelka e.g. a deal based on his temperement or is it, maybe, that they can't afford to buy him and are hoping for a trophy by the summer in order to obtain the funds to do so? The dippers shortage of a creative midfielder has been obvious for some time. Why havn't they bought one? Why keep floggin' McCallister? They simply havn't got the money!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.