These ‘assertions’, as you term them, are based on learnings from history, or platitudes as you call, and on the considered thoughts of highly distinguished figures with infinitely more experience in the field than you or I, or anyone else...
Firstly, this a serious issue.
And secondly, for something to be platitudinous it would have to have been used over and over again throughout the thread, as opposed to 4 or 5 references on a page.
Learning from history is a platitude now. Okay.
I'm well aware of Nazi Germany, Hitler, WW2 etc.
I mentioned the Treaty of Versailles, as an aside, in a direct response to you as you brought up Hitler.
That's probably because children's...
No problem. I was at work today so apologies for the late reply.
The context of that particular interaction in the thread revolved around learning from history, and followed on from my general contention throughout that the 'West' had...
You claimed the Treaty of Versailles was far too lenient.
The Treaty of Versailles led to significant resentment in Germany after WWI, contributing significantly to the rise of extremist parties, i.e. the Nazis! Whilst the Marshall Plan paved...
The Marshall Plan emerged from efforts not to repeat the mistakes of the Treaty of Versailles. History has proven which course was better, not just for Germany but for Western Europe as a whole.
Have you learned that communism doesn’t work?
Jokes aside…I’ll ask the following: what’s your take on the treatment of Germany post-WW1? Was the Treaty of Versailles a wise course of action to take? Would the same megalomaniac with ultra...
Ha…No.
It just amazes me that people are so casual and unreflective with serious matters like these. Look at what’s happened to Ukraine in all of this! And if we don’t learn from history then we’re doomed to repeat it.