croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 38,099
Yes no fee but a huge signing on fee of probably £10+ million
INEOS wouldn't have issue with that
Yes no fee but a huge signing on fee of probably £10+ million
Probably not but we need sales in midfield of more than just McT. Ugarte and Rabiot would be great additions and upgrades to our midfield straightaway.INEOS wouldn't have issue with that
Probably not but we need sales in midfield of more than just McT. Ugarte and Rabiot would be great additions and upgrades to our midfield straightaway.
Also Mainoo will need to have his minutes for new season managed or risk burnout.
Also Mainoo will need to have his minutes for new season managed or risk burnout
We're the only club in the world that takes this approach of overly shielding our young talent. Hasn't really worked out, has it?
This is possibly the most untrue statement I've ever seen on this forumWe're the only club in the world that takes this approach of overly shielding our young talent. Hasn't really worked out, has it?
How's that worked out for Gavi and Pedri at Barca? Playing CM regularly that early on isn't easy, you need to manage it well. Fabregas was an outlier, Wilshere, Pedri, Gavi show minutes management is key. Even if it's resting midweek games against weaker opponents but surely not playing every single game.We're the only club in the world that takes this approach of overly shielding our young talent. Hasn't really worked out, has it?
We're the only club in the world that takes this approach of overly shielding our young talent. Hasn't really worked out, has it?
There's a big reason why Rashford stagnant as a playerWe're the only club in the world that takes this approach of overly shielding our young talent. Hasn't really worked out, has it?
Agreed. I'm sure he'd be hopping around and hareassing the opposition.Rabbit would add great physicality to the midfield
Hopefully his performance could have a leap here compared to Juve.Agreed. I'm sure he'd be hopping around and hareassing the opposition.
Agreed. I'm sure he'd be hopping around and hareassing the opposition.
You mean, hopping around as a hare and fighting opposition with his ass?Agreed. I'm sure he'd be hopping around and hareassing the opposition.
We're the only club in the world that takes this approach of overly shielding our young talent. Hasn't really worked out, has it?
No problem signing him as long as the signing on fee and wages arent unreasonable.
What would INEOS define fair on both counts?
Who knows honestly. They were happy to spend a little more on Zirkzee and happy to blow everyone else away in order to secure Yoro so I dont see them baulking at costs vs value/benefit to a certain extent.
But luckily the decision will be made by footballing people this time instead of randomly offering him an excessive contract on stupid wages like the previous regime would have.
Ye I’m going of if Casemiro and Mctominay both leave.I dont think we would get both. One or the other imho. Unless we shifted out more than just mctominay to make space for one of them.
if Rabiot can play and have a similar effect as Fabian Ruiz then it's worth the gamble
true...looks like they are deciding between the four of xavi, olmo, ugarte and rabiot but probably spending more time trying to figure out how to move McT and Casemiro to make roomDefinitely worth the gamble but remains to be seen whether INEOS decide to give him an offer
It’s more about where we are at the club. We have to build a lot at United and it takes time. For this stage that we are in, I much prefer the Arsenal approach of buying 25 and under so that you are able to mould and develop players with the system and someone not working is not a total disaster. When you sign the Casemiro’s and Rabiot’s, there’s no scope for growth, change or missteps and them struggling becomes a burden on the club with little to no takers.
true...looks like they are deciding between the four of xavi, olmo, ugarte and rabiot but probably spending more time trying to figure out how to move McT and Casemiro to make room
i mean if it's a free and only costs you wages with no signing bonus, i don't see the negative impact of making him an offer.
if there is a signing bonus...then the deal for Rabiot would be off b/c as you've mentioned, that money couldn't be utilized to bring in someone elseWell obviously the money used on the signing bonus and the wages cant be used on another player anymore. The signing bonus and the wages will also be higher because there is no transfer fee.
Wrong thread onlyWhat relation does this have to Rabiot?
Disagree.Overrated and not worth offering him a long term, expensive contract
There are better players fitting our target group, indeed. And we dont need his mama manager eitherThis is good news. We need deLigt and Ugarte. Links to Rabiot were worrying, and Simons was totally left field having just signed Zirkzee.