wr8_utd
Ripped :'(
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Messages
- 39,535
Has anyone seen it? I thought it would be really bad but it was a decent movie to pass the time with some funny moments. Not too bad at all.
The name puts me off. It sounds like a working title they couldn't be arsed changing. Most artless title ever given to a film?
I thought virtually the opposite. That for the cast and premise they had, they bottled making a really good dark comedy. It was alright, but it could've been much better, especially with Bateman, Day & Spacey on board, and a remit to be as dark as possible.
They also committed the cardinal sin of casting Jason Sudiekis.
I didn't really know anything much about the movie or cast beforehand so I was expecting a shocker but it was actually more entertaining than a lot of movies that have come out of Hollywood this past year.
I thought virtually the opposite. That for the cast and premise they had, they bottled making a really good dark comedy. It was alright, but it could've been much better, especially with Bateman, Day & Spacey on board, and a remit to be as dark as possible.
They also committed the cardinal sin of casting Jason Sudiekis.
It was definitely much better than the Hangover 2.
The idea that having Jennifer Aniston as a filthy nympho boss would be a nightmare seemed a bit odd.
Enjoyed the film though. Not spectacular but made me laugh a few times.
Julie Bowen was HAWT in the brief moments she was in this.
The idea that having Jennifer Aniston as a filthy nympho boss would be a nightmare seemed a bit odd.
Enjoyed the film though. Not spectacular but made me laugh a few times.
Has anyone seen it? I thought it would be really bad but it was a decent movie to pass the time with some funny moments. Not too bad at all.
Although I agree with Mockney, if they'd gone darker with the script and made it a proper black comedy it could have been a classic. As it stands it was a reasonably entertaining film that most will quickly forget.
Awww feckYes, Bowen not Benz but Benz's hawt as well.