Ban the word 'RAWK'

charleysurf

Obnoxious, abusive bellend who is best ignored
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
16,298
Now, I'm as fond of laughing at the delusionals on RAWK as much as anyone, but all these threads quoting posts from there is getting out of hand. This should be a United forum, not a commentary track on a Liverpool forum.

Can we make 'RAWK' one of those "censored" words on the forum for a while?
 
We need someone to laugh at. RAWK gives that furthermore....its jsut all good banter. Ignore the threads with RAWK.
 
He makes a good point mind. Alot of people have a hissy fit about the match day threads. Can we not have a hissy fit about RAWK ones? Simply make 1 thread and stick to it. FFS its not like theres any different content in the threads, all you're doing is quotes Scousers.

This is a United forum after all and all I see if fecking City this or Scousers that. Its matchday and we're all discussing City and Liverpool ffs.
 
charleysurf said:
Now, I'm as fond of laughing at the delusionals on RAWK as much as anyone, but all these threads quoting posts from there is getting out of hand. This should be a United forum, not a commentary track on a Liverpool forum.

Can we make 'RAWK' one of those "censored" words on the forum for a while?
Click to expand...

This IS a United foum. The RAWK threads are posted in the Football Forum.

Judging by the number of posts they get I'd say they were quite popular. Nobody is forcing you to click on them, so if you don't want to, don't.
 
Get off your high horse and enjoy it. If you don't like the threads don't click on them.
 
charleysurf said:
Now, I'm as fond of laughing at the delusionals on RAWK as much as anyone, but all these threads quoting posts from there is getting out of hand. This should be a United forum, not a commentary track on a Liverpool forum.

Can we make 'RAWK' one of those "censored" words on the forum for a while?
Click to expand...

Why, if people enjoy referring to rival sites, then why spoil it just because you as a single unit don't like it?
Football is very much about the banter, and I personally can't help but taking a sneak look at RAWK now and again - especially when this site is down for an hour after the games.

Granted, there is no need to create a thread every hour, like some did last night, but one thread now and again when something funny happens shouldn't really be a problem - i's not like we need to save KB and thus need to cut down on the number of threads. But one big "RAWK" would make sense.

You can't just ban a word because you don't like the talk of it, that'd be like if I requested we banned the word "Messi" because I don't want to hear about him.

Just don't click the threads.
 
I quite like those threads. Harmless bit of fun, and saves the bother of trawling through all those god-awful signatures on rawk itself.
 
Storm said:
This IS a United foum. The RAWK threads are posted in the Football Forum.

Judging by the number of posts they get I'd say they were quite popular. Nobody is forcing you to click on them, so if you don't want to, don't.
Click to expand...

nah, entertainment forum surely?
 
Should just have one ongoing thread since its going to happen pretty much every week.
 
Some of them should be merged, but banning discussion of rival forums' reactions is pointless. Half the fun of watching Liverpool trip up is to wind up my mates, sometimes me and others post their funny responses here so what's different with quoting posts from other forums?
 
I must say, I've never gone into one of those threads, as frankly, I don't give a feck what they think over on RAWK, or anywhere else for that matter.

But if people like it, then leave them to it, IMO. It's not for any of us to tell them how to enjoy this forum(well, within reason).
 
Nothing wrong in indulging in a bit of shadenfreude.
 
Storm said:
This IS a United foum. The RAWK threads are posted in the Football Forum.

Judging by the number of posts they get I'd say they were quite popular. Nobody is forcing you to click on them, so if you don't want to, don't.
Click to expand...

Agreed RAWK is like richard maddley from richard and judy he's a fanny but cheers you up if your feeling down because people like him are such fannys and give you hope and show you your lot is not that bad afterall.
 
RAWK is fecking hilarious.

Just ignore the threads, I mean, it's not like you can't tell if it's a RAWK thread or not.
 
Rawk threads are pretty funny tbf

Plus, if you censor rawk, you'll also be preventing people using it as a quirky alternative to the word rock
 
charleysurf said:
Now, I'm as fond of laughing at the delusionals on RAWK as much as anyone, but all these threads quoting posts from there is getting out of hand. This should be a United forum, not a commentary track on a Liverpool forum.

Can we make 'RAWK' one of those "censored" words on the forum for a while?
Click to expand...

So because you don't like the threads we aren't allowed them?

Just don't bother reading them!
 
this sorry excuse of a request is like saying they should ban the words "Liverpool", "Chelsea" and "City" too.
 
Is Charleysurf the reincarnation of Hitler?

With the millions of references to defecating in handbags or every second thread hailed as racist, the odd reference to hilarious comment by our Scummy counterparts at RAWK should be tolerable. I mean, whats not amusing about gems such as: 'feck off Benayoun, you league-lead losing cnut'?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.