Cisse is all the talk at Anfield

Ed The Red

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 2, 2002
Messages
438
Wednesday, March 27, 2002
Cisse is all the talk at Anfield
By John Edwards

<a href="http://www.soccernet.com/england/news/2002/0327/20020327lfccisse.html" target="_blank">http://www.soccernet.com/england/news/2002/0327/20020327lfccisse.html</a>


Gerard Houllier has stolen a march on his illustrious rivals for Djibril Cisse's £15million signature and is confident of landing the new sensation of French football in time for next season.
Auxerre coach Guy Roux confirmed to Soccernet that Liverpool's fit-again manager had been in regular contact about Cisse and was in pole position to see off competition from Real Madrid, Barcelona, Juventus and AC Milan.

In a revealing insight into Houllier's dogged pursuit of the free-scoring France Under 21 striker, Roux said: 'Gerard and I speak all the time, and it does not usually take him long to get round to the subject of Djibril. He is a big admirer of the boy and is always asking about him.'

The veteran Auxerre coach, renowned for developing one of the most productive youth systems in Europe, has so far resisted all attempts to lure Cisse away from the Stade de l'Abbe Deschamps.

However, he is expected to reconsider at the end of the season and seems certain to point his latest protege towards Mersey-side following an appraisal of the 20-year-old that can only heighten optimism within Anfield.

Roux said: 'I do not want to lose Djibril and will keep him here as long as I can, for his sake as well as ours. When he does go, I will make sure he chooses the club and type of football that will be of most benefit to his career.

'If I had to make a decision now, I would tell him to go to England. The Premiership would be good for him. I have noticed that teams often defend in a line rather than with a sweeper.

'He would be unstoppable under those circumstances. With his pace, he would be one of the most destructive strikers in the English game.'

Spanish reports of a recent bid by Real were dismissed by Roux, while Fulham manager Jean Tigana's hopes of pairing Cisse with Steve Marlet next season also appear doomed, given the quality of the field chasing one of Europe's most wanted strikers.

Roux outlined his opposition to cashing in on his most prized discovery but hinted that Houllier could yet talk him round.

'Why should we take the money now?' he said. 'From a purely financial point of view his value will rise the more he makes his mark on our domestic league and forces his way into the senior France side.

'At the moment, I believe he would be better off spending two more seasons with us rather than going to a big club and sitting on the bench every week. We have not received a bid from Liverpool, or anyone else, but Gerard and I are good friends and talk on the phone frequently.

'The discussion tends to come round to the same subject, sooner or later, and there is no denying that Djibril's game would flourish in the English league.'

After hearing that Houllier had watched him in the recent 3-2 win over Metz, Cisse said: 'English football would suit my style and I have a slight preference for Liverpool
 
19m on Anelka and
15-20m on Cisse...

perhaps there is some truth in Real bidding 50m for Owen...
 
Originally posted by Cal:
<strong>19m on Anelka and
15-20m on Cisse...

perhaps there is some truth in Real bidding 50m for Owen...</strong><hr></blockquote>

Liverpool have arranged a fee of between £10m and £12m with PSG for Anelka
 
Originally posted by Ed The Red:
<strong>

Liverpool have arranged a fee of between £10m and £12m with PSG for Anelka</strong><hr></blockquote>

Hmmmm, Owen, Heskey, Anelka, Cisse.... What a strikingforce heh ? <img src="graemlins/nervous.gif" border="0" alt="[Nervous]" />
 
Is Cisse in the France squad for the WC, ;)

if not he cant be much good in all fairness :p
Apart from Trezeguet & Henry France are short of decent strikers.

Maybe Cisse could be the new Baros, the same fella who was going to tear the premiership apart starting last January <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
 
Heskey/Owen/Littmanen/Anelka/Cisse, how many strikers does a defencive team need? Where are they getting the money. Another Liverpool dominated decade doesn't appeal to me, I like things the way they are with us winning everything ;)
 
I wouldn't at all be surprised if Liverpool don't sign Anelka. Sure, they're saying all the right things, but what are the chances he ends up as nothing more than a short-term replacement for Fowler?
 
