Britain to build prototype laser weapon.

Nick 0208 Ldn

News 24
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Messages
23,721
Britain to build prototype laser weapon

Britain is joining the Star Wars arms race with a new Ministry of Defence project to build and test a prototype laser weapon


768-1426086227298886152.svg


By Ben Farmer, Defence Correspondent
11 Mar 2015


The Ministry of Defence will begin building an experimental laser weapon later this year as a prototype for Star Wars-type armaments that could one day be used by British forces.

The project costing up to £100 million aims to create a high-energy laser that can track and hit moving targets in any weather.

Britain is joining the laser arms race as America has already developed a series of drone-killing and ship-burning lasers and already has one weapon on board a warship in the Gulf.

The MOD is looking for defence firms to help build prototype machines “to enhance the UK’s understanding of the capability of a laser based weapon system”.

“The potential of laser based weapons systems has been identified as an opportunity and offers significant advantages in terms of running costs as well as providing a more appropriate response to the threats currently faced by UK armed forces,” according to the MoD.

Trials will test if the prototype can “detect, acquire and track targets at range and in varying weather conditions, with sufficient precision.”

It will also have to “generate and precisely control a high energy laser”, while making sure the machinery is safe.

The project, known as the Laser Directed Energy Weapon Capability Demonstrator, is worth between £20 million and £100 million according to the MOD.

American and European manufacturers have been developing laser weapons for many years. The United States Navy began testing a laser weapon on board a warship in the Gulf last year.

The laser on board the USS Ponce has been tested shooting down drone aircraft and burning up small attacking boats, or at lower power to “dazzle” sensors and instruments.

Lasers have also been built for land warfare. Earlier this week, defence giant Lockheed Martin said it had used a prototype weapon to burn a hole in a truck’s engine from a distance of more than a mile.

Ben Goodlad, principal weapons analyst at IHS Aerospace, Defence and Security, said he expected laser weapons to appear on the battlefield within the next decade.

He said: “Already the US has deployed their naval weapons system in the Gulf for operational testing. The only thing we haven’t got yet is industrial production of laser weapons, they are all testing so far.”

Under the Geneva Convention lasers cannot be used as anti-personnel weapons. He said most lasers in development are being tested to shoot down drones, stop small ships and vehicles, or defend against barrages by missiles and mortars. Their short range means they are unlikely to replace missiles which can hit fast moving, agile targets many miles away.

He said: “They are very much for close in defence rather than a long range weapon.”

Once built, lasers could be far cheaper than conventional missiles, shells and bullets.

He said: “The main attraction once you have the technology in place is it doesn’t require reloading or a logistics chain.”

Recently declassified papers show that Britain deployed laser weapons in the 1982 Falklands War to dazzle Argentine pilots.

A top secret 1983 letter from the then Defence Secretary, Michael Heseltine, to Margaret Thatcher said he believed the Soviet Union could be able to field laser weapons by the mid-1980s, though it was not clear how useful they would be.

He wrote: “We developed and deployed with very great urgency a naval laser weapon, designed to dazzle low flying Argentine pilots attacking ships, to the Task Force in the South Atlantic.

“The weapon was not used in action and knowledge of it has been kept to a very restricted circle.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/11464985/Britain-to-build-prototype-laser-weapon.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon
 
The US Navy is currently testing lasers and railguns. Both are pretty awesome.
 
About fecking time. Weapons are no where near as future as I had imagined they would be by now, 15 years ago, when I was 10.

Now we need to wait for flying cars, robot (humanoid) servants and people coming back from the future to kill future rebel leaders in the inevitable humans vs robots war to end all wars until the next war, war.
 
How much money does the design, manufacture, and selling of arms make the UK every year?
 
Scary. Surely a solid laser beam slightly raises the chance of being hit by 'crossfire' though....does it? Also it wouldn't pack the punch of a bullet hitting you....would it? So you may not even instantly notice it and be able to carry on fighting for a few seconds rather than hitting the deck, no? That being said if it is a solid laser it could damage a wider area on the body if the target was moving...could it?

Its about time anyway. Firing little bits of metal is starting to seem a bit archaic.
 
Scary. Surely a solid laser beam slightly raises the chance of being hit by 'crossfire' though....does it? Also it wouldn't pack the punch of a bullet hitting you....would it? So you may not even instantly notice it and be able to carry on fighting for a few seconds rather than hitting the deck, no? That being said if it is a solid laser it could damage a wider area on the body if the target was moving...could it?

Its about time anyway. Firing little bits of metal is starting to seem a bit archaic.

It's intended to melt/destroy missiles, engine blocks, etc. Because it would burn, it would violate the Geneva Conventions. I imagine it would ignite clothing pretty quickly (2 seconds to ignite a UAV/engine) but wouldn't really be a particularly useful weapon against personnel. If you melt their insides, there's not much that can be done with them. If you shoot someone with a full metal jacket round, you can take 3 men out of combat with one shot. The man who's hit, plus two guys to take him to get treatment because it's more likely to wound than kill (of course depending on where they're hit).

 
Scary. Surely a solid laser beam slightly raises the chance of being hit by 'crossfire' though....does it? Also it wouldn't pack the punch of a bullet hitting you....would it? So you may not even instantly notice it and be able to carry on fighting for a few seconds rather than hitting the deck, no? That being said if it is a solid laser it could damage a wider area on the body if the target was moving...could it?

Its about time anyway. Firing little bits of metal is starting to seem a bit archaic.

That's good enough for me.
 
Its always amusing that we have enough money to fund wars and military projects in economic downturns but not to help people in need...
 
Going back 15 to 20 years I think wasn't there a bit of a to do about the Brits working on a weapon to blind opponents either temporarily or permanently using lasers? Some people were against it on humanitarian grounds.
 
Its always amusing that we have enough money to fund wars and military projects in economic downturns but not to help people in need...

For countries at the cutting edge of military technology, there's a ton of secondary value from the investment in military R&D. Security drove innovation and investment leading to jets, computers, rockets, satellites, GPS, the internet, radar, nuclear power, medicine, wireless communication, etc. Militaries don't invest solely in weapons or wars. For the past decade, the US military has been one of the largest investors in renewable resources in the world. They want to have secure, available energy that isn't dependent on third parties. Governments can afford to invest money into military projects that private companies would never do without it (the experimental Ebola vaccine that was used on US patients was the result of DoD funding). One example is fusion energy. The Pentagon has pursued it as an energy sources and pumped millions of dollars into it. Lockheed announced they were getting closer (whether it's true or not, who knows), but if the US was able to create fusion power, it would change the world overnight. The problem is that pushing the envelope is incredibly expensive but to maintain its technological advantage over everyone else, the US spends more on R&D than every other military does overall, except for China.

I appreciate that money could be spent in other areas, but it's not as simple as "we should put the money into NHS, education, etc." because it's just money down the drain for defense. There's a balance to be struck. It's difficult to imagine that we'd be having this conversation without the money that the US, UK, and others spent on defense R&D. Security is, unfortunately, the best motivator in the world. Fear of the Soviets surpassing the US in the space race led to the US going from sending its first man into space in 1961 and then putting a man on the moon only 8 years later. Without the threat of the Soviets? There's much less motivation in that area.

Also, the laser costs $.59 per shot as opposed to thousands/millions of dollars for missiles. A Tomahawk missile is over $1m.
 
They'll eventually be used for missile/air defense on ships once the accuracy is improved.
That's the theory
Though if you see the section on self guidance problems you will understand the problems inherent in doing so... As well as the reusability aspect.
Having studied physics I'm of the opinion that managing to achieve all the criteria in that size and cost is going to be close to impossible