Consistency please

brewlio

A prince among poopers
Joined
Jul 29, 2005
Messages
56,262
Location
Sack Geebs, Sell Sults
I have to say that I do find it highly irregular how Johnno has been banned for posting an image of 2 fruits snogging, but it seems it is acceptable to post images of flaccid penises.

I'm aware that Johnno has done it before, and given the chance would definitely do it again. But the reason we were given that Johnno was banned was because he posted material that would be deemed inappropriate for children that view the boards. But cocks are obviously OK then :confused:

Personally, i have no problem with any of the images posted as they were all behind spoilers. If something is behind a spoiler it is usually a dead give away that the post contains relatively graphic material. Rather than come on the Caf and look at semi-rude pics behind spoilers, kids would just visit Brazzers and the like.

I can see that the Maradonna's tiny cock request and Pele's splendid schlong shot were posted for different reasons to say Johnno's full on snog by the ass drillers. I can also see how a SuperMod has been active in the aformentioned cock request thread and therefore deems the inclusion of penises acceptable. This just reinforces the selectiveness and lack of consistency in moderation.

Also, can we have a cock shot sub forum ?
 
I think he is paying for past offences from which he was lucky to be allowed back. He knows this and I have suggested a no fruits from Johnno policy when he returns in a few hours from his 2 day holiday.
 
you're right, its not acceptable to post a meat fest any bit as much as its acceptable to post other dodgy material.

The super-mod was half asleep when he posted in said thread last night so he apologises for not acting sooner

The difference with Johnno is that he was banned before and given explicit warning to not do it again
 
no, everyone knows that they need to write NSFW in the thread title, or in the case where its not their thread NSFW in the post instead
 
I honestly didn't consider a little pash between two male lesbo's as 'porn', if that's the case then I shall certainly not mince around from now, it's a fair cop Guv...
But it's nice to see Brewlio has got my back.
 
Scoreboard Red said:
for educational purposes, can someone please PM me the pics of Diego and Edmundo's cocks please?
Click to expand...

Are you doing a scientific study between Brazilian and Argentinan cocks and what they have in common in producing great footballers?

Or just a general world map of cocks ie Cocks of the world?
 
In fairness in the cock thread, it was just that. It was a penis, which is something we all have - there's nothing particularly explicit about a picture of naked man, even if it's not the most pleasant sight.

I love Johnno as much as the next heterosexual man, but a picture of a bloke showering after a match is not the same as two gay blokes getting heavy.
 
Count Duckula said:
In fairness in the cock thread, it was just that. It was a penis, which is something we all have - there's nothing particularly explicit about a picture of naked man, even if it's not the most pleasant sight.

I love Johnno as much as the next heterosexual man, but a picture of a bloke showering after a match is not the same as two gay blokes getting heavy.
Click to expand...
They werent getting heavy you cow, they were giving each other a friendly little peck.
Thats how Kouroux says 'bonjour', a little tongue kiss and a cuddle, but he's not a gay...
 
Count Duckula said:
In fairness in the cock thread, it was just that. It was a penis, which is something we all have - there's nothing particularly explicit about a picture of naked man, even if it's not the most pleasant sight.
Click to expand...

It may have just been a cock to you Count, but all the same graphic material is graphic material. Anyway, this thread isn't about what everyone else deems to be appropriate or not. There is a policy in place regarding graphic images, and I was just seeing that it was being adhered to for consistency purposes.

golden_blunder said:
you're right, its not acceptable to post a meat fest any bit as much as its acceptable to post other dodgy material.

The super-mod was half asleep when he posted in said thread last night so he apologises for not acting sooner
Click to expand...

Again Count, the above post is testament that I was correct. Also Count, the fact that flaccid penises don't bother you, you are welcome to come round and share a shower with me, as I haven't been able to sustain an erection for years. I blame it on Brokeback Mountain.
 
golden_blunder said:
no, everyone knows that they need to write NSFW in the thread title, or in the case where its not their thread NSFW in the post instead
Click to expand...

Geebs, the problem with the second option is that, say, if you're in work, the image will come up in your internet cache anyway, even if the picture itself never actually comes onto your screen. they should only go in NSFW marked threads really.
 
samabachan said:
Geebs, the problem with the second option is that, say, if you're in work, the image will come up in your internet cache anyway, even if the picture itself never actually comes onto your screen. they should only go in NSFW marked threads really.
Click to expand...

You could probably use private browsing - which is available in most browsers - so it doesn't appear in the cache. Just a suggestion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.