the_cliff
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2013
- Messages
- 6,578
The Palestinians who were already living there ?Just curious. Who was the sovereign on the land the British “gave away”?
Last edited:
The Palestinians who were already living there ?Just curious. Who was the sovereign on the land the British “gave away”?
I'm sure you don't think so.
But seriously, surely Hamas and just about everyone in the world who has his head screwed in knew that what happened would not be good for the population in Gaza.
Why not?I don´t necessarily believe that they cut of a womens breasts at the peace festival and played football with it after they raped her
So after Ottoman empire ceased to exist when exactly did this happen? On which conference/by which treaty the power of disposition transfered in this way?The Palestinians who were already living there ?
This doesn't surprise me. If you're familiar with the stop-antisemitism twitter account, it reguarly goes after people how say anything which they deem as vaguely anti-Semitic; often resulting in those exposed being sacked.
Good post. The people that defend Israel refuse to talk about pre October 7th and how the British practically gave away a land that wasn't there's to give away to begin with.
So after Ottoman empire ceased to exist when exactly did this happen? On which conference/by which treaty the power of disposition transfered in this way?
Of course you can't. My point was you can't also uninvent what happened before October 7th and act like events pre October 7th are irrelevant in the current conflict.Who is defending Israel's behaviour? But unless you have a time machine you can't uninvent the creation of the country.
Of course you can't. My point was you can't also uninvent what happened before October 7th and act like events pre October 7th are irrelevant in the current conflict.
Just curious. Who was the sovereign on the land the British “gave away”?
So after Ottoman empire ceased to exist when exactly did this happen? On which conference/by which treaty the power of disposition transfered in this way?
He's telling you that there never was a Palestine to speak of.The Palestinians who were already living there ?
Stealing land isn't one of the objectives.
They can call it a happy fun zone for all I care, doesn't make it any less despicable.No, creating a security zone is. Has been clear two months ago.
And by doing so, downsizing an area that already was overpopulated. Let's admit that it was the goal, how is that gonna work?No, creating a security zone is. Has been clear two months ago.
You know what also constitutes as a security zone? Borders.No, creating a security zone is. Has been clear two months ago.
No, creating a security zone is. Has been clear two months ago.
Come on guys, it's too complex.
It's honestly not.If you don't realise that it is complex then you will never understand the conflict meaningfully.
You second paragraph in no way makes the situation simple, and in any case Israel and the Palestininans are far from the only players involved.
Create it on your own land.No, creating a security zone is. Has been clear two months ago.
And by doing so, downsizing an area that already was overpopulated. Let's admit that it was the goal, how is that gonna work?
Come on, Amir, you can't possibly believe that it will solve anything or lead to anything but more violence in the future. It's horseshit and you know it.
You know what also constitutes as a security zone? Borders.
If it's not stolen land then presumably the Palestinians can rebuild on it and do as they wish right?
Create it on your own land.