Soccernet are renowned for their accuracy regarding transfers. <img src="graemlins/smirk.gif" border="0" alt="[Smirk]" />
 
Originally posted by michael owen's mum:
<strong>


think about it.

a defensive team or a team with a good defence?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Think about it.
A team that has a good defence, a good forward line and no fecking midfield.
Liverpool are deluding themselves if they think that buying the top strikers is the way forward, the engine room is the most important department in ANY team. A sound defence, a top midfield and reliable forwards, that's what is required.
 
Originally posted by redfan:
<strong>

Think about it.
A team that has a good defence, a good forward line and no fecking midfield.
Liverpool are deluding themselves if they think that buying the top strikers is the way forward, the engine room is the most important department in ANY team. A sound defence, a top midfield and reliable forwards, that's what is required.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Lacking a little flair out wide, maybe, but 'no fecking midfield'?

LOL...with gerrard and hamann, that sentence makes no sense...United have a great midfield, but that didnt stop LFC with their 'no midfield' beating MUFC 5 times on the trot...i believe LFC's winner at OT this season was created and scored by half of their 'no midfield'...Gerrard to Murphy...Winning Goal!

A sound defence, a top midfield and reliable forwards, that's what is required<hr></blockquote>

So Man. Utd fall some way short of the mark of what's required with that circus of a defence, marshalled by coco the clown between the sticks.
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>Is Cisse in the France squad for the WC, ;)

if not he cant be much good in all fairness :p
Apart from Trezeguet & Henry France are short of decent strikers.

Maybe Cisse could be the new Baros, the same fella who was going to tear the premiership apart starting last January <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

Not in france squad for scotland game (world cup squads yet to be announced!!!) so not that good?...he's very young with half of europe's top clubs after him, so cant be that BAD.

France short of decent strikers?...Henry, Trezeguet, Anelka, Marlet, Wiltord, Dugarry, Govou, Cisse...yes, VERY short.

If cisse comes to LFC, he wont be the new baros (21 year-old full international who's been scoring in reserve games) but he might be the new diego (oh he's) Forlan-over and STILL not scored but its ok we only paid £7m for him.

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
 
Originally posted by Dj_Sydney_A:
<strong>

Not If cisse comes to LFC, he wont be the new baros (21 year-old full international who's been scoring in reserve games) but he might be the new diego (oh he's) Forlan-over and STILL not scored but its ok we only paid £7m for him.
</strong><hr></blockquote>

7mil for Cisse ?? ... 17mil at least mate ..

:eek:
 
Originally posted by Penny:
<strong>

7mil for Cisse ?? ... 17mil at least mate ..

:eek: </strong><hr></blockquote>

the £7m i was referring to was that which your lot paid for forlan...if we get cisse, i know houllier will have to shell out around £15m
 
The arrival of Cisse would definitely mean the departure of Anelka. Arsenal might be interested in bringing him back,since they have yet to find their so called "fox in the box"
 
How many strikers does Liverpool need?? Liverpool could never possibly sell Owen--or could they?? I mean, surely they wouldn't buy both Anelka and Cisse, to add to Heskey, Owen, Baros, etc...
 
Originally posted by mathiaslg:
<strong>How many strikers does Liverpool need?? Liverpool could never possibly sell Owen--or could they?? I mean, surely they wouldn't buy both Anelka and Cisse, to add to Heskey, Owen, Baros, etc...</strong><hr></blockquote>

I agree but if we do sign anelka and cisse, i think baros may be sold or loaned out, and litmanen will go, leaving heskey, owen, anelka and cisse...not dis-similar to the situation at Man utd with cole, yorke, solskjaer and sheringham.
 
Originally posted by Dj_Sydney_A:
<strong>

I agree but if we do sign anelka and cisse, i think baros may be sold or loaned out, and litmanen will go, leaving heskey, owen, anelka and cisse...not dis-similar to the situation at Man utd with cole, yorke, solskjaer and sheringham.</strong><hr></blockquote>

You think you will pay all that money have have 2 strikers sit on the bench? I think there will be a vast difference in the attitude of an Anelka or Cisse and that of Solskjaer. If Anelka and Cisse were both on form, would Owen willingly sit on the bench if fit? He has always be assured a spot in the starting 11 when healthy before, so would that change?
 
Originally posted by mathiaslg:
<strong>

You think you will pay all that money have have 2 strikers sit on the bench? I think there will be a vast difference in the attitude of an Anelka or Cisse and that of Solskjaer. If Anelka and Cisse were both on form, would Owen willingly sit on the bench if fit? He has always be assured a spot in the starting 11 when healthy before, so would that change?</strong><hr></blockquote>

see what you're saying but IMO the reason why fergie was able to keep 4 top strikers happy when not always playing was the fact that u were winning things and they were guaranteed top level footie and medals...i believe that if liverpool are winning trophies and competing at the highest level (CL latter stages) then GH would be able to rotate and keep them all happy...when u reach the latter stages of cup competitions, this also creates even more games and thus, they all get a fair few games...i think this would be the key to keeping them happy...

Also, i am of the opinion that owen will go, possibly after world cup, more likely perhaps just before Euro 2004...if we could get £50m for him now, i'd be happy to take it, what with the injuries he keeps getting..£50m is STILL enough IMO to buy ANYONE in the world right now, so we could replace him with that kind of money.
 
You stupid scousers. What the hell are you doing in a Man Utd forum. Go back to your losers corner freaks!!!
 
Originally posted by kemo:
<strong>You stupid scousers. What the hell are you doing in a Man Utd forum. Go back to your losers corner freaks!!!</strong><hr></blockquote>

At least none of them have said Wayne Bridge is the next Beckenbauer :p :p :p
 
Originally posted by kemo:
<strong>You stupid scousers. What the hell are you doing in a Man Utd forum. Go back to your losers corner freaks!!!</strong><hr></blockquote>

By that token, should i also say that this is an english forum and tell you to keep to Ugandan ones?

No, because i dont believe in racism or prejudice...
There are plenty of Man. Utd fans on the Liverpool forums i visit and as long as theyre polite and contribute in a respectful manner, theyre very welcome...take a leaf pal.
 
Fine fine I get the messsage. Anyways Cisee would never bench in Liverpool cuz Owen is injurry porne. And Jari would just replace McCallister in midfield.
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>Maybe Cisse could be the new Baros, the same fella who was going to tear the premiership apart starting last January <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

Or maybe he can Liverpool's Forlon <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
 
Originally posted by Tera Dushman:
<strong>Or maybe he can Liverpool's Forlon <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

Seriously what happened to Baros, he was going ot be topscorer despite only playing ½ a season.
Is yer man Biscan still around too, or did Arsenal sign him ,spray paint him and call him Viera cause thats who he was going to be.
<img src="confused.gif" border="0">
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>

Seriously what happened to Baros, he was going ot be topscorer despite only playing ½ a season.
Is yer man Biscan still around too, or did Arsenal sign him ,spray paint him and call him Viera cause thats who he was going to be.
:confused: </strong><hr></blockquote>

Baros was never going to play much of a part this season, as u all knew anyway..he's 21 and signed for the future or failing that, to be sold on for a profit..

Biscan is also in his early tewnties and an excellent future prospect (was wanted by barca, bayern munich and juventus)..

Its called strength in depth, murt.

Plus both suffer from the 3 non EU player rule, being czech and croation repectively.
 
I think what LFC want to do is what we've been seeing at times over the last months: put fast players on the wings to give us more width, speed and flair on the wings - which is imho the big flaw in our current team.

You could put Cisse on the right and Heskey on the left; with Litmanen and Owen up front. Since GH wants to rotate and since we have to protect ourselves against the games Michael Owen is going to miss, it seems obvious we would have one or two extra strikers in reserve (Anelka and Baros)

I think Berger's LFC days are numbered and the same goes for Jamie Redknapp and Gary McAllister is retiring so there is plenty of room as far as vacancies on the midfield are concerned.

I wouldnt be surprised if we would get either Bowyer or Kewell in aswell (I hope for the latter)