What's the evidence I need to ignore?
Too short for the crimes committed. Everyone defends tougher sentences for rapists, but when the rapist is a famous footballer/artist/etc suddenly the victims get blamed by a large chunk of society.
Well playedTo be fair, height is one thing you can't fix
But do we know the full story
Vile vile act. Vile vile man.
But surely we can just let him play football and ignore everything else. We just care about footballIt went to trial so I’d say all the evidence from both sides has been presented and cross examined.
But surely we can just let him play football and ignore everything else. We just care about football
But surely we can just let him play football and ignore everything else. We just care about football
I always have some trouble with restitution in cases where it’s her word versus his. You want to be careful giving the alleged victim any financial incentive to make the accusation.After he served his full sentence and pays restitution to the victim and is shown to no longer be a risk to the public, then sure why not?
Similar to any other crime. Serve your time, make the victim whole as much as possible, show you're reformed in the eyes of the court, then back to your life you go
I always have some trouble with restitution in cases where it’s her word versus his. You want to be careful giving the alleged victim any financial incentive to make the accusation.
Too many of these cases popping up.
I know it's very easy to condemn the individual, as we should, but is this also an indictment on the footballing environment as a whole where teenagers are idolized and earn obscene amounts of money, causing them to be able to get what they want, when they want it. I'm no psychologist, but I can imagine this having an effect on people's mindsets and even creating narcissitic tendencies.
This is in no way an excuse for him, and he rightly deserves what is coming his way, but I do wonder how these young people are coached into a healthy lifestyle, or if they are let to each to their own.
After he served his full sentence and pays restitution to the victim and is shown to no longer be a risk to the public, then sure why not?
Similar to any other crime. Serve your time, make the victim whole as much as possible, show you're reformed in the eyes of the court, then back to your life you go
But do we know the full story
This right there already tells you that he’s guilty. No more evidence should be needed once he’s tried lying multiple times.Doesn't seem long enough. I haven't read a lot but apparently he changed his story multiple times
About 40% of footballers go bankrupt in retirement. There are major issues with footballers. What does being bankrupt mean when you are no longer idolized and you no longer are able to get what you want from who you want? There are several stories of footballers, also from lower leagues, who behave as if the world belongs to them. I don't sympethise with that sort of behaviour, but I can understand why that is fostered.The vast majority of footballers are decent citizens of society. The very few that are scum are given disproportionate attention, but I'm sure the percentage of footballers convicted of such crimes is lower compared to what you see from the general population
Seems to be the theme amongst some fans.yeah footballers should get a pass from crime as long as they are good at football.
I was being sarcastic mate, that’s all I have heard all year in a certain other threadI'd have thought the relevant people do yes, as you know, he's been sentenced.