John Lennon vs Paul McCartney

032Devil

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2004
Messages
22,147
Lennon - brilliant!

McCartney - Nowhere as good!


Just listening to "Lennon Legends" (greatest hits) and it's overall great: 'Imagine', 'Jealous guy', 'Power to the people', ''(Just like) starting over', 'Happy Xmas (war is over)', 'Give peace a chance' and many more great hits.

Contrast that with McCartney: 'Band on the run', 'Silly love songs', 'Live and let die', 'Jet', 'Mull of Kintyre'.

Couple of good songs by McCartney but Lennon was superior. And he was getting better and better before he was cruelly gunned down by a pycho-killer.
 
Lennon gave us "Imagine"

Mcartney gave us the "frog chorus"...


Hehe... True!


Or put it another way: Lennon gave us Yoko Ono and McCartney gave us a one-legged whore that is Heather Mills.
 
Imagine is a scouse maudling shocker of a song....:boring:


.....the frog chorus,however.........

videoclip.gif
 
Infact, you've just reminded me to put Yoko Ono on my list of hated people.

Top 5 (at the moment)

Lorraine Kelly
Bono
Yoko Ono
Jamie Oliver
Martin Keown
 
Infact, you've just reminded me to put Yoko Ono on my list of hated people.

Top 5 (at the moment)

Lorraine Kelly
Bono
Yoko Ono
Jamie Oliver
Martin Keown



That's a good list there MUM, but have some respect now for Oliver with the whole school dinners thing.
 
On topic......

Great as a partnership, both fairly average as solo artists.

If I had to pick one it would be Lennon, McCartney is a prick.
 
Contrast that with McCartney: 'Band on the run', 'Silly love songs', 'Live and let die', 'Jet', 'Mull of Kintyre'.

.

Which contains the line:

"And in this ever changing world in which we live in"

That's always annoyed me that.
 
Guns and Roses version was better anyway.
 
On topic......

Great as a partnership, both fairly average as solo artists.

If I had to pick one it would be Lennon, McCartney is a prick.

I agree with you on the first part but prefer McCartney.......

Lennon did my head in................pompous twat.
 
Lennon's music at least had some malice and angst about it (jealous guy, instant karma)

McCartney on he's own just produces bland and inoffensive music. And he got cuckolded by a women with one leg.........the shame............
 
Lennon's music at least had some malice and angst about it (jealous guy, instant karma)

McCartney on he's own just produces bland and inoffensive music. And he got cuckolded by a women with one leg.........the shame............

Lennon was up his own arse most of the time.
I prefer bland to angsty scouser full of malice.
 
Mccartney's a better song writer in my opinion

but Lennon was cooler so most people prefer him



I do hope you are not including the Wings in that analysis.
 
You've obviously never heard any "Wings" (not The Wings),

Band On The Run, Live and Let Die, Jet, Silly love songs, My Love, Mull of Kintyre ?



You obviously didn't notice the lower case "t" in the "the" then did you?

And yes I have heard them (unfortunately) and baring Live and Let Die they are one of the worst bands in the history of music.

IMO of course.
 
bit extreme, worst bands in the history of music?

What are the best bands in your opinion?



IMO..........

Top three in no particular order:-

Pink Floyd.

Radiohead.

The Doors.
 
without mccartney you wouldnt have even heard of lennon, and vice versa.

one without the others influence wasnt as good as when they worked together.

Imagine is a pile of old balls by the way...Maybe im Amazed is much better for example.