No
They are two different words.
Folkmord... Means genocide
Självförsvar.. Means self defense.
Israel - Palestine Discussion
- Thread starter esmufc07
- Start date
-
Nik (@Rood) and Imran (@Annihilate Now!) discuss United's fantastic win away against Athletic Club in the semi-final of the Europa League.
They also pick out the positives of United's 4-3 loss away at Brentford, and Nik reviews a day out at Old Trafford watching Manchester United Women qualify for the Champions League.
They are two different words.
Folkmord... Means genocide
Självförsvar.. Means self defense.
Sikhs can't.
Imagine at this point still pretending this is not genocide.
It would be a great argument if zionists wanted to determine the borders of said state. But they don't because it allows them to deny palestinians rights to a state.
despite being the only country in the Middle East to offer the Palestinians a state. 7x times. All rejected
I kinda miss fearless, at least he was more honest.
Can you remind the terms of said offers?
False, and you still did not answer my question I asked you 3 months ago, where is the command center under alshifa hospital?
Just imagine what they HAVEN'T documented. Scary though that is.
I don't know. I'm not the IDF.
Better than any offer they would get now or likely ever get. A missed opportunity
I don’t have to pretend anything. There is ICJ rulling on the other hand you pretend doesnt exist.
This.
The ICJ did not rule that Israel is not committing a genocide.
Yeah, and OJ is innocent I guess.
Your guesses are irrelevant. Thats not how court of law works.
Technically you are right. The same applies Vice versa.
However there is a reason why it didnt rule in favor of ceasefire proposition.
I guess discussing semantics is all you have left. If I was supporting genocide I'd also clutch to all available straws.
This is an incredible strategy.
They were never going to rule either way. It will take years for them to reach a conclusion on the matter of genocide, and even then I wouldn't need the ICJ to tell me.
Is this bluemoon?
If you have a problem with the rule of law concept, be my guest.
Repeating the same lies again and again only makes you look insecure. But please continue, hand out accusations, you the jury.
You didn't answer. Is it because you don't know what the actual offers are or is it because the offers are close to shameful?
Do you think that any accord that includes executive powers being given(remaining) to IDF in a foreign territory including the control of water and power infrastructures but also settlements remaining in your country while giving unilateral policing powers to IDF when it comes to israelis and settlements that are in your country, is an acceptable accord?
Something like the Oslo Accord is disgraceful, the fact that people are championing it is shameful. As an example this is what the (not actual) withdrawal of IDF was legally planned, only a fool would agree to this:
In other word the legal plan was for IDF to not withdraw but also keep policing and border powers. The other thing is that the things IDF would give up were education and culture, health, social welfare, direct taxation and tourism. As you can see it didn't include things like power and water infrastructures, it doesn't actually include policing(of palestinians) or industries those were supposed to be negotiated by future committees and that was only true for palestinian territories, palestinian would obviously have no say on how and whom should manage Israeli territories.
And there is a reason it will take years. Think about why.
Of course, you are entitled to your opinion to think whatever you want. But to use it in discussion as you are the judge, this is the truth and nothing else…and who has different opinion…you label him genocide supporter. That is just wrong. (This is not aimed at you personally, I dont remember if you did so).
Of course. I also don't really think the genocide label is all-important. It's not like the ICJ will come back in three years and say "No genocide", and everyone will go "Alright, fair enough. Let's move on". The important thing is that Israel is clearly (in my opinion) killing indiscriminately and exhibiting absolutely abhorrent, despicable, disgusting behavior, and they are backing it up with their vile rhetoric. The evidence is sadly plentiful. They are also lying and propagandizing publicly. Just earlier today I saw an interview, where Netanyahu said that the Hamas fighter to civilian death ratio was 1:1. Absolute horseshit. Meanwhile the US and European nations are either supporting it or looking on impotently.
The ruling on a cease-fire is unlikely as the initiation of the conflict falls within Israel's rights. However, the conduct of the war is another question and under investigation.
Comparisons of this situation to Russia's are not accurate; Russia invaded a sovereign country without provocation. (Not saying you are comparing it to it, but many are)
There is no ruling, the case is ongoing. Do you guys not know that, or are you lying?
Did you miss the following posts, or are you just lying?
No, I didn't miss the following posts, I know that you said it's "technically right" that it hasn't been a ruling, which is a weird way to say that there hasn't been a ruling.
You said that there is an ICJ ruling, which is wrong. Did you think that at the time, and attempt to correct yourself later, or did you know there had been no ruling when you said it had?
The ICJ said, in the interim ruling, that the genocide case is plausible. That is why it's continuing, rather than being thrown out. They did not rule on the matter, which is why the case is going on as planned.
The most important provisional measure was not granted. Why?
Yet all you do is defend the indiscriminate murder of civilians and find new, inventive ways to accuse critics of Israel of being anti-semites.
I agree one should be careful not to fall into the trap of suggesting Jews rund the world, but @Bosnian_fan specifically avoided that by referring to Zionists, who famously don't have to be Jewish. Or is Joe Biden not a huge Zionist? Are the majority of Democrats and Republicans not Zionists? Are the majority of Labour and Tory politicians not Zionists? Have the big media outlets in the West (BBC, CNN, NYT, WaPo etc) not been pushing a narrative that favors Israel, effectively a Zionist narrative?
That's in Lebanon, the zionist terrorism doesn't stop.
What a deflection, almost like you've practiced! If they didn't think the case had merit, they had the opportunity to throw it out. They didn't.
You also tried to use the fact that the court case is going to take years to insinuate what the decision will be. I know that you think Serbia committed genocide. Bosnia and Herzegovina took their case to the ICJ in 1993. In 1996 they decided that they had jurisdiction, and they ruled it a genocide in 2007.
How on earth have you ended up as someone lying about the ICJ, someone claiming that OJ Simpson is innocent, and by accident sowing doubts about the Bosnian genocide? You're so bad at this.
Worth a watch.
You are not worth the effort if your conclusion is someone claimed OJ is innocent. Or completely missed the point why ICJ rulling take years. Or completely deflected Simple question About provisional measure. Or make your points without petty personal remarks.
You did, by suggesting a ruling from a court is all that matters. We all know he did it, yet he was walked free. So using your logic he must be innocent.
You can use all the deflections you want but everyone and their dog know it's only a matter a time before this is officially and widely considered a genocide. You and israel are just hoping that happens after the genocide is actually complete and they get all the land they want.