neverdie
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2018
- Messages
- 3,011
Apparently 4,000 IDF soldiers dead in this campaign, which, if true, is an enormous figure for the IDF. Anyway, the entire thing is a disgrace. Peacedeal soon, I hope.Beirut
Apparently 4,000 IDF soldiers dead in this campaign, which, if true, is an enormous figure for the IDF. Anyway, the entire thing is a disgrace. Peacedeal soon, I hope.Beirut
Apparently 4,000 IDF soldiers dead in this campaign, which, if true, is an enormous figure for the IDF. Anyway, the entire thing is a disgrace. Peacedeal soon, I hope.
Trying to get a good few "last" kicks in.Israel negotiating a 'cease fire' in good faith whilst bombing the feck out of Beirut. Absolute cnuts.
Fog of war then. You hear these numbers thrown around.IDF soldiers? A little over 800 have died, including hundreds on October 7.
Many others have suffered serious injuries, including losing limbs.
Fog of war then. You hear these numbers thrown around.
I think it could be the second line which I'm citing. Not the killed in action but wounded and killed taken together.
I think the US/Israel understanding of a ceasefire is - we continue bombing your country, destroying infrastructure and killing scores of civilians, you don't fire back.
I'll ask the same question I asked in the other thread - what does that threat actually entail? Bombing Gaza is a meaningless threat since Biden has been doing it for over a year, the place is pretty much entirely unhabitable now. The orange loon's bark is hardly going to scare Hamas into submission since the status quo will be the same as far as they're concerned. Unless he intends to bomb Iran/Lebanon/Syria/Iraq, which would immediately unravel the façade of him being an 'anti-war' president.US President-elect Donald Trump has issued an apparent warning to Hamas, threatening "all hell to pay" if hostages held in Gaza are not released by the time he returns to the White House on 20 January.
Dozens of people taken during the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack remain unaccounted for. On Monday, the Israeli military said an Israeli-American soldier who it believed to be a captive had in fact been killed last October.
Without mentioning Hamas by name, Trump posted online the same day: "Those responsible will be hit harder than anybody has been hit in the long and storied history of the United States of America."
Israel's President Benjamin Netanyahu thanked Trump for his "strong statement".
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62757dd55no
The hopeful read is that a deal is approaching and Trump wants to take the credit for it and reinforce his image as this fierce leader everyone is scared of.I'll ask the same question I asked in the other thread - what does that threat actually entail? Bombing Gaza is a meaningless threat since Biden has been doing it for over a year, the place is pretty much entirely unhabitable now. The orange loon's bark is hardly going to scare Hamas into submission since the status quo will be the same as far as they're concerned. Unless he intends to bomb Iran/Lebanon/Syria/Iraq, which would immediately unravel the façade of him being an 'anti-war' president.
Plot twist will be when the orange idiot finds out that releasing the hostages is on the lower end of the priority list for Israel, there have been a number of deals on the table but all have been rejected.I'll ask the same question I asked in the other thread - what does that threat actually entail? Bombing Gaza is a meaningless threat since Biden has been doing it for over a year, the place is pretty much entirely unhabitable now. The orange loon's bark is hardly going to scare Hamas into submission since the status quo will be the same as far as they're concerned. Unless he intends to bomb Iran/Lebanon/Syria/Iraq, which would immediately unravel the façade of him being an 'anti-war' president.
Greatest PM in Israeli history after Ben-Gurion?
"when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities"
IDF air force guy, he had a good thread about the syrian mountain's capture and its strategic value that i had posted above.
That’s really interesting. I’ve generally viewed Iran’s interest in Syria as being an offensive asset (a conduit for arms closer towards the Israeli border) but it makes sense that it’s also had defensive aspects.
Just looking at that map, what’s stopping Israel going over Jordan, do you think, and reaching Iran that way? Or is it more a case that if they did so they’d then be over the most populated area of Iraq where (likely) the air defence would be much better than over the north? Or, thinking about it, Jordan being an ‘ally’ or at least not an enemy, might make it politically difficult.
i don't know much about military strategy, but i know, for example, that the ussr's biggest problem after ww2 was finding a way to cover their vast northern border from air attack. just too much ground. iran's pretty big and i'm guessing having the potential to attack it from multiple directions is great. same guy also mentioned that the mountain was a very good radar point which could see planes taking off from most of israel - that early warning is gone too.