If we had an owner who would let us spend freely, would we just become just like the current Chelsea?

sdb4884

Full Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
5,443
Location
Perth, Western Australia
Do you think the new owners would put proper people in place to work the manager to help sort out the transfers? it's all well and good having owners who can
afford to spend spend spend but I think being in Chelsea's position is arguably worse than ours right now. We certainly have a dismal track record of transfers since
the end of the Ferguson era which isn't a good omen for when new owners do eventually take over.
 
Uh, we do have that. Look at our net spend the last ten years, particularly the last two.
 
Seriously, we need owners who put competent people in place and build a solid structure. A.k.a owners who know football.
 
Glazers spend, but they seem to not care how much groceries they get and at what quality.
 
sdb4884 said:
Do you think the new owners would put proper people in place to work the manager to help sort out the transfers? it's all well and good having owners who can
afford to spend spend spend but I think being in Chelsea's position is arguably worse than ours right now. We certainly have a dismal track record of transfers since
the end of the Ferguson era which isn't a good omen for when new owners do eventually take over.
Click to expand...
The owners have let us spend freely and poorly
 
Thread titles are getting longer and definitely going downhill at a rapid rate.
 
Boehly put incompetent people in high-ranking positions for football matters. Arab owners usually don't feck around with that.
 
United have spent a lot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.