Originally posted by MrMarcello:
<strong>Becks can go...by the time 2006 WC rolls around, Quaresma will be the best RW in the world...and he will be plying his trade at OT...for now, Kewell will be the obvious choice, to at least groom Quaresma for one season...
Realistically, I don't think Becks will leave this summer...but 35m, I'd sell him in a heartbeat...perhaps send him to AC Milan for 20m and Shevchenko...
Face the facts people...football is a business...and a chance to cash in on a valuable asset who is more media hype than actual play, is something a plc or owner cannot turn down...United is breaking into the North and South American markets, so lost money from Becks presence will be made up from the American markets...Tim Howard will bring more exposure of United to the US...and probably lead to the signing of a couple young Americans someday (Adu and Convey?)...with or without Becks, United will continue to challenge for medals...</strong><hr></blockquote>You'd sell him in a heartbeat? Because football is a business? That may be true, but we as fans should not support that. Kenyon worries about the money. We support the team. What's more important, making money off a bunch of fat Yanks, or watching our home-grown talent run out onto the pitch every week? I for one am tired of people saying we should sell Beckham for the money. He loves the club and is a great player. That's enough for me.