UnitedSofa
You'll Never Walk Away
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2013
- Messages
- 7,454
For sure. I'm far from an expert, but was pretty pleased with the punt on Zirkzee. Looked a handy player, if very unorthodox. Decent price and YPOTY in Italy I think? Obviously it's been a car crash but I like that kind of gamble at the right price.Acting quickly is good but if you're making mistakes regularly, the initial judgement is where the issue lies.
Shame that it won't work but we are lucky that Italy still see him as that younger player of the year from last season. Let's get the funds.
Won’t be a loss until he’s actually transferred though will it? You can book a loss of a loaned player?It'll be a wage saving, but there won't be any funds, it will be a loss on the books.
Our squad is gutted as it is and no players coming in the winter unless we sell. See no reason to loan him out.
If we could somehow get Osimhen in return from Napoli...
Haven't read anywhere that they're interested but that'd be nice. How much money on top of Zirkzee and Rashford to get Kvara and Osimhen...I think Rashford goes to Napoli in a swap deal. Napoli want him, and Rashford already knows McTominay and Lukaku which surely makes them the front runner for a move abroad.
It’s Conte, he loves a United rejectHaven't read anywhere that they're interested but that'd be nice. How much money on top of Zirkzee and Rashford to get Kvara and Osimhen...
Maybe we just needed conte all along to get the best out of this squad full of rejects.It’s Conte, he loves a United reject
We need a donkey tamer, if there is such a thing.Maybe we just needed conte all along to get the best out of this squad full of rejects.
AgreedIf you can move him on now for a similar fee to what we paid then pull the trigger.
This is exactly the sort of sale we never make and the players career festers until they leave in 4 years for nothing having done nothing in their time here. Donny Van De Beek, Mason Mount come to mind
Thanks United!If I'm reading this right it's not an "option" but an obligation IF Juve make the CL. Currently off by a few points because they are a drawing machine.
Makes sense that we could possibly get our money back if he turns those draws into wins, while we would most likely take a hit if we want him bought and off the books now.
This.If you can move him on now for a similar fee to what we paid then pull the trigger.
This is exactly the sort of sale we never make and the players career festers until they leave in 4 years for nothing having done nothing in their time here. Donny Van De Beek, Mason Mount come to mind
If we could somehow get Osimhen in return from Napoli...
A Zirkzee-Osimhen loan swap with an option to buy in the summer would be great
I just don't understand how the higher ups thought we needed a "9.5" instead of a full number 9. Which part of our game last season really suggested that we need someone like that as the final piece of the puzzle?How do we keep getting it so wrong with these signings?
Won’t be a loss until he’s actually transferred though will it? You can book a loss of a loaned player?
To start with, targeting players with zero pace and athleticism and/or lack of height/ability in the airHow do we keep getting it so wrong with these signings?
I think it’s the culture and environment. Put him in United 2012 and he probably takes over from Berbatov. Put Chicarito in our current team and his confidence is through the floor after 10 games.How do we keep getting it so wrong with these signings?
Yeah, but we found a way to cut Weghorst's loan in Turkey short (paying off Besiktas I think), so we could technically be able to pay off Galatasaray and Napoli to get Osimhen. If it's remotely possible, we have to do itWhat’s the situation with Osimhen? Isn’t he on loan to Galatasaray until the summer?
Yeah, but we found a way to cut Weghorst's loan in Turkey short (paying off Besiktas I think), so we could technically be able to pay off Galatasaray and Napoli to get Osimhen. If it's remotely possible, we have to do it
Ashworth?Whoever sanctioned the deal has no idea how to build a team.
well thank goodness he's gone nowAshworth?
He's actually had some good appearances off the bench as well, even quite recently. But other than one or two of his early games, I think he's been shocking in literally every single match he's started.I'm sure he's a bit slow for the premier league, but the difference between him and Bologna and him at United is just shocking. It's not just him being slow, he just misplaces passes across 3 yards.
His first few games for United he still showed some siky touches and holdup play. Now he just looks like a worse Weghorst.
Think he's done at United after last night for sure though.
If we were going all-in on Rashford and Garnacho playing as our inverted wingers, a false nine to bring them into play isn't necessarily a bad idea. Having those two and Hojlund was always a badly balanced attack as you generally need at least one of the three to be a bit more of a creator. I'm guessing that was the thinking on his signing.I just don't understand how the higher ups thought we needed a "9.5" instead of a full number 9. Which part of our game last season really suggested that we need someone like that as the final piece of the puzzle?
Likewise Mason Mount. After watching Kagawa, Mata and Van de Beek struggle to impose themselves on the team, who thought it was a great idea to try this same type of player for a 4th time? And for 60 million!
I just do not fecking get it.
ThisWe really should not agree to a loan unless it’s an obligation to buy
I get the notion but I’m sure even they wouldn’t be able to turn the likes of Antony and Zirkzee around….though that being said, they create a lot of chances and have one of the GOAT PL attackers and a highly functioning team who’s even able to accommodate Darwin at times….so you could be onto something with Zirkzee.You say that but if Liverpool had signed him he would have no doubt fit like a glove. Always the way.
United have a history of signing players cause they could.I just don't understand how the higher ups thought we needed a "9.5" instead of a full number 9. Which part of our game last season really suggested that we need someone like that as the final piece of the puzzle?
Likewise Mason Mount. After watching Kagawa, Mata and Van de Beek struggle to impose themselves on the team, who thought it was a great idea to try this same type of player for a 4th time? And for 60 million!
I just do not fecking get it.