Originally posted by True Treble Reds:
<strong>
Thing is, United fans didn't disappear into the woodwork when things went bad in '74. To say that the fans thought visiting strange new grounds was a novelty is really a silly little
'can't think of anything better to say' comment. Do you really think United fans wanted to travel to York City for a pre Christams game rather than the likes of the Arse or poo? Nope, we didn't, but we feckin' did! (I went with me Dad).
</strong>
maybe you didn't. and by phrasing your response like that you're inviting agreement. but i'm pretty sure that many fans do actually enjoy visiting different grounds. i know i do. that's why cups are such good fun. god forbid we join you in the nationwide, but if we did, i know i'd make more effort to get to away games than i currently do - which would help to bring the attendances up
but yes, you're right, it was a largely frivolous suggestion
but not because i had nothing else to say. i'm not 100% sure of this, but i think you'll find your attendances actually went up when you were relegated. especially the size of the crowd you took away. i think the whole adversity thing inspired people. though i'm prepared to bet it wouldn't have lasted if you'd stayed down more than one season
<strong>
You see elljay, to just about every pre '92 United fan, the Red Devils are a religion. Nowadays it is glory by association in some aspects, I'll give you that, but not back in the 70's and 80's.
</strong>
you don't have to patronise me. i might only be a kid. but my dad isn't. and i know plenty about the "old days". i'll come back to this in a moment
<strong>
United fans back then who travelled to the 'novelty' grounds and went to OT every week are almost definitely still going to OT today.
</strong>
no. they're not. not definitely. not even "almost definitely". some of them are dead. some too old to go. some of them will have been priced out. some of them will have moved away. some will simply have found other responsibilities that make it impossible for them.
<strong>
No Gloryunting tag will ever diminish the love of a club that United fans have for theirs.... Never <img src="graemlins/devil.gif" border="0" alt="[Devil]" />
</strong>
i'm not actually trying to diminish anything. i'm just trying to explain something i believe quite strongly. and let's put aside the term "glory-hunter" for a moment so it might be a little contentious
clubs like lfc and mufc (and to a lesser extent leeds, chelsea, arsenal and spurs ... and i guess, but on a much smaller scale ... all the other clubs) have always attracted non-local fans. not just because of the trophy count, but because -
a) they are born into it. dad was a manc. dad moved to australia. or portsmouth. little ozzie eric is brought up a manc whether he likes it or not
b) there's something missing in their life. their hometown is dull and they don't fit in with the kids on their estate. or they just want to be different. so they pick something else to latch onto. for some it's music. or poetry. or the internet. for some, it's football. and a (usually high profile) team to latch onto. not just for the trophies. not even just for the football. but for sense of "belonging" and "specialness" that they're seeking
i've read and heard a lot about football in the early 80s, and i absolutely know that there were hundreds of liverpool fans from all over the country who were drawn to liverpool by "the end" and by the perceived "cool" that went with being a liverpool "boy".
and i'm sure there were many others - from all the same places - who found themselves lured to old trafford for many of the same reasons
<hr></blockquote>
oh, and btw ... about taking more away. i was partially teasing. but i was also a little bit serious. check some of your programs from away games and see who draws the biggest crowd, lfc or mufc. either we take more away, or the home fans and neutrals prefer to watch our ugly boring game to your fantastically entertaining travelling french circus