Idxomer
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2014
- Messages
- 16,916
The "both" crowd is the worst.
The language used is what I’m finding the most infuriating.
The UN Human Rights chief said an attack on Rafah would be ‘terrifying’. How about as human rights chief, you actually come out and say it’d be a crime against humanity to bomb Rafah and kill civilians. Why not say that? Insteadthey just cower and watch meekly tutting loudly in the background.
Lord Cameron, British foreign minister says they should ‘stop and think seriously’, like it’s a child away to throw a stone through a window.
Nobody has the balls to call this what it is in the West, that’s what’s so fecking abhorrent about this.
It's exactly what it is. Useless parents that have been indulging their little prat for decades. The prat hasn't grown up, it hasn't learned any decency or respect for anything.
The both sides crowd are the most annoying but it does leave some hope they could change their minds. A lot of people will still have no idea what’s going on in Gaza.The "both" crowd is the worst.
The both sides crowd are the most annoying but it does leave some hope they could change their minds. A lot of people will still have no idea what’s going on in Gaza.
Anyone picking Israel is a lost cause.
I definitely know what you mean. It’s very annoying to hear.The bothsidesism annoys me to no end but yeah I wasn't serious about them being the worst.
Is there another source?
Yes he himself said it. He was talking here about the prophecy of building the third temple, which imply the destruction of the Aqsa mosque.
Found this interesting:
And they still don't want to take their toys away.
Biden can say what he's like, but he's too pathetic to put sanctions on Israel like western countries should be doing if they had any moral compass. Instead they say the usual platitudes whilst doing nothing as Israel commits atrocity after atrocity.
Nobody should pretend that any of these countries has a moral authority to preach to anyone in future.
The US has to be very careful about how they go about doing that. If they end their military protection of Israel, or even appear to be considering it, that could risk Iran and others wanting to try to exploit the situation, and cause more instability and more conflict. The next logical step is to put politicians with genocide rethoric on the sanctions list. It's not going to be enough, or satisfy anyone, but it would be an historic step to take and line up a path towards putting Nettanyahu himself on a future sanctions list.
They have to do it step by step though, they can't be seen as abandoning or going against Israel.
What now?It is Nazi trivialization when anti-Semitism is blamed on the Palestinian lakes.
That's quite an understatement, and inaccurate really. The US is fully complicit in the genocide supplying weapons, UNSC vetos, funding and overall protection. It is as much a US genocide as it is a zionist genocide. The UK and the EU are complicit too.
I put it into Google translate and it helpfully pointed out that instead of 'Palastinenseen' it should be 'Palastinensern' and then it makes sense and stops blaming lakes.Needs a German poster for a better translation of this part. @That_Bloke
I put it into Google translate and it helpfully pointed out that instead of 'Palastinenseen' it should be 'Palastinensern' and then it makes sense and stops blaming lakes.