Robbie Boy
Full Member
He's just not a very good manager.
Out of interest, what would the annual table look like just up to the point they lost Van de Ven I think up to Match day 8?
# | Club | W | D | L | GD | Pts | |
1 | Man City | 27 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 49 | 71 |
2 | Arsenal | 27 | 21 | 3 | 3 | 51 | 66 |
3 | Liverpool | 27 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 34 | 61 |
4 | Chelsea | 27 | 15 | 7 | 5 | 19 | 52 |
5 | Aston Villa | 27 | 13 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 46 |
6 | Newcastle | 27 | 12 | 7 | 8 | 11 | 43 |
7 | Tottenham | 27 | 13 | 4 | 10 | 11 | 43 |
8 | Man Utd | 27 | 11 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 40 |
9 | Fulham | 27 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 2 | 37 |
10 | Crystal Palace | 27 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 34 |
11 | Brighton | 27 | 8 | 9 | 10 | -8 | 33 |
12 | Nottm Forest | 27 | 8 | 8 | 11 | -4 | 32 |
13 | Bournemouth | 27 | 8 | 7 | 12 | -9 | 31 |
14 | Brentford | 27 | 8 | 6 | 13 | -6 | 30 |
15 | Everton | 27 | 7 | 9 | 11 | -16 | 30 |
16 | West Ham | 27 | 6 | 9 | 12 | -21 | 27 |
17 | Wolves | 27 | 6 | 4 | 17 | -24 | 22 |
18 | Burnley | 19 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -17 | 13 |
19 | Luton | 19 | 2 | 5 | 12 | -19 | 11 |
20 | Leicester | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | -2 | 9 |
21 | Sheff Utd | 19 | 1 | 4 | 14 | -37 | 7 |
22 | Ipswich | 8 | 0 | 4 | 4 | -10 | 4 |
23 | Southampton | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 | -12 | 1 |
Good response mate, made some very good points there.
So where are you personally with Ange, would you like to see a change?
Over a year? They finished 5th last season.
Why isn't their injury crisis believable?
There's room for him to do better with the current squad and man management is part of that so if he's lost the dressing room he'll need to go, but the bolded is exactly what I'm talking about. What is English football's problem with football that leans more towards proactive than reactive, and why exactly does it "not work at this level"? It literally worked last season
Throwing him off a skyscraper? Seems a bit muchShould have given them the Jim McClean treatment.
Over a year? They finished 5th last season.
Pretty much like this FYI
# Club W D L GD Pts 1 Man City 27 22 5 0 49 71 2 Arsenal 27 21 3 3 51 66 3 Liverpool 27 19 4 4 34 61 4 Chelsea 27 15 7 5 19 52 5 Aston Villa 27 13 7 7 5 46 6 Newcastle 27 12 7 8 11 43 7 Tottenham 27 13 4 10 11 43 8 Man Utd 27 11 7 9 1 40 9 Fulham 27 10 7 10 2 37 10 Crystal Palace 27 9 7 11 2 34 11 Brighton 27 8 9 10 -8 33 12 Nottm Forest 27 8 8 11 -4 32 13 Bournemouth 27 8 7 12 -9 31 14 Brentford 27 8 6 13 -6 30 15 Everton 27 7 9 11 -16 30 16 West Ham 27 6 9 12 -21 27 17 Wolves 27 6 4 17 -24 22 18 Burnley 19 2 7 10 -17 13 19 Luton 19 2 5 12 -19 11 20 Leicester 8 2 3 3 -2 9 21 Sheff Utd 19 1 4 14 -37 7 22 Ipswich 8 0 4 4 -10 4 23 Southampton 8 0 1 7 -12 1
Firstly, I'd like to make it clear I wanted Ange as soon as Conte went. I was really excited for his approach, and especially due to how he handled a rebuild at Celtic, buying in lots of cheaper asian players who did really well, and youth.
However - I haven't seen any of that, personally. He's refused to adapt and a lot of the above form is skewed by how soon other teams got used to the idea that we'd just have a suicidal and naive approach to every game. So, reluctantly, he's not at all the answer IMO.
I don't know what the answer is, but I am glad Poch is in the US and unlikely to be called on - as I don't think he's much different, either. A good year or two followed by at least 18 months of regression masked by a CL final.
Part of me wouldn't mind us just putting some faith in letting Mason have a go - he's done well, IMO, when he's covered before, and none of these "established" winners have done much, ultimately. As much as Sherwood had the personality of a nightclub toilet, he got results and unearthed a lot of youth. I don't want to give him all the credit for Kane, but he's due a big lump of it. So why not someone who has seen what has and hasn't worked for the past 4-5 years (Mason, that is, not Tim)? We didn't give Kieron McKenna much of a chance and he's a PL manager now (not top 4 quality, but then again is the Ipswich squad PL quality?)
Either that or we've had links to Terzic, who could be a good shout. Iraola is flavour of the month, and I wouldn't be against Howe if he was feasible (considering he's very much tied to the south and has been quite irked at the job there at times). I'm mostly glad that Potter isn't available, but worried that Southgate is
The guys that he got from the J League were good to stand out in Scottish football, but wouldn't be of the requisite quality for a Spurs team looking to challenge near the top of the table. He had the same stance with Celtic in Europe, refusing to adapt, and while their performances were brave, they ultimately were soundly beaten by better teams.
That table isn't too bad then, in and around Newcastle and Villa is where I'd expect you to be.
I'm Scottish and a Rangers fan, so I didn't have quite the starry eyed view of Big Ange as some. Admittedly this might bias my views, but I always thought the job he done at Celtic was a bit over rated.
Don't get me wrong, he done well, and he rebuilt the team from the shambles that Lennon left, but he also benefitted from Rangers not strengthening when they were on top which helped convince Gerrard to leave mid season, which helped tipped the scales in Celtics favour, and their superior finances and setup has helped keep them there ever since.
The guys that he got from the J League were good to stand out in Scottish football, but wouldn't be of the requisite quality for a Spurs team looking to challenge near the top of the table. He had the same stance with Celtic in Europe, refusing to adapt, and while their performances were brave, they ultimately were soundly beaten by better teams.
I said at the time on here that he'd play an attacking brand of football, and wouldn't waver on it no matter what, but ultimately i couldn't see it being as successful down here because there's a gulf in class to the top teams in terms of quality and consistency that I'm not sure he's overcome before.