FAO Golden Blunder

ralphie88

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
14,356
Location
Stretford
You kindly closed the thread in which you accused me of indulging in 'banter' about Heysel/Hillsborough in contravention to forum rules without giving me the chance to respond. I think most would consider that that's hardly fair. Some might even say it's tantamount to defamation.

I'm not expecting an apology or anything, but you or anyone else can utilise the fine search facility on this site to prove the accusation wrong anytime they like.

Thank you.
 
ralphie88 said:
You kindly closed the thread in which you accused me of indulging in 'banter' about Heysel/Hillsborough in contravention to forum rules without giving me the chance to respond. I think most would consider that that's hardly fair. Some might even say it's tantamount to defamation.

I'm not expecting an apology or anything, but you or anyone else can utilise the fine search facility on this site to prove the accusation wrong anytime they like.

Thank you.

those words are too big, please use smaller words so that they can understand your post. Words such as Spastic, Poop, and Boobs etc...
 
ralphie88 said:
You kindly closed the thread in which you accused me of indulging in 'banter' about rimming in line with forum rules without giving me the chance to respond. I think most would consider that that's hardly fair. Some might even say it's oranges to Marcos.

I'm not expecting a sheep-fest or anything, but you or anyone else can rim the fine gorilla facility on this site to prove the accusation wrong anytime they like.

Spastic
A few simple edits, and everyone will understand what you mean. Don't worry, you'll learn.
 
ralphie88 said:
You kindly closed the thread in which you accused me of indulging in 'banter' about Heysel/Hillsborough in contravention to forum rules without giving me the chance to respond. I think most would consider that that's hardly fair. Some might even say it's tantamount to defamation.

I'm not expecting an apology or anything, but you or anyone else can utilise the fine search facility on this site to prove the accusation wrong anytime they like.

Thank you.

I think you will find this better:

"Yous Fecking closed the thread in which you said I Is having banter about Heysel/Hillsborough, breaking forum rules without giving me the chance to respond. You're all cnuts and I dont think its fair. Some might even say it's Spasticated or like a boobless woman rimming monkeys.

You Fecking apoligise now, or I will come round and bitch slap yo moma, but you or anyone else can use the shite search facility (if it works) on this site to prove the gimptards wrong anytime they like"


Thank you
 
Balloonless said:
I think you will find this better:

"Yous Fecking closed the thread in which you said I Is having banter about Heysel/Hillsborough, breaking forum rules without giving me the chance to respond. You're all cnuts and I dont think its fair. Some might even say it's Spasticated or like a boobless woman rimming monkeys.

You Fecking apoligise now, or I will come round and bitch slap yo moma, but you or anyone else can use the shite search facility (if it works) on this site to prove the gimptards wrong anytime they like"


Thank you
my company's publishing a book. we need an editor as good as u, mate :D
 
topper said:
Deathly silence from the Mods

colombar.a.front.nu.jode.1g.jpg

Noodle: how fat and unhelpful are we, exactly?
Golden: Very fat. And very unhelpful.
Noodle: What do we do now then?
Golden: Absolutely nothing
Noodle: You're a dab hand at this
Golden: Rim me
Noodle: Yes
 
I still maintain Plech is getting special privileges and access to secret forums, not to mention various paid visits by his favourite pigeons for creating that great excuse to do nothing
 
Wibble said:
colombar.a.front.nu.jode.1g.jpg

Noodle: how fat and unhelpful are we, exactly?
Golden: Very fat. And very unhelpful.
Noodle: What do we do now then?
Golden: Absolutely nothing
Noodle: You're a dab hand at this
Golden: Rim me
Noodle: Yes

we should have this in a stickied thread in this forum
 
ralphie88 said:
or murdered a small child.

ralphie88 said:
"Murderers" (ie in reference to Heysel, no?)

First off all, apologies for delay but i do have to work as well.
I havent read all your threads/posts yet but ill get around to it.

See quote 2. I was not saying that you were doing it a lot, but looked like you were about to open that can of worms up. I was merely pointing you in the direction of the rules just in case you hadnt seen them.

Now, FAO the rest of you lot, this is NOT Red Issue. If you dont like the way we run the place then make your choice, stay or go. If you stay, fair enough but stop the bleeding whining.
 
golden_blunder said:
First off all, apologies for delay but i do have to work as well.
I havent read all your threads/posts yet but ill get around to it.

See quote 2. I was not saying that you were doing it a lot, but looked like you were about to open that can of worms up. I was merely pointing you in the direction of the rules just in case you hadnt seen them.

You don't need to read them all do you, surely a simple search with the term "murderer" should do the trick?

As for my reference to "murderers" (in inverted commas), that was in response to another ill-judged accusation and the inverted commas should have given away the fact it's not a term I use.

So I consider myself vindicated, and am glad to have entertained the rest of you in doing so.
 
if u searched the word Murder u would end up with about 2 million of Noodles posts
 
Someone gave him a week for posting a picture of a naked woman with an octopus stuffed up her.

He was lucky it was only a week IMO.
 
Knowing TRF, he was probably just being silly, and genuinely didn't realise the picture would cause offense.

On the other hand, he is a skinhead
 
noodlehair said:
Knowing TRF, he was probably just being silly, and genuinely didn't realise the picture would cause offense.

On the other hand, he is a skinhead

He didn't link to the photo, he posted it.

Have you had a look at it? It is only soft deleted.

It wasn't even a small octopus.
 
Why would I want to look at a picture of an octopus stuffed up a women?

Sicko