England 39-6 in tour match

Slabber

Guest
Andrew Strauss, Michael Vaughan and Kevin Pietersen all failed for the second day running as England's batting struggles in Pakistan continued.

After England's bowlers had shown encouraging form to dismiss the Patron's XI for 211 in Rawalpindi, the tourists' top order again suffered.

Mohammad Irshad, an unheralded 22-year-old seamer, took 3-22.

And England were rocking on a miserable 39-6 at stumps, with an overall lead of 84 and one day remaining.

It had been an encouraging day for England's bowlers for the most part, as James Anderson, Liam Plunkett and Shaun Udal all took three wickets.

But the home side, replying to England's 256-9 declared, staged a useful recovery from 150-9 to be all out for 211 - and that final wicket partnership might yet prove vital as the hosts target victory on Wednesday.

It was the first day's work for England's bowlers on their tour of Pakistan and they were backed up well by keeper Geraint Jones, who took five catches.

But there was a glimmer of disappointment that Matthew Hoggard was unable to take a wicket in 12 overs.

England's decision to declare on their overnight score left opener Marcus Trescothick with an unbeaten 124 to his name.

Anderson, who struggled to find his rhythm initially, was given a lift when Ashar Zaidi (11) chipped a catch to skipper Michael Vaughan at mid-on. He then found some late swing to account for Bazid Khan.

Next, Misbah-ul-Haq edged Plunkett behind and a similar shot brought about the downfall of Test opener Yasir Hameed (28) as Anderson claimed his third success.

Plunkett atoned for dropping Faisal at deep square leg off Durham team-mate Paul Collingwood by having him caught behind for nine.

Collingwood was not to be denied, however, and trapped Asim Kamal lbw for 14 to leave the home side tottering on 79-6.

The only blot on England's morning was spinner Ashley Giles' return to the team hotel with a stomach upset and he was unable to bowl.

But back-up slow bowler Udal took the opportunity to show what he can do in figures of 3-26 which included the wicket of the Patron XI's top scorer, Shehzad Malik (37).

Numbers 10 and 11 Zulqarnain Haider and Tahir Khan then both passed 30, however, before Tahir was caught behind off Plunkett.

England's second innings was a calamitous affair as six wickets fell in 13 overs.

Vaughan, batting at four, was trapped lbw for the second time in as many days, this time for a five-ball duck.

By then Strauss had been removed by left-armer Najaf Shah - caught at slip - and all-rounder Alex Loudon lasted just seven balls before inside-edging an Irshad lifter to the wicket-keeper.

The final disaster of the day was triggered by Yasir Arafat, who took 4-45 on Monday.

He added two more wickets with the scalps of Pietersen (10) and Jones (0), the latter losing middle stump as he attempted an expansive drive.

Before those late strikes, Matt Prior, who hit 50 on Monday, was the fourth man out when picking out deep square-leg with a pull shot.

His 16 is thus far the best score in England's miserable second innings.

England: M Vaughan (capt), A Strauss, M Trescothick, I Bell, K Pietersen, G Jones (wkt), A Giles, A Loudon, S Udal, L Plunkett, M Hoggard, P Collingwood, M Prior (wkt), J Anderson.

Pakistan Cricket Board Patron's XI: Asher Zaidi, Yasir Hameed, Bazid Khan, Misbah-ul-Haq, Asim Kamal, Faisal Iqbal, Imran Tahir, Yasir Arafat, Zulqarnain, Mohammad Irshad, Arshad Khan, Mohammad Asif, Najaf Shah, Shehzad Malik.
 
im here :angel:


ordered sky for the test series :cool:


freddie flintoffs hot BTW :drool:
 
The Kippax Kid said:

You have my respect, belatedly.

Though I've started a lot of threads about this series, none of which you've responded to.
 
Why haven't you responded to the many cricket threads in here. Are you a glory hunter?
 
Test matches haven't started have they.

I reckon you're just trying to appear like you give a stuff and aren't a Ashes GH.

My two penneth.
 
When Gooch scored 333 against the Indians, I was there.

When Devon Malcolm took 9-57, I was there.

When Nasser scored a century and retired, I was there.

When England won at Karachi in the dark, I was watching on TV.

feck you all, gloryhunting toss buckets. Respond to the pre-tour build-up or feck off.
 
Slabber said:
When Gooch scored 333 against the Indians, I was there.

When Devon Malcolm took 9-57, I was there.

When Nasser scored a century and retired, I was there.

When England won at Karachi in the dark, I was watching on TV.

feck you all, gloryhunting toss buckets. Respond to the pre-tour build-up or feck off.


You're defending your position, which means you're a AGH.

I was watching England at Old Trafford far before the 333. . .

And you've just cut and pasted. Add something fecking comments.
 
You can't add comments in the other sports forum. There's no one to respond. You might as well talk to yourself.

I don't mind gloryhunters as long as they keep their interest up.

I was also watching on TV when Malcolm Marshall and Terry Alderman took us to shreds but it doesn't have the same ring to it.
 
Evening Slabber, good to be here. Is Pletch's body starting to smell yet?
 
It wreaks like a rotting corpse.

Any thoughts on England's tour match? No one else has any.
 
Slabber said:
It wreaks like a rotting corpse.

Any thoughts on England's tour match? No one else has any.

Not really, cant comment much on something I cant watch. Hopefully its just the players getting used to the climate and the pitch. Still would have prefered the ODIs to be before the tests though.
 
Dubai_Devil said:
Still would have prefered the ODIs to be before the tests though.

Yes, otherwise it's like after the Lord Mayor's Show, or whatever the expression is.

ODI's before the series warms everyone up nicely. Afterwards is like a damp squib. What is a squib?
 
Slabber said:
Yes, otherwise it's like after the Lord Mayor's Show, or whatever the expression is.

ODI's before the series warms everyone up nicely. Afterwards is like a damp squib. What is a squib?

I think its some type of firework. Isnt it also something in Harry Potter?
 
Dubai_Devil said:
I think its some type of firework. Isnt it also something in Harry Potter?

A small firecracker.
A broken firecracker that burns but does not explode.
A brief satirical or witty writing or speech, such as a lampoon.
A short, sometimes humorous piece in a newspaper or magazine, usually used as a filler.
 
I think it is also someone who has magical parents but are not born with any magical capabilities, according to Harry Potter. That must suck.
 
You're just jealous that you dont have an magical abilities like Harry and I.
 
What do you think of Anderson, Loudon and Udal taking three wickets each?
 
Slabber said:
What do you think of Anderson, Loudon and Udal taking three wickets each?

Not sure, ive only seen Anderson once recently, and that was on the tour of SA and he was terrible, but he seems to be highly rated. Only seen highlights of Loudon and Udal. Its a good sign that they are able to take some wickets, even though it doesnt sound like the batting was of the highest quality. I'd still have Collingwood in Jones' place though.
 
Dubai_Devil said:
I'd still have Collingwood in Jones' place though.

Would you drop Hoggard and play the extra spinner? Or drop Harmison?
 
Slabber said:
What do you think of Anderson, Loudon and Udal taking three wickets each?

I have followed Anderson from close quarters at Lancashire, since bursting on the scene in Australia he has been very ordinary, lets hope he grasps this opportunity.

Shaun Udal is in my opinion very average, the selectors had very few alternatives to take on tour, there is a distinct shortage of spin bowlers in England at the moment, that's the only reason why England are not quite at the pinnacle yet.

I cannot comment on Loudon, not seen enough of him.
 
Slabber said:
Would you drop Hoggard and play the extra spinner? Or drop Harmison?

I dont think so, especially not in the first test. If Hoggard can get the ball to swing it will be very useful and Harmison is potentially England's best bowler. It depends on how the pitches play, so I might be tempted in the 2nd or 3rd test if it spins a lot and one of the bowlers really underperforms.

Saying that, England's biggest strength is their pace attack and I wouldnt want to change that.
 
Dubai_Devil said:
I dont think so, especially not in the first test. If Hoggard can get the ball to swing it will be very useful and Harmison is potentially England's best bowler. It depends on how the pitches play, so I might be tempted in the 2nd or 3rd test if it spins a lot and one of the bowlers really underperforms.

Saying that, England's biggest strength is their pace attack and I wouldnt want to change that.

But you're advocating playing the extra batsman instead of Simon Jones? I'd be more inclined to drop Bell for Collingwood and play an extra spinner. Or give Bell a final chance. Ding-dong.
 
Slabber said:
Would you drop Hoggard and play the extra spinner? Or drop Harmison?

Mathew Hoggard should do very well in Pakistan, generally you get reverse swing in them conditions, he is the best exponent of the art of reverse swing of all the England bowlers.
 
Slabber said:
But you're advocating playing the extra batsman instead of Simon Jones? I'd be more inclined to drop Bell for Collingwood and play an extra spinner. Or give Bell a final chance. Ding-dong.

Bell deserves his chance, he did brilliant against the shite of Bangladesh and was then thrown in the deep end against the Aussies in a really high pressure situation and struggled. I'd be tempted to play him in all of the Pakistan tests and if he doesnt do it drop him for the India tests. I rate Collingwood, I think he is good enough to play international test cricket, and could bowl a bit if need be. I really dont rate Andserson, and bringing in another bowler to replace Jones just for the sake of have another specialised bowler would be a mistake because if he doesnt do it the others would have to carry him and it would take a lot of pressure of the opposition batsmen.
 
Sultan said:
Mathew Hoggard should do very well in Pakistan, generally you get reverse swing in them conditions, he is the best exponent of the art of reverse swing of all the England bowlers.

I think Hoggard is the best natural swinger of the ball, but in terms of reverse swing I would say the best is Simon Jones followed by Freddy.