Boundaries

Looking Busy

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2004
Messages
21,988
Location
Between a bad girls thighs
Can the mods please give us some idea of what's allowed and what's not (I know the caff is a pretty liberal place and some people might think i'm just moaning) but from what I can gather calling scousers murderers isn't allowed but comparing people to Hitler is.

Is that right?
 
No spoilers... you AIDS ridden, Hitler worshipping, Orca fellating gayers.
 
LB got banned for calling Scousers, murderers.

I started the trend.
 
Who's like Hitler, apart from Red Canuck, who is slightly to the right of Hitler, as Spoony correctly observed?
 
raymug5qz.png
 
Slabber said:
What's brought this thread on?

That thread about lemons with three old cogers, one kissing another whilst having his cock sucked by the third I think!
 
Looking Busy said:
Can the mods please give us some idea of what's allowed and what's not (I know the caff is a pretty liberal place and some people might think i'm just moaning) but from what I can gather calling scousers murderers isn't allowed but comparing people to Hitler is.

Is that right?

Well coming from the newbie section I can tell you there are numerous references to Scousers killing/raping/maiming etc. The only thing that I seem to have found that people really dont like is racisim. While I understand the premise, in my opinion I don't really see how it is any worse to be racist than scouserist. They are both as bad as each other yet- both discrimination yet one is acceptable and one is not. Then again it is only scousers that throw their own faeces - oh and monkeys.
 
River_Runs_Red said:
While I understand the premise, in my opinion I don't really see how it is any worse to be racist than scouserist.

Because one is a recognised social problem and the other is just anti-social.

Get it?
 
River_Runs_Red said:
Well coming from the newbie section I can tell you there are numerous references to Scousers killing/raping/maiming etc. The only thing that I seem to have found that people really dont like is racisim. While I understand the premise, in my opinion I don't really see how it is any worse to be racist than scouserist. They are both as bad as each other yet- both discrimination yet one is acceptable and one is not. Then again it is only scousers that throw their own faeces - oh and monkeys.

scousers aren't a race, they're a scourge, hence discriminating against them is proper and right and should be encouraged
 
Mots of hate or dislike scousers. Most of us think that Liverpool fans don't like to admit their liability in the events at Hysel even if trouble did start from both sides.

However, no matter what we think of scousers, the use of such events as a taunt are viewed similarly to Munich or any other disaster based taunts. Partly because of the generalisation and partly because it just ends up in a stupid name calling circle of abuse, encouraging Munich taunts and generally being deeply unproductive.

Equating someone to Hitler doesn't really have any power to upset or shock anymore (possibly unless you are Jewish and the person using the phrase is trying to upset based on that fact). In fact it is almost universally taken to mean that the user has run out of ideas and lost whatever argument is occuring.

Racism and death threats are easy to get banned for. Other stuff (ban, temp ban, ghostings) depends on the usage, the mood of the mod viewing, how big a cnut you are and other ill-defined stuff.

There have rarely been controversial bannings. The last one I remember was Charlie's Devil who loads of the general posters wanted to stay because he was funny. However, he was also one of the biggest cnut's on here and wouldn't stop when asked which is why Niall banned him.

Use your brain occasionally and a permanent ban has to be worked pretty hard for.
 
Wibble said:
There have rarely been controversial bannings. The last one I remember was Charlie's Devil who loads of the general posters wanted to stay because he was funny. However, he was also one of the biggest cnut's on here and wouldn't stop when asked which is why Niall banned him.

That was a mistake

He was just a lot cleverer than most
 
Davo said:
The fact that you think he's lightweight says it all....

Yes...

He's heavyweight, as he proved at Liverpool and now Villa...
 
Davo said:
That was a mistake

He was just a lot cleverer than most

Just not clever enough to wind his neck in when he had pissed Niall off by ignoring requests to do so.
 
Wibble said:
Just not clever enough to wind his neck in when he had pissed Niall off by ignoring requests to do so.

It would have been rubbish if he had.

That time was probably the best the general's ever been

A mistake
 
Davo said:
It would have been rubbish if he had.

That time was probably the best the general's ever been

A mistake

If a cnut wasn't occasionally banned this place would be even more out of hand than it normally is.

I didn't find him very funny TBH. Mainly snide, arrogant and up himself.
 
Davo said:
Good definition of what makes a good player

"Queue to sign him"

Good definition of what makes a shit player

"O'Leary at the head of the queue"
 
Wibble said:
If a cnut wasn't occasionally banned this place would be even more out of hand than it normally is.

I didn't find him very funny TBH. Mainly snide, arrogant and up himself.

A cnut basically?
 
Slabber said:
Who's like Hitler, apart from Red Canuck, who is slightly to the right of Hitler, as Spoony correctly observed?
Incorrectly observed thank you :